User talk:ДМ/Archive 1

Grand Lodge of Russia

I just noticed that the website of this GL is down, in a form that usually indicates non-payment. Are you aware of a problem? Thanks. Fiddlersmouth (talk) 00:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can remove the link to the site. There are some problems. I hope that the site will soon start working. ДМ (talk) 14:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest flagging it and giving it a few weeks to see if it comes back. My concern is that allowing their main website to lapse without an alternative (Facebook still points to the same dead link) is usually a sign of a deeper problem. No urgency, though. Fiddlersmouth (talk) 00:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ок. ДМ (talk) 05:36, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand Lodge of Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Master. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ок, , I will clarify the link.ДМ (talk) 15:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

re Gavriil Kamenev

Hi. What's your source for categorizing Gavriil Kamenev as a freemason? Herostratus (talk) 22:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ок. ДМ (talk) 05:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are dozens of these unsourced changes, including categorizing non-Russians like Michel Garder as "Russian Freemasons". Please stop and WP:VERIFY. If not in the article at lease provide a citation on the talk page. Qzd (talk) 04:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IKR. Kamenev seems the canary in the coal mine because he's awfully obscure, and there doesn't seem to be much biographical info about him available at all. Pony up your sources or face rollback on all of these. Herostratus (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, ДМ, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.

However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.

Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything.

FriyMan (talk) 18:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Freemasons of the Grand Orient of Russia’s Peoples

A tag has been placed on Category:Freemasons of the Grand Orient of Russia’s Peoples requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^{T go beyond} 21:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Smjg. I noticed that you recently removed all content from United Grand Lodge of Russia. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Smjg (talk) 12:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is an erroneous redirection, because on the page History of Freemasonry in Russia there is nothing about the United Grand Lodge of Russia. The history of Freemasonry in Russia is not the history of the United Grand Lodge of Russia, which was created only in 2008. ДМ (talk) 12:33, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then how about following the instructions I've just given you? — Smjg (talk) 14:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I explained to you that the United Grand Lodge of Russia is not mentioned in the article History of Masonry in Russia. The redirect is wrong. It must be deleted.ДМ (talk) 14:48, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I heard you the first time. So what? — Smjg (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing) ДМ (talk) 15:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Orient of Russia's Peoples

Hello, I realise that you are aligned to London freemasonry, but we do not judge and claim that those aligned or originating from Paris freemasonry are "illegitimate", this is an internal basic squabble. The Grand Orient of Russia's Peoples clearly belongs in a category on Russian freemasonry. Claíomh Solais (talk) 21:55, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grand Orient of Russia's Peoples was not a Masonic organization. Read the memoirs of his leader - Kerensky. He was co-Freemasonry, Masonry - no. ДМ (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The proposal to join the Masons I received in 1912, immediately after being elected to the Fourth Duma. After serious reflection, I came to the conclusion that my own goals coincide with the goals of society, and accepted this proposal. It should be emphasized that the society I entered into was not an ordinary Masonic organization. The first thing that was unusual was that society broke all ties with foreign organizations and admitted women into its ranks. Further, a complex ritual and the Masonic system of degrees were eliminated; Only an indispensable internal discipline was maintained that guaranteed the high moral qualities of members and their ability to keep secrets. No written reports were made, lists of members of the lodge were not drawn up. This maintenance of secrecy did not lead to a leakage of information about the purposes and structure of society. When I studied the circulars of the police department at the Hoover Institution, I did not find in them any information about the existence of our society, even in those two circulars that concern me personally.

- Kerensky AF Russia at the historical turn. Memoirs. M., 1993. P. 62-63 ДМ (talk) 05:52, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This text in the Russian article on VVNR, with qualitative references to historians of Freemasonry, doctors of science:

Великий восток народов России был создан на учредительном съезде в Москве летом 1912 года. Характерным отличием лож ВВНР от лож ВВФ являлась отмена ряда обязательных пунктов в работе: упразднение степени подмастерья, упрощение ритуалов, написание политических программ вместо зодческих работ, обсуждение политических вопросов на собраниях, работа не «во имя Прогресса», как в ложах Великого востока Франции, а политическая активность в Государственной думе. Ложи Великого востока народов России, носившие название «масонские», таковыми не признавались другими масонскими организациями, а считались политическими кружками[3][4]. Многих представителей ВВНР это непризнание масонами привело в будущем, когда они после Октябрьской революции 1917 года покинули Россию, к повторному прохождению ритуала масонского посвящения. Тем самым подтверждалось участие членов ВВНР в немасонской организации[2]. Великий восток народов России прекратил свою деятельность в 1918 году[5]. ДМ (talk) 05:58, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ДМ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kerensky's Masonic Network

Hello Freemason. I am slightly confused by your edits to Grand Orient of Russia’s Peoples, Category:Grand Orient of Russia’s Peoples and Category:Members of the Grand Orient of Russia’s Peoples‎.

The Grand Orient of Russia’s Peoples was founded directly from Russian-based lodges of the Grand Orient of France and the Grand Lodge of France. These people were Russian and Freemasons, so they belong in the category Russian Freemasons. The fact that this organisation allowed women to be members, doesn't change this (Reform Judaism is still a branch of Judaism, even if it allows females to be Rabbis, for example). Co-Freemasonry is a form of freemasonry.

Also, this organisation operated in both the Russian Republic (which it essentially created) and the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, as your man Alexander Halpern was still in hiding in Petrograd in 1918, trying to whip up counter-revolution before going off to work more openly for British intelligence. So these states belong in the infobox.

If you could explain how your edits and removal of applicable categories makes sense, that would be fantastic. Claíomh Solais (talk) 14:44, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yes, this organization was created by members of several мasonic lodges, but not all. The majority did not support the creation of this organization. Of the 94 masons, only 37 took part in the creation of the GOoRP. At the time of the official proclamation of this organization (1912) several lodges had already ceased their work or were closed by the GOdF (1910). Freemasons and lodges of the GOdF did not participate in the creation of the GOoRP. This is written by A. Kerensky in his memoirs. He also writes that GOoRP severed relations with all Masonic organizations in the world by the time it was created. There is no information on the correct establishment of the lodges. Rituals were simplified. And the Masonic regulations were abolished. Therefore, after the October Revolution of 1917, everyone who wanted to return to Freemasonry had to undergo a ritual of regularization. Kerensky and some of his comrades refused to do this and they were not recognized by the Masons even in the GOdF. References to Russian historians of Freemasonry confirm these facts. That's why I delete your wrong categories. ДМ (talk) 15:29, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Lodge of Russia

Hello User:ДМ. The edit you have made twice to this article today does not make grammatical sense in English. A Grand Lodge, if recognised by the Regular masonic world, is said to be the regular jurisdiction for that country, or of that country. It is not the regular jurisdiction to that country, as you have suggested. I suspect there is some difficulty of translation here, on the assumption that English is not your first language. Timothy Titus ^{Talk To TT} 15:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, оf course, English is not my native language. But I'll try differently to write. ДМ (talk) 16:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained edits

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Grand Orient de France does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Zazpot (talk) 14:53, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ДМ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ДМ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Russian freemasons

Hello. I have recently suppressed the category "Russian freemason" in 30 pages, because these articles either mention nothing concerning freemasonry, or mentions the term but in reference to other persons. You reverted me without any comment. It is very possible that you are right for some of these article, maybe even for all of them. But Wikipedia cannot accept your word for it: if you want to restore the mention of the category, the freemasonry of the person must be mentioned in the article and referenced with a reliable source. Please provide sources: if you revert me again without any comment I will notify you to an administrator. Sapphorain (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]