User talk:Тимур Азадов

Recent changes

Stop deleting content and use the relevant talk page. You are creating an edit war and this is a warning. If this persists, you will be reported. Thank you. Eastfarthingan (talk) 21:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You think deleting this is going to solve the problem? Eastfarthingan (talk) 12:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think that your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries. Stop spamming your nonsense on my talk page or I'll taunt you a second time.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Тимур_Азадов reported by User:Llammakey (Result: ). Thank you. Llammakey (talk) 12:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Montreal Campaign

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be a jerk

or you'll be blocked without a second thought. You are not of sufficient benefit to the encyclopedia to put up with the smug assholery. Only warning. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And you are not a sufficient authority figure for me to heed to your lame@ss advice. I am fed up with a torrent of DYK entries that contain zero hook (which, I remind you, is supposed to be "a surprising or intriguing fact" and "interesting to a broad audience") and are neither engaging nor interesting to laymen that DYK is aimed at. How do these, to name just a few, meet the hook requirements?

The user's obstinate focus on the same single topic resembles more of an adolescent's attempt to draw attention to a hobby that they are too passionate about. Тимур Азадов (talk) 16:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a jerk, with no other benefit to your presence. there should be some reason to believe you will stop being a jerk before an unblock.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 16:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]