User talk:ХЕРАЛДИКА СССС

Only when an administrator comes. ХЕРАЛДИКА СССС (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool down

Pozdrav. I saw your edits and what you have been doing. As a compatriot of yours I will like to help you and leave a few suggestions. First, try to be calm and understand that people may have different views. This encyclopedia has been built for almost two decades, so forget the "I came here, I know the truth, I´ll correct it"-attitude. That may occur in some obscure unknown areas, but with the main article of a European language such as Serbian language, certainly not. The issues you are dealing with have been discussed zillions of times. Yes, "Serbo-Croatian" is polemical, but many liguicists still consider it one language. The fact that we have now governaments that force an opposite idea, doesnt mean much. It is the academics from the area of liguistics that have the biggest weight. Then, second issue, Cyrillic. Yes, Serbian Cyrillic is the official alphabet, but so is Serbian (Gaj´s) Latin. During 19 century Serbs in Austro-Hungary used both alphabets while writting Serbian, and did you know that changes Gaj introduced were accepted first in Serbian than official Croatian? Also, forget the "I live here, I know it"-attitude. Serbian Latin is not some "regional" thing, or "used for export". That is ridiculous. I am totally Serb, lived there, and used Serbian Latin just as Serbian Cyrillic. All my family did. Half are Serbs from Belgrade, half Serbs from Bosnia. So easy up a bit. Read some discussions at article talk-page, see and understand the arguments from the other side as well. Be constructive, not warrior. FkpCascais (talk) 11:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A drugo, jeste vi uopste procitali da ono sto pisete kao "tacno" da je to tek predlog koji treba da prodje kroz Skupstinu? Razumete razliku, zar ne? FkpCascais (talk) 11:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Drop the attitude and consider yourself lucky that you still haven't been blocked for violating the three-revert rule. It doesnt matter what you know or not, you are removing large parts of sourced content without any consensus to back you up and if I see you continue doing that like you did with Serbian language or anywhere else I will report, you can consider this warning. Shellwood (talk) 14:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]