User talk:ˢᵐᵃˡˡᵗᵉˣᵗⁱⁿ

Welcome!

Hello, ˢᵐᵃˡˡᵗᵉˣᵗⁱⁿ, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 18:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have indefinitely blocked you because you appear to admit that you had another account before this one, and that account was blocked. That would mean that using this account is block evasion, which is not permissible. Regardless, given your inability to explain anything coherently, you appear to not be sufficiently competent to edit here. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This seems a little heavy-handed. Blocked forever after four edits? Seems like WP:BITE. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: I think you've badly misunderstood this. They tried to create their userpage (User:ˢᵐᵃˡˡᵗᵉˣᵗⁱⁿ) and were prevented because of an entry in the title blacklist. That led them to write "When I had just joined this website I am already blocked from even making my own page" which is true: they created this account and the filter blocked them from creating their own userpage. There's no evidence here or anywhere that they have a previous blocked account. Your note here about their competence is wholly unwarranted: not being able to understand our sometimes-cryptic software notices for an editor whose first language is probably not English is not really an indicator of competence, and besides, when asked to clarify, they wrote a reply that was clearly understood by everyone who read it. They had just been advised to request a new username to solve their issue when you blocked them for three inapplicable reasons. Please fix this. Ivanvector's squirrel (^trees/_nuts) 18:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Beeblebrox and PEIsquirrel: Unblocked. My apologies to the user.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the advice to choose a new username - it's likely consensus would be to disallow this one. The characters are very small and difficult to read on some devices and seem to have been chosen instead of standard characters for decorative purposes. Peter James (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Drewcoolitback per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drewcoolitback. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ST47 (talk) 17:52, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]