User talk:ßlackHeart

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Bras d'honneur, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Whispe ring 02:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kurgol

The article Kurgol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a made up word. Cannot find evidence of its existence.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 02:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kurgol in Large Numbers

It is based on the word found in the page Large Numbers.

November 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I or someone else undid one or more of your recent contributions to My World 2.0 because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 09:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Hexagonal pyramid

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hexagonal pyramid, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Augmented seventh chord a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Please, before making any other big changes like this, bring the issue to the talk page of the affected article and explain what you propose to do. You need consensus for this sort of change. — Gorthian (talk) 19:27, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So far, I actually do have the resources that claim that an "augmented seventh chord" is an augmented-major seventh chord with symbol V+7. It does not mention the augmented-dominant seventh chord, so I am providing a way to differentiate these two augmented seventh chords (They are rare anyways).

IJ digraph

In the future, please refrain from erroneously changing instances of capitalized Dutch IJ digraphs to Ij; this is contrary to regular spelling conventions. Because IJ is a digraph, it is generally treated as one unit and thus both elements are capitalized. As a Dutch native, this is entirely conventional; it is misleading to suggest (as you did by moving IJsbrand to Ijsbrand) that Ij is somehow a more correct spelling: the opposite is true. — Kleio (t · c) 10:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. Being a digraph does not entitle both letters to be capitalized when the digraph needs to be capitalized (in titlecase). Dž, Nj, and Lj are all considered one letter in Serbo-Croatian (mostly because it corresponds to one Cyrillic letter when written this way), but do not have that mutant property that when it needs to be in titlecase, both letters are capitalized. I checked on other wikipedias, and found out IJ is the only mutant one, the one which *both* letters become capitalized when put in titlecase. No other digraph does that. ßlackHeart (talk) 20:59, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that no other digraph does that is entirely irrelevant. Whether you like it or not, the convention for IJ is to capitalize the entire thing. As you said, it's the only one that does that, but it does do that, and that is the accepted way to handle that digraph. You can't just declare this convention invalid because it isn't to your liking. Please, stop vandalizing. — Kleio (t · c) 00:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SUre. I WOuld let this I.J. stay, but can you give me an official source regarding DUtch CApitalization and how IJ is handled? ßLackHeart (TAlk) 04:46, 29 DEcember 2016 (UTC)

Here is an official source of the Dutch Language Union explaining that 'ij' should be capitalized as 'IJ' in Dutch. – Editør (talk) 13:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

THank YOu - now I understand about the IJ. ANd, HAppy NEw YEar's, WIkipedians! HAve a GReat 2017! ßLackHEart (TAlk) 04:33, 2 JAnuary 2017 (UTC)

Please stop

After making a nonconstructive change to 'ij' once more, you found the time to vandalize yet another article (the one on the trigraph dzs). Please refrain from making such edits. Maybe you think it's funny, but I am tempted to have you blocked. On Kleio's talk page, I have suggested you'd stay away from articles that contain 'IJ'. Maybe you should stay away from all articles on letters, digraphs and trigraphs that don't occur in the English language – in this Wikipedia AND in those in other languages. Richard 08:32, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chord names and symbols (popular music)

Hey, your disambiguation link for the aug 7 chords leads here :

http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py?page=Chord_names_and_symbols_(popular_music)&editintro=Template:Disambiguation_needed/editintro&client=Template:Dn

What is that all about? New to editing and therefor simply don't understand. OmneBonum (talk) 14:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Chocolate and RockYou

In the article on Digital Chocolate, you claim the company's games were purchased by RockYou. However, you cite no sources on this. Other sources merely state that RockYou licensed some of Digital Chocolate's games. They say nothing about them outright purchasing anything. Where did you learn of this? 92.217.167.98 (talk) 03:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The website for Digital Chocolate is removed. Many of the games have been taken over by RockYou.

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lj (digraph), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LJ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stedelijk.logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stedelijk.logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]