User talk:Индира Задорожная

September 2022

Hello, I'm Deltaspace42. I noticed that you recently removed content from United Russia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Deltaspace42 (talk) 11:27, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at United Russia, you may be blocked from editing. — Czello 10:11, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Nardog (talk) 10:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Verkhovna Rada, you may be blocked from editing. You changed the romanization of lots of Belarusian, Russian and Ukrainian words. While you may have done so in good faith in most articles, at Verkhovna Rada you repeated your error after having been told off by another editor. Rsk6400 (talk) 05:52, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mykola Azarov. Rsk6400 (talk) 08:43, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at Romanization guidelines

I recently reverted some of your edits where you changed from correct romanization to an incorrect one. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Romanization_of_Ukrainian/Ukrainian_National_transliteration_table and WP:RUS for the system we follow. Rsk6400 (talk) 05:34, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Diabedia per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Diabedia. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 16:56, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]