User talk:בר

Hello

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Could you please explain why you are removing the word "Jerusalem" as the proclaimed capital of the State of Palestine from that article? nableezy - 14:50, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

May 2015

Hello, I'm RolandR. Your recent edit to the page Israeli settler violence appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You should never, under any circumstances, alter a direct quotation, or the title of a work cited, even if this better suits your point of view. RolandR (talk) 01:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

WP:ARBPIA3#500/30

Hello. While you have been here more than 30 days, you only have 41 edits so you are not yet allowed to edit WP:ARBPIA articles. Please follow the rules. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:39, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Articles related to the Arab-Israeli conflict are covered by discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 15:04, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

EdJohnston So what does it actually means? I'm not allowed to edit Articles related to the Arab-Israeli conflict at all? is it temporary? ברעזרא (talk) 01:11, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

It seems you have only 53 Wikipedia edits. That means you will have to wait until you have made 500 edits before you touch anything which has to do with the Arab-Israeli conflict. This restriction applies to all new editors, not just you. EdJohnston (talk) 02:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you EdJohnston. ברעזרא (talk) 02:29, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

August 2017

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:38, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Snuggums why did you reverted my edit? it is true, you can check it over here. בר (talk) 20:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

New York Post isn't a good source to use, and even if it was, that piece doesn't indicate she officially adopted it as part of her legal identity. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:48, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, בר. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michal Nagen

The article Michal Nagen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 13:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Boleyn there is a reference now. Problem solved? Bar (talk) 19:50, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. It could do with some more, but that should happen over time. Thanks for your hard work, Boleyn (talk) 20:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, בר. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, בר. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mad Decent logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mad Decent logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

אבי האומה

בר שלום, תגיד מה נסגר אתך, אברהם הוא אבי האומה הישראלית? ומדוע לא ישראל? ובכלל אנחנו מכונים 'יהודים', מדוע אבי האומה אינו יהודה בן ישראל? השקעתי וערכתי הסבר רלבנטי הרבה יותר, לאומיות היא מושג מודרני, ובמקרה הישראלי-ציוני יש אב אומה מובהק כל כך, חבל להחמיץ זאת. Dovole (talk) 18:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Dovole אכן שאלה טובה האם מדובר באברהם או יעקב. למיטב ידעתי אנחנו העם היחיד שיש לו שלושה אבות, אבל אף אחד מהם איננו הרצל. הרצל הוא חוזה המדינה, לא אבי האומה. דוד בן גוריון ודאי מתהפך בקברו למשמע מחקר מקורי מסוג זה. Bar (talk) 19:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

מחקר מקורי? אתה אמיתי? על איזו אומה אתה מדבר ה"אומה היהודית" (שוב לא נוסדה לא על ידי אברהם ואפילו לא על ידי ישראל, גיבורי הם יהודים , יהודאים, כמו בית דוד)- ולא, אין מדובר במחקר מקורי- ההבחנה בין ישראל ויהודה היא הבחנה הקיימת בתעודות אשוריות ועבור עד ימי הפרובינקיה יהודה). האומה הישראלית,

תרצה "אומה בהתהוות" מקובל שנוסדה על ידי חוזה המדינה החילונית, זה שאותו בן גוריון היה בין הדואגים שתמונתו תופיע במליאת הכנסת, תמונה שנחה אף על שידתו של צבי הכהן קוק.

Dovole (talk) 15:37, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Dovole בכל פעם שחיפשתי את "אבי האומה הישראלית" או "אבי האומה היהודית" קיבלתי תוצאות הנוגעות לאברהם אבינו. אף פעם לא הרצל. זה לא נראה לך מוזר? אם הטענה שלך איננה מחקר מקורי, אנא הבא מקורות מהימנים לפיהם הרצל הוא אבי האומה שלנו. Bar (talk) 15:56, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

הב נא המקורות שאברהם הוא אבי האומה הישראלית.Dovole (talk) 15:58, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Dovole אני חושב שזה ברור מהתואר המצורף לשמו: אברהם אבינו. אני מוכן לקבל את השגותייך כלפי אברהם, אבל אינני מוכן לקבל את הטענה שהרצל הוא אבי האומה. לכך נדרש סימוכין. Bar (talk) 16:13, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

בר, המעשה שלך פסול, אתה טוען שהטיעון שלי הוא בגדר מחקר מקורי ונתלה בתפישה המסורתית ובכינוי "אבינו" בלבד?! אני מבקש ממך לחפש טענות למקורות שלך, כי לאלה שלי יש, ומי שלמד היסטוריה מודרנית מעט יותר מבתיכון (אך גם), יוכל לצטט מקורות רבים בעניין.

בר האם אתה מודע לדיון בשאלת קיומה של אומה ישראלית, כפי שנדונה בבית המשפט העליון בישראל?Dovole (talk) 17:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Dovole, כלל לא פסול, הלא כתבתי זה מכבר שאני מוכן לקבל את השגותייך כלפי אברהם בהקשר זה. לפיכך, כל שנותר הוא לבקש בפעם השלישית מקורות לטענותייך. Bar (talk) 18:11, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

. פסול גם פסול, לבקש מקור לאחר שלא רק שהחלפת לטענה שגויה, גם לא טרחת לספק לה שום מקור, מופרך ככל שיהיה, מסתמך על ההיקש "אבינו"

בר אני לא עובד בלספק לך מקורות, לכשאתפנה למצוא מקור ראוי, אני אוסיף אותו, עד אז אתה מוזמן להסתפק בחיפושי גוגל פשוטים על מיסדי ישראל, אפילו בערכים כאן בויקיפדיה האנגלית.

לא לשווא שאלתי האם אתה מכיר את פסיקת בית המשפט העליון בשאלת קיומו של "לאום ישראלי", האם אתה מכיר אותה?Dovole (talk) 18:25, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Dovole אתה מלין על כך שלא הוספתי מקור אך במקביל טוען "אני לא עובד בלספק לך מקורות". זו צביעות. אי אפשר לקחת את טענותייך ברצינות, אם לא תבסס אותן. זאת אמורה להיות עובדה בסיסית, מה כל כך קשה להמציא לכך מקור? כפי שהסברתי, חיפוש אחר המונחים "אבי האומה הישראלית" או "אבי האומה היהודית" מביאות לתוצאות הנוגעות לאברהם אבינו. האם זה מספיק? כבר אמרתי בעצמי שלא. אבל, אין כלל תוצאות המייחסות זאת להרצל, וזאת עובדה כבדת משקל. בנוגע לפסיקה, אני מודע לקיומה אך מעולם לא העמקתי בה. Bar (talk) 19:02, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

אני לא כתבתי שאני לא אספק מקור, אלא שאספק אחד כשאתפנה לעניין (והעניין של "העובד אצלך" מכוון שבקשת המקור שלך קנטרנית).

אל תיקח הטענות שלי ברצינות, יש לך איך לתרום לערך, צא ולמד ספרי הלימוד, מהי אומה, ומהו "חוזה המדינה", מדובר במוסכמות לא פחות מבוססות מ"אברהם אבינו".

המקורות שאתה כנראה מוצא הם דתיים, ולא חסרים כאלה, אתה כנראה אינך מוכן להכיר בכך ש"ישראל" היא "מדינת ישראל" ולא "בני ישראל" מהמעשיות המקראיות.19:49, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Dovole אני מצטער, בקשת מקור איננה קטרנית. ודאי שלא למידע בסיסי שכזה. הרי יש אינספור מקורות לכך שאטאטורק הוא אבי האומה הטורקית. העובדה שאתה מתקשה לספק מקור לטענה שלך כנראה מעידה על טיבה. Bar (talk) 20:27, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

בר אני מצטער, אך לדיון עמך אין תועלת (אינך יכול להשיב באשר לפסיקת העליון כדי שיהיה לנו איזה בסיס משותף לדיון), וזה כאשר מדברים עמך בשפת אמך, אני מניח לך להתבשם "במקורות" שלך שגויים ככל שיהיו.

Dovole זה פשוט: כשיש מחלוקת על מידע, ולא על דעה, ניגשים למקור ובודקים אותו. אם אפילו אין מקור, אין על מה לדון בכלל. Bar (talk) 20:35, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

בעבור קוראי עברית מדובר במידע ברמה של ספרי לימוד, תיקנתי השגיאה בערך, תוך הסבר מפורט, לא התפנתי למצוא מקור ראוי, הגם שיש כאלה המונים כאמור, והדרישה שלך כזה היא לא רק קינטור אלא מזיקה למרחב הערכים, לאחר שהשבת והתעקשת על שגיאה בוטה.Dovole (talk) 21:14, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dovole (talk • contribs) 21:12, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

זה לא נכון. קוראי עברית החליטו להסיר את ישראל מהרשימה בוויקיפדיה העברית. ראוי אם כן, שכך יעשה גם ביתר הוויקיפדיות. אני לא הגבלתי אותך למקורות באנגלית, ולצורך הדיון, גם אם היה מקור בעברית זה היה טוב. אני לא מצאתי כזה. אם יש כאלה "המונים", אינני מבין מה הבעיה להביא לפחות אחד. התבססות על מקורות חציונים ואיכותיים לא רק שאיננה קינטור, אלא תנאי הבסיס לכל ערך בוויקיפדיה. Bar (talk) 21:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

אני חושש שאתה טועה ואתה תביא למצב אף פחות רצוי.Dovole (talk) 21:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ram Ben-Barak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue and White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

2019–20 Israeli political crisis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019–20 Israeli political crisis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 22:21, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

ANI

As you're removed the again, the issue is now at WP:ANI here. Number 57 08:08, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Cropped versus group image

Sorry, בר, as mentioned in the ANI report, I don't see how you finding the image to be unflattering (which, honestly, I don't really see) can be grounds for it being supplanted with the less relevant group image. Per the policy, you do not actually get special consideration just because you are the creator. In that sense, it's too late, you've already released the image under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. I read both the Hebrew and English talk page discussion regarding the image, and your position is just not adding up, I'm sorry to say. El_C 13:44, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

El_C Please show me where I claimed to own the photo ?? In fact, I argued the exact opposite. I explained my opinion on the talk page. Bar (talk) 13:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Bar, fair enough. That was my own assumption and I accept your correction. Sorry about that. I have since commented on the article talk page, so please feel free to respond there. El_C 13:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

El_C He wanted to start a discussion on ANI because he thought he had a majority. While He realized he do not have a majority because he relied on sockpuppet, he sent his complaint anyway. Why are you ignoring it? It is also clear that I do not claim ownership of the picture, - but that is his main claim against me. Why are you ignoring that too? Also the second you declared your support on his side, he switched between the photos. That's how discussions are taking place on English Wikipedia? Bar (talk) 17:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Because I'm starting to agree with Cullen that you may have OWN issues pertaining to this after all, despite all your protests to the contrary. And please leave the moving or copying of items from the Administrators' noticeboard to admins. You are not mandated to do so. El_C 22:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Of course this is nonsense, but even if it was true this is no excuse for ignoring the significant problems I mentioned above. However when I wrote these complaints a few hours ago I thought you were an admin so I complained about your hypocrisy. Now I understand that you are a regular user and so it is not your responsibility to be unbiased. Bar (talk) 22:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

I am an admin and I take an exception to your personal attack. Please don't personally attack other contributors, or you may face sanctions. El_C 22:37, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

So you do admin, well it is very disturbing. I find your conduct, in this case, unprofessional and biased. You are not eligible to ignore my complaints against number 57, even if you agree with him about other things. This is not a personal attack but a legitimate criticism that should take your attention. Bar (talk) 22:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Noted. But accusing me of "hypocrisy" is a personal account. Please don't do that again. By the way, Cullen is also an admin. So is Number 57. El_C 23:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

So now the motives for this delusional behavior are clear - You're just protecting another admin. In Hebrew Wikipedia, I have not yet encountered an admin who managed an edit war. Especially not one who restores another's edit in the second he got support from another user. You ignored it as you ignored his vain complaint, and all in the name of protecting another admin. Your conduct, as Number 57, is rotten from the ground up. Bar (talk) 00:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick(Talk) 12:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Renuar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Renuar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renuar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 20:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Florence Downes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Florence Downes, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 19:49, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited King of Italy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Banna and Arbin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Cite your sources

Please, add citations on Protests against Benjamin Netanyahu because it does not cite any reliable source. Econdo 25 (talk) 07:49, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Protests against Benjamin Netanyahu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Protests against Benjamin Netanyahu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Captain Calm (talk) 09:10, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

I've had enough. User:Captain Calm Delete the draft. Bar (talk) 11:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Protests against Benjamin Netanyahu (2020). Thank you. Captain Calm (talk) 11:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

It seems boring to you. Please stop making trouble. Bar (talk) 11:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Florence Downes

Hello, בר. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Florence Downes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:09, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The destruction of Joseph's Tomb

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The destruction of Joseph's Tomb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://slavaguide.com/sites/joseph-s-tomb-history-and-important-events. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 16:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

AI awareness renewal

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Selfstudier (talk) 18:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Breach of 1 revert rule

At Shireen Abu Akleh, you are in breach of the rule that says you must not revert more than once in 24 hours. Kindly self revert. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 18:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

User:Selfstudier, Are you administrator? ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 18:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

No. Please self revert as you were asked. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 18:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not your private property. You added * today * controversial content and we have a dispute. Therefore, you need to restore to a stable version, and discuss it on the talk page. You are ignoring this law.

I see you removed the paragraph and started a discussion on the talk page. I respect that. Thank you. ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 19:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Here are the diffs.

1st revert

2nd revert

I have now asked you three times to self revert, I will not ask you again but will file a report at AE requesting a sanction. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 19:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

If you do not self-revert I will be reporting you to arbitration enforcement. nableezy - 19:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Since this controversial content is new, it should be discussed on the talk page. Anyway, that's how I understand it. If admin will decide otherwise, I'll restore my last edit. ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 19:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is בר. Thank you. nableezy - 19:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

You did not even wait for my response.ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 19:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

You were asked multiple times to self-revert, and still now have refused. nableezy - 19:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

I did not refuse. ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 19:42, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Then you have declined to self-revert as requested. You can still self-revert now, if you continue to refuse then I will continue to ask for sanctions. nableezy - 19:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

I believe, nableezy, owing to recent events, that one should escalate this matter. This user has clearly engaged badly with Wikipedia on multiple pages. Scientelensia (talk) 22:55, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, בר

Thank you for creating Negev Summit.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:36, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

48 hour block

For an attack in the edit summary, I have blocked you for 48 hours. PhilKnight (talk) 13:18, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

This must be a joke. Carlos Latuff is anti-Semitic. This is clarified in his Wikipedia article. I did not attack anyone, I stated the obvious. This is not my personal opinion. That was declared by international Jewish organizations that fight anti-Semitism. Please remove this block. ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 13:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

You should not attack living people in edit summaries. I have read his Wikipedia article and it uses the language "it is alleged" he is antisemitic. PhilKnight (talk) 13:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Unfortunately you preferred aggressive step as blocking, over contacting me first. I accept your correction. He is not considered anti-Semitic among his supporters, some of whom are accused of anti-Semitism themselves, but among Jewish organizations that fight anti-Semitism. Now please unblock me. ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 13:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Fair enough. I have unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 13:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring at Israel and apartheid.

You recently breached 1R at this article and it was let go. The third revert is just edit warring. Selfstudier (talk) 22:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

It doesn't matter if I like it or not. There was a discussion on the talk page. ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 22:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

One editor does not a discussion make. And it certainly does not make a consensus. You have been reverted three times by three editors, including an admin. Selfstudier (talk) 23:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

It was before the discussion. Also, unanimity is even better then consensus. 23:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC) ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 23:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

I said three editors reverted you. Selfstudier (talk) 23:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

But two of them before the discussion. Since then, a discussion took place on the talk page, as should be done on Wikipedia, and it was decided to remove the photo, because of the anti-Semitic aspect. ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 23:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

There is no discussion on the talk page. And even if there was, you have no consensus for your edit because three editors reverted you. Selfstudier (talk) 23:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

1RR

I'm aware we have not yet reached consensus on the talk page, and you and I still disagree about the wording issue on Re'im music festival massacre, but you are in violation of the 1RR. I'm not reverting it myself because that would make me also in violation of the rule. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:10, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

AntiDionysius (talk) 22:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Scientelensia (talk) 22:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

1RR

You have violated the 1RR at Re'im music festival massacre, kindly self-revert or you may be reported. You are also misrepresenting the poor sources you are citing, but thats another topic. nableezy - 00:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Not really 1RR because the article has since been updated. But I reverted according to your request. ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 01:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

No, it was a 1RR vio, but ty for self-reverting. Please see the talk page for my concerns about the other sources. nableezy - 01:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You are indefinitely banned from editing anything related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned due to edit warring in violation of WP:1RR (here and here, resulted in reminder; here and here, with a later restoration here; here and here, self-reverted on request; here and here; here and here), as well as talk page spam and NOTFORUM violations (here, here, and here).

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 19:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

I considered instead imposing an indefinite block from the site, but my hope is that you can edit constructively in other areas if you're prevented from focusing energy on the conflict. Stay safe. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 19:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

This may require additional action. The user has weighed in on a discussion pertaining to renaming the article Allegations of war crimes against Israel. I am not sure if this was connected to an incident reported in that discussion of a different user emailing editors in an attempt to rally support to directly affect the outcome of the discussion. entropyandvodka | talk 11:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

I didn't edit an article, I voted on the talk page, so this is fine. Also, I will appeal this ban in the near future. ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 12:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

No. You are not permitted to edit talk pages related to the topic. You are not allowed to discuss the topic on any page. Read WP:TBAN and make sure you're in compliance moving forward, or you risk a sitewide block; an uninvolved admin might decide to do so just based on the breaches so far. You are definitely allowed to appeal the block, and the instructions for doing so are in the block notice above. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

user:theleekycauldron Am I alreay allowed to edit? ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 15:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

You are still welcome to edit, but your topic ban remains in force – you are welcome to appeal the block at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard or the administrators' noticeboard. See the former page for instructions on how to do it, and let me know if you have any questions about the process. Thanks :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

I should note, you violated your topic ban twice after being warned about it earlier in this thread – here and here. If your appeal has a chance of being successful, you'd need to have some satisfactory explanation as to why you can be trusted to play by the rules. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

In order to answer, I need you to explain to me how the article "Mitznefet", which is simply a fabric cover, is relevant. ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 21:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

your topic ban is from the Arab–Israeli conflict, broadly construed. I would hazard a sentence comparing a Tzahal head covering to a keffiyeh falls under that heading. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

I've never heard Israelis and Arabs discussing the resemblance of Mitznefet and Keffiyeh. It's quite far-fetched to claim such a connection to the Arab-Israeli conflict. I'm unfamiliar with such an issue in the Arab–Israeli conflict, and I am aware of the conflict quite well. Just to be sure I just Googled it and found no information relating that issue to the conflict. ℬ𝒜ℛ (talk) 21:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Pretty much all Tzahal-related topics generally fall under the conflict, broadly construed; you're welcome to bring this up as a defense in your appeal, of course. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)