User talk:МетроГол

December 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated unexplained removal of content and failure to communicate when other editors have raised concerns.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had explained several times. Don't you bother to review them first.

I respect your decision, but I don't think it is a fair move. МетроГол (talk) 11:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That your edits were completely nonsensical and you have removed 89 references, sections and some content on the article History (American TV network). You're pointlessly removing months, days and leaving only years in the dates. --LDM2003 ^{talk to me!} 16:59, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

МетроГол (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I still think that I am wrongfully banned from editing. Please review all my edits, I said all. I had provided "reasons" for content removal and always preferred article's talk page for anyone eager to talk. I even have several articles published by me. Why do I vandalise?

Decline reason:

I see no use of article talk pages for any of your blanking. I see no explanations on article talk pages nor on this talk page. Where did you provide reasons for content removal? You may provide links to such discussions in future unblock requests. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

МетроГол (talk) 11:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

МетроГол (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had provided "reasons" in "edit summary" section. And also on talk pages like here and here. МетроГол (talk) 16:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your use of edit summaries and talk pages is still far too sparse. You're going to need to convince us this will change in the future in order to unblock you. 331dot (talk) 16:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

МетроГол (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, I regret what I had done. And I promise to change this activity in future. МетроГол (talk) 04:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is too generic to have any persuasive power. You should compose your next appeal carefully otherwise your ability to edit this page is likely to be withdrawn. MER-C 02:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"Bhai The Gangster" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bhai The Gangster has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 25 § Bhai The Gangster until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Draft:Bhai The Gangster" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Draft:Bhai The Gangster has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 25 § Draft:Bhai The Gangster until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gujarat garba heart attack incident for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gujarat garba heart attack incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gujarat garba heart attack incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AlexandraAVX (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, МетроГол. Thank you for your work on List of incidents of cow vigilante violence in India. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, МетроГол. Thank you for your work on Marina Kuwar (actress). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

IMO and edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking as reviewed. Really needs an independent source that covers her in depth do solidify it with respect to that,

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of programmes broadcast by Zee Café for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of programmes broadcast by Zee Café is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programmes broadcast by Zee Café until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 19:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Special Class

Hello, МетроГол. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Special Class, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Special Class

Hello, МетроГол. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Special Class".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]