User talk:Хорошинда

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Sims 3: Pets, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Sims 3: Pets was changed by Хорошинда (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.985668 on 2011-08-30T11:10:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:10, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Accept a gift from me!

Хорошинда (talk) 19:22, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No attacks please

Hi. I have deleted your user page and have removed some attacking comments from this Talk page. You are welcome here at the English language Wikipedia if your intention is to work on improving articles, creating new articles, etc. However, I see nothing but a vandal attack on The Sims 3: Pets in August, and some comments attacking people on the Russian Wikipedia here in your user space. That is not acceptable, and it is not what an account on the English Wikipedia is for -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:21, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS: If you have a problem being blocked on the Russian Wikipedia, you need to follow the unblock process that is applicable there -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The reminder and the memo

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Giant Snowman 11:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where my 17 age is? It is in The Big Caret Street (rus. - Bolshoi Caretny)!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Хорошинда (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I not use my account for vandalism on this Wikipedia!Cannot block users because of their userboxes! I not use account for policy! There are this userboxes on English Wikipedia! Why it blocked me because of it! (talk) 16:18, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for your age. You're blocked for vandalism, as seen in places such as here, and for wholly improper personal attacks, then claiming to have "missed a letter" - really. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please can the reviewing admin also review the discussion at ANI? [1]. Хорошинда you'll need a better reason then your age. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh and it might help if you can explain why you called the blocking admin on the Russian wikipedia a faggot on his userpage here. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I never insulted! And you know that this administrator of Russian Wikipedia violates the law of double accounts! He blocked me without the right to appeal to the Arbitration Committee! This isn't a violation of?!--Хорошинда (talk) 16:38, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Any blocking that happened on the Russian Wikipedia is of no relevance here, as you have been told before - if you have any complaints about it, you'll have to take them over there, not here -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Why it blocked indefinitely me? I not gonna a vandalism in this Wikipedia! I not insulted! May be, any letters not written correctly?--Хорошинда (talk) 16:50, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - All English speakers hates Russia, therefore they blocked me! Believe NATO that terrorists and Evil Mister Putin lives in Russia and makes sabotage against the world! And everybody speaks that WIKIPEDIA is a neutral web-site!--Хорошинда (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC) With comming Happy New Year, everybody![reply]
        Well, that didn't end well. I have turned off your talk page access. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]