User talk:הראש

Runes

I don't think Wikipedia is the best forum for Q&A regarding something you have around the house, as this is instead an encyclopedia, I will admit you piqued my curiosity, and I had a free hour, so here you go, transcribed into the Latin script based on six historical runic systems, as well as Tolkein's Cirth.

ELDER FUÞARK: 22/28

HÏLÏN:TRAST

O**TB:R*Þ*LRIN*U*BS

ANGLO-SAXON FUÞORC: 18/28

H****:TRÆ*T

Œ**TB:RUÞ*LRIN*U*BS

MARCOMANNIC RUNES: 18/28

H*L**:TRA*T

***TB:RH**LRI*ÇUNBS

YOUNGER: 20/28

**L*N:TRÁ*T

***TB:RUÞ*LRINKUABS

MEDIEVAL RUNES: 14/28

**L**:*R***

****B:RUÞ*LRI*QUÆBS

DALECARLIAN R/28

**L:*RF**

****B:RUD*LR***UABS

TOLKIEN'S CIRTH: 22/28

E*T*Ł:[N/R]BD*[N/R]

U**[N/R]M:BAPs*TBIŁKALMY

As you can see, I can't see that it's really anything. It has some features of many runic systems, and has certain runes (the second and third on the bottom row) that don't appear anywhere—the third looks like a Þ rune with a backwards bowl, if you ask me. --Akhenaten0 (talk) 18:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, הראש (talk) 11:07, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Abstract art. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. freshacconci talk to me 00:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

True identity: Elohim!

Hi there, just letting you know :) I second the motion! -Peter aka Vid2vid (talk) 22:33, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Rodney Arsenault" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Rodney Arsenault. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 7#Rodney Arsenault until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Welcome!

Hi הראש! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 14:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 30

Hi! I reverted your edit on October 30 as any changes or additions to days of the year pages now require citations and any that aren't are being reverted, please see WP:DOYCITE. The guidelines were changed due to the high number of errors and the number of links to articles with no or little reliable sources. Any names or events added before these guidelines were implemented are currently in the process of being referenced or removed. If you'd like to find out more, please see WP:DAYS. Suonii180 (talk) 07:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]