User talk:Ƿronglyþ

Welcome!

Hello, Ƿronglyþ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

TZLNCTV (talk) 21:17, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Ƿronglyþ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Ironyx64". The reason given for Ironyx64's block is: "Vandalism-only account: clearly not here to contribute i

Blocking administrator: Bencherlite (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You're now blocked directly as a sock puppet. PhilKnight (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship to Ironyx64 and Wronglyth (talk · contribs)? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 08:03, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wronglyth is the modern English equivalent of my username, Ƿronglyþ. Ƿ is Wynn, which meant W, and þ is Thorn, which means TH. --Ƿronglyþ (talk) 02:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of TZLNCTV (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, for god's sake, I am TZLNCTV and this acc is LEGIT! Didn't you see the user page desc?

What WAS on my user page:

Ƿilgiest æt mín tramet. Ic ágietan Ƿikipeðia inméðe. Þes page is well-ærated.

ðu cóud ealdor forhátena mec "Wronglyth".

This user is an alternative account of TZLNCTV.

This notice confirms that the user is familiar with Wikipedia's policy on using multiple accounts and that this account will not be used for sockpuppetry.

You may discuss this account at User talk:TZLNCTV.

See user creation—contribs—page moves—all logs—block log

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ƿronglyþ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account is not my sockpuppet, that was Ironyx64. I promise to no longer make vandal edits or destructive edits on Wikipedia. I am very sorry for the trouble I have caused.

Decline reason:

I'm not convinced that you are here to contribute positively to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request unblock only from your main account.
If this isn't a sock puppet, what is it?
Saying that Ironyx64 was your sock directly contradicts what you say here when you say he's a guy on your network. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 03:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to cover it up; as I stated earlier, I was very tired. --Ƿronglyþ (talk) 03:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]