User talk:Сароман

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Omnilogy

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Omnilogy, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Omnilogy&defid=5606293.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:52, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. C759 (talk) 13:47, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The links, in my scientific opinion, are appropriate, because they have adequate, unique, relevant content (for example true photos of typhoon areas). As far as we can't reach an agreement about this, the issue is reported in the Wikipedia's administration page -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents and the administrators will take care about it. (All this information I'm adding here only for the readers, who didn't read our debate with the user C759 over there: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:C759#Relevant_photos_links_from_Scientific_source_seo-forum-seo-luntan.com). I think this ends the current conversation here, because some men like me are too busy with their online and offline jobs + with their families and they have no time for free labor! Сароман (talk) 15:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing

I can't help but notice that you've been editing the Voat page, updating its Alex rating all the time. Have you thought about editing other pages here? GamerPro64 14:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No time for free labor

I have no time for free labor. And I don't edit Voat page so much -- only post the actual Alexa rank to show it's down and down, and to make you think is this Voat website really needs a Wikipedia page. I don't think so. That's it.