User talk:Сергей Соковнин
Re Pyotr Slovtsov
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- You are welcome, but there's still plenty left to do in that article. I only touched the surface. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 26, 2010; 15:44 (UTC)
- Of course I believe you :) I'll go through this article more thoroughly some time this week. By the way, если вам удобнее, со мной можно по-русски.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 26, 2010; 17:29 (UTC)
По-русски, это я с превеликим удовольствием, потому как неуч. Спасибо за помощь, ещё раз благодарю.Сергей Соковнин (talk) 18:15, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
The Record of SInging
[edit]Hi there. Thanks for creating such a nice article on Pyotr Slovtsov. We certainly can use more articles on Russian singers. However, Slovtsov does not belong at The Record of Singing article. "The Record of Singing" is a specific list that was compiled and published by EMI. The wikipedia article is a faithful recreation of that list. Since Slovtsov was not included in the published "Record of Singing" he should not be added to the list. All the best.4meter4 (talk) 12:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Labinsky -- a question
[edit]Thanks for your work on the Andrey Labinsky article. I couldn't find any references or explanation for this: "soloist Sinoidalnogo of the Znamensky cathedral chorus". Would you be willing to explain "Sinoidalnogo"? Jo3sampl (talk) 00:18, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- I translated this word uncorrectly, excusme me. It means "Synodal". I wrote this little article, because my grandfather and grandmother had been ajware of him. He was popular opera singer. But I know about him? by my sorry a little.Tnank you very much and excusme me for my "excellentknowllege of Englishdepo (talk) 19:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Свобода знаний? Каких???
[edit]Поддерживаю решение Госдумы:свобода нужна, но только без матерщины, порнографии и всего того, что является моральным запретом. Я по-поводу тёток в колпаках и цветных чулках выражал своё негодование матерщиной, используемой в статье. Мне ответили, что есть правило, разрешающее цитировать матюги! Полностью поддерживаю Госдуму! Вина государства в том, что подобное следовало бы запретить сразу, как в Китае сделали. У Вас свои ценности, у нас-свои. Мs свои ценности неоднократно отстаивали на Бородинском поле, причём с успехом. Выбирая между свободой распространения порнографии, матерщины, бескультурья и запретом этих категорий, я выбираю запрет. Такое ВИКИЗНАНИЕ мне, да, наверное и большинству моего многонационгального народа - НЕ НУЖНО!!! Обойдёмся без Ваших свобод.depo (talk) 15:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Сергей Соковнин. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Minor edits
[edit]Please do not mark edits like this[1] you made to the article on the Battle of Borodino as minor edits. A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism.
Your edit added useful new content. It was not a minor edit. Toddy1 (talk) 19:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)