User talk:Миша Карелин

Welcome!

Hello, Миша Карелин, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RGloucester — ☎ 16:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@RGloucester:Thanks a lot. M.Karelin (talk) 18:42, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For the barnstar! Bearian (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Basil I

I do not have the Norwich book, unfortunately, so I'm unable to help find the page number for the reference to Basil I and his language and speech. I did find a reference in Macedonia and Greece: The Struggle to Define a New Balkan Nation By John Shea, p. 56 that claims had been made that the Macedonian dynasty spoke a Macedonian Slavic dialect, alongside Greek, and that they were slavicised Armenians or of mixed ancestry. Urselius (talk) 14:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks anyway. M.Karelin (talk) 19:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

For US Court of Appeals cases, you can use:

Infobox COA case

See Gill v. Office of Personnel Management. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 10:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. M.Karelin (talk) 12:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Thanks for the comments. I really appreciate it! :) Teammm ^talk
_email 00:47, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tomorrow we will talk about Florida here

If you mean on Monday, no. The judge's order takes effect at the end of January 5. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 19:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bmclaughlin9: At the "end" of January 5 ?? What does it mean? At what time exactly? M.Karelin (talk) 20:01, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not hard. As soon as the calendar changes to January 6. Normally we'd say 12:01 am January 6. See for example the clerk's office that will open at 11:30 pm Monday in order to give out licenses at midnight here. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks a lot. M.Karelin (talk) 23:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Armenian Ambassador

Hello there, the chart on the list are probably the most accurate as they draw from the embassy websites. As seen here, Richard Mills is indeed the current Armenian ambassador. Therequiembellishere (talk) 00:24, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. M.Karelin (talk) 11:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Миша Карелин. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions

Thanks for the article. Do you have sources for paragraphs 2 and 3?–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:55, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CaroleHenson Yes, its a Syllabus of the opinion (the begining), and a very first part of the opinion (before paragraph I). M.Karelin (talk) 05:47, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Nice work with this article, Misha. I went ahead and made a few edits, and I also added citations after each sentence for the slip opinion. I hope that you will continue to contribute to articles about SCOTUS cases -- we certainly could use more help expanding Wikipedia's coverage in this area! Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 07:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Notecardforfree Dear colleague, thanks alot for your kind words! And thanks for improving the article! M.Karelin (talk) 08:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Миша Карелин. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I turned for help

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Путеец (talk • contribs) 06:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Миша Карелин. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Миша Карелин. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Миша Карелин! Your additions to 2024 United States presidential election have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Acroterion (talk) 23:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 00:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only one who violates the rules here is you. My info is based on official Government info. M.Karelin (talk) 00:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which you are not entitled to interpret as election-related on your own. That's the problem. Acroterion (talk) 00:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The section name is "Border and immigration crisis". If this info is not about that, then what is it ?? M.Karelin (talk) 00:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit was about about criminal detainees, not the border, and not the election, and your source doesn't have anything to say about the election either. If it's not supported by references germane to the article, it's out of place. Acroterion (talk) 00:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those "criminal detainees" are immigrants who were arrested and released into the county because of the Policies which resulted the Border crisis - one of the most important topics in the article. M.Karelin (talk) 00:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And you can't say that in an article unless reliable sources draw that conclusion. Not you. Read WP:SYNTH and WP:COATRACK, you've been around long enough to know these things. Acroterion (talk) 01:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source says that, you just did not read it. M.Karelin (talk) 01:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The letter says nothing about an election, and other editors have pointed out that it is being used to misrepresent data over 40 years, which covers eleven administrations of both parties. You are taking a primary source and interpreting it inappropriately. Acroterion (talk) 02:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my comment here . NBC's comments are not based on names. "Some people said" ..That's so pathetic and unprofessional !! M.Karelin (talk) 03:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See my last comment in the talkpage thread. You are just repeating partisan talking points that have distorted real data to the ends of a political campaign, and are being reported as distortions. Please don't use Wikipedia that way, and don't attack other editors for pointing that out. Acroterion (talk) 13:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]