User talk:Żubr Kresowy

This is Żubr Kresowy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Romuald Szeremietiew has been accepted

Romuald Szeremietiew, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 18:08, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Napoleon Baniewicz (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Significant number of unsourced claims

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Napoleon Baniewicz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Żubr Kresowy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Napoleon Baniewicz has been accepted

Napoleon Baniewicz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Too many articles to list, this must stop. Doug Weller talk 07:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at State capitalism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 07:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rudi Dutschke, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 08:25, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, what do you mean there is no reliable source for Rudi Dutschke being a far-left extremist? The entire article speaks of it, I am against the hipocrisy of calling moderate politicians like Korwin-Mikke far right while far leftists are never pointed out. Żubr Kresowy (talk) 16:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What sources say he was a far-left extremist? Doug Weller talk 16:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Żubr Kresowy, you seem to be suggesting the Wikipedia article can function as a source for itself ("The entire article speaks of it"), but I assume you don't mean that? You're supposed to provide a reliable secondary source for text you add to articles here. To provide it, not gesture vaguely at its existence. Please look up Wikipedia:Reliable sources to see what that entails. Moreover, the lead section, which you edited, is supposed to summarize the article. It's not for adding your opinion to. If you have at least one reliable source for "far left", please add both the fact and the source at an appropriate place in the body of the article. Then you may add it to the lead section. Bishonen | tålk 17:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

I see that a lot, if not most, of Napoleon Baniewicz is still unsourced. Doug Weller talk 17:43, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toporzeł - this attempt to hide antisemitism is completely unacceptable

Do it again and expect a block. Doug Weller talk 08:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are obviously extremely uneducated and do not know anything about the Toporzeł and Szukalski. You just have targetted me and are fighting against everything I wrote. It is factually wrong that the Toporzeł is a fundamentally "racist" and "antisemetic" symbol. It is used by pagan organisations such as Niklot and Zadruga. The antisemetic groups were always a minority. You do not call the German eagle a "National Socialist symbol" even if it was used by them. I ma not "hiding antisemitism," but doing away with false statements regarding this symbol. Even the article on the Swastika is more nuanced. I see that you have targetted me, you aren't even checking what you are doing, it is you who should be blocked. You are ruining this encyclopedia. Żubr Kresowy (talk) 16:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't checking your sources. That NKVD book was self-published. Doug Weller talk 13:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of indefinitely in order to get you to see his page. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 12:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This block is just to make sure you see this talk page

New editors sometimes have no idea they have a talk page and that people are leaving messages for them. Just acknowledge that you have found this page and you can be unblocked by me or someone else if I'm not available. Doug Weller talk 12:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked you. Doug Weller talk 16:56, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]