User talk:Лъчезар

Old "talk" was archived here; please don't edit that.

This page intentionally kept blank.

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Igor Panarin's prediction of the United States collapse in 2010. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Igor Panarin. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you.

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Igor Panarin. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Igor_Panarin's_prediction_of_the_United_States_collapse_in_2010, you will be blocked from editing.

ANI

I've raised you recent comment at ANI for wider discussion: Hello, Лъчезар. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Verbal chat 12:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted comment

moved from: Talk:Igor Panarin#The main author of this article and the article whose contents you deleted received a last warning before his banning or blocking! after this diff

Very well done, gentlemen! The article Igor Panarin's prediction of the United States collapse in 2010 was effectively deleted (by deleting its entire contents and replacing it with a quick redirect directive), without even opening a discussion for deletion, after the previous such discussion was resolved as "keep", and the only reason the article hasn't given a "good article" status were its minor language faults (explainable as English is only the third language I've learned in my life)! All this without any significant changes to the article! Unbelievable but a fact, what miracles can the so-called "Wikipedia community" do by "consensus" of just a couple of people! Yes, to destroy is easy, to create is difficult. An article that took a couple of months to write and which almost achieved a "good article" status can be deleted in a couple of days, without even adhering to formal practices. Sad but fact! Do you see how Wikipedia really works? As you say, "Bite that"!

Not only that, but I, the main author of this article (not the "owner", as I don't recognise the so-called "intellectual property", so don't accuse me for assuming that!), who has worked intensively for some months on it, received a beautifully coloured last warning (visit my "talk" page to see it) by User:Fifelfoo (he "forgot" to sign, but the history showed him). This must mean that the next time I try to do anything here or on the page with the deleted content, I and my IP address will be instantly, fiercely, mercilessly and permanently banned, blocked or whatever that's called.

All this because I dared to challenge the pet theory (that U.S. astronauts have allegedly been on the Moon) of another user who, since then, has watched every action of mine and has decided to most cruelly punish me for even thinking the heresy that the Apollo flights were a hoax, let alone trying to allow the others think so! But he had said that "Orthodox is what Wikipedia is and if I try to subvert it, I'll be stopped". How right he was! His virtuosity in stopping me is unmatched so he can now rejoice his victory as I'm really stopped now! (Just don't talk me about "good faith"!)

But if you think that by deleting the article about the U.S. breakup you can prevent that breakup, you're playing the worst possible wishful thinking! The U.S. will collapse in 10 months, to the joy of the other 6 milliards of people!!! The monster that makes the Earth tremble by marching on its land, its water and its air will either die or blow up the entire Earth and himself with it. This monster is guilty for 100 millions of human lives, which will be proved in a special Nuremberg-like trial, and will have to return the $1,000,000,000,000,000 (one quadrillion!!!) of total debt (with all derivative instruments included, according to our newspaper "Strogo Sekretno"). And the Wikipedia and the entire Internet will free from American rule, at last and forever. Then, and only then, all the controversial articles (there are thousands of them, not only these two and the pro-NASA ones) could be rewritten as non-Orthodox. If you're so scared by little men like me, then the time for the collapse of your monstrous so-called union has really come!

You say that we'll suffer too? Let us suffer! Let us suffer, but only the Master of the World die! The Master of the souls of our children, the Master of Wikipedia, of the Internet, of all the media, of everything possible and impossible in the world must die, to save the world from final corruption, to stop controlling his milliards of zombies who will awake from this nightmare and see the truth!

No Empire can last forever, and yours is no exception. If not in 2010, then in 2011, in 2012, but I'll live to see it – that's enough for me! OK, so now look into my eyes (my user page now includes a link to my page at work) and then ban me, block me or whatever this is called! Why you must do that? Because I know the biggest secret of Wikipedia! It's not an "on-line encyclopaedia", no! What it really is is a device to wash milliards of brains, which due to its huge size hasn't reacted quickly enough to my appearance and has allowed me to stay for almost an year. Now that it's clear what dangerous enemy of Wikipedia I am, not only banning and blocking but also maybe a quick e-mail message to my bosses at work will be due, so they can understand how dangerous employee they have. And then, I'll be fired (since receiving such an e-mail message from The Imperial Masters equals to a direct advice what to do!) and my wife and children will have to starve. All this because I dared to challenge the biggest lie in the human history, that Americans allegedly were on the Moon, ha-ha-ha!!! --Лъчезар☭共产主义万岁★ 11:35, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've copied this here in case you want easy access to it. If you want to be blocked then I'm sure that several admins would be willing to accommodate you, but that doesn't seem to be the most constructive attitude to have. I know that you are a true believer, and putting up with the rest of us who referr to the beliefs that you have as theories and fringe thinking must be difficult, but you've always come across as a generally reasonable person to me. I haven't been following the Igor Panarin article, but surely there must be some way for you to work out your differences with whomever you're having conflict with. Good luck!
— V = I * R (talk to Ω) 23:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Air force flag of People's Republic of Bulgaria 1946/1990.

1) bonjour, je fais des recherches sur les drapeaux de l'armée de l'air des pays communistes, savez vous s'il vous plait me dire si la bulgarie avait un drapeau merci beaucoup

2) La Bulgarie demeure politiquement très proche de l'URSS, étant parfois considérée comme sa « seizième République ". Dans les années 1960, il est envisagé côté bulgare, de manière non officielle, de demander l'intégration de la Bulgarie à l'URSS; cette idée n'a finalement pas de suite pourquoi cela ne sait pas fait ?

Merci bonne journée —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dunkerqueenflandre (talk • contribs)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Igor Panarin has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments here . If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.

Proposed deletion of Alexander Ivanovich Popov

The article Alexander Ivanovich Popov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Possible hoax, sources do not corroborate content. See this forum post, which says "Search tells me Alexander Popov hasn't been mentioned before today."

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 09:38, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexander Ivanovich Popov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Ivanovich Popov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Ivanovich Popov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:14, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian help needed

Hello Лъчезар, I'm contacting you because we need some Bulgarian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on bg.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Bulgarian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 20:26, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calligraphist (artist)

Dear Bulgarian Wikipedian: if you can find something in Bulgarian that might help the article Calligraphist (artist), please help! Thanks, Drmies (talk) 02:57, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your non-netural signs

In here, you signed as "☭共产主义万岁★ ", that is extremely rediclously not netural and you agree with China, and you may break the friendship between China and the Republic of China (Chinese Taipei/Taiwan). 333 -blue 13:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Лъчезар. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christopher Martenson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Martenson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Martenson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PK650 (talk) 02:10, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Claudio Kron

The article Claudio Kron has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 00:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]