User talk:TotSamyjNiekto

Welcome

Hello Михаил Марчук, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Михаил Марчук, good luck, and have fun. – Aboutmovies (talk) 05:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

I'm sorry for edit warring--Mr. Vladimirovic (talk) 09:04, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:07, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Canada

Can we get you to read over Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle....dont want to see you block over an image.--Moxy (talk) 03:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But it's free image, why you remove this image?--Mr. Vladimirovic (talk) 03:08, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

as per the deleted note, as per the link in editsumary and note on the file....its not real...in Canada the realone is copyrighted. Its not the job of Wikipedians to present non official symbols as real. National symbols are very important and should not be misrepresented to our readers when there are official versions.--Moxy (talk) 03:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Mr. Vladimirovic (talk) 12:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Climate

I have reverted your edits on the climate data for Fort St. John, British Columbia for a couple of reasons.

First you cannot remove yearly values since this will cause the yearly values on the weatherbox to differ from the ones from the source. That's because if you use this source, the values are different from the more accessible source due to rounding. As such, the yearly values in the accessible source are actually the rounded values from the CSV one. I found out that after realizing that some climate data in Canada had their yearly values removed, leading it to be different from what the source says.
Secondly, wind chill values shouldn't be rounded as well. Both humidex and wind chill are measured to the closest 0.1 degree, so it shouldn't be rounded to the closest degree (eg. -58.5 should be left as -58.5, not be rounded to -59). Wind chill values used to be displayed like the humidex (eg -58.5 instead of -59 for example) when the 1981-2010 normals were released early on (back in 2013–2014) but for some reason, the source just rounded the wind chill value for no apparent reason (they used to round snowfall and precipitation values too before). Ssbbplayer (talk) 14:33, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Before trying to edit climate data for Canadian locations. Take these facts into consideration. Ssbbplayer (talk) 14:33, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Mr. Vladimirovic (talk) 15:19, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Osment

I have reverted your edit on this article as it's not really needed. The Template:Infobox person code automatically scales the image size, and per the page the optional image_size parameter "should not normally need to be set." If you find the image to be too big, you can change your own image size preferences. Tabercil (talk) 13:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Mr. Vladimirovic (talk) 13:22, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, it's not normally needed to be set. By setting a hard image limiter such as 250px in place on the infobox, you are over-riding how I choose to have the images displayed on my system with your own choices. Please be kind and set your own image limits (under Preferences / Appearance - find the Files section and it's the Thumbnail size option). Tabercil (talk) 13:32, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Mr. Vladimirovic (talk) 13:34, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Don't forget to undo your last edit on the Emily Osment article once you've tweaked the thumbnail size to your satisfaction. Tabercil (talk) 13:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Undid. Mr. Vladimirovic (talk) 13:45, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tot Samyj Niekto. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Delhi, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. The edits your reverted are not vandalism. It was addition of the Punjabi script for Delhi. In situations such as this where you are unaware whether the edits are vandalism or not, either leave it for another editor familiar with the article to deal with it or contact any active editors of the article — LeoFrank ^Talk 13:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TotSamyjNiekto. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]