User talk:Ömer Cengiz Çelebi

April 2009

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Neurology. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. ~ Butros (Talk) 10:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Magnetic resonance imaging. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ~ Butros (Talk) 10:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Magnetic resonance imaging. ~ Butros (Talk) 10:50, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru ^talk 12:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for advertising or self-promoting in violation of our conflict of interest policy and notability guidelines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ömer Cengiz Çelebi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The content and the links I added to Wikipedia were comprised of scientific material where all of them were prepared in the context of academic work. From the scientific point of view, they are proven to be useful for all researchers who are interested in the related topics / fields. The topics added were covering issues on; 1. Digital Signal and Image Processing [1] and 2. Neural Networks [2] where both of them were scientific tutorials in fact. Based on this explanation, I do not agree your decision.

Decline reason:

This account appears to exist solely for promoting a specific web site, which would put it in violation of Wikipedia's rules against spamming. As you did not respond to warnings to stop, a block was appropriate. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:28, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ömer Cengiz Çelebi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Scientific content can not be regarded as "promotion" since this web site is intended to be scientific. I insist on your decision to be declined.

Decline reason:

No, this web site is intended to be an encyclopedia, and the subject of a website does not matter; you're not allowed to spam for it here. Sandstein 20:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Being very honest, it looks to me like you have a strong conflict of interest, here -- if my assumption is correct, you're not approaching this from an arm's length, but rather to forward your interest in celebisoftware.com; that could be considered advertising. If you're going to claim there's widespread public of professional interest in this content, I do respectfully ask that you document that... where's the mainstream mention of this in notable, reliable, third-party sources? Professional journals, newspapers of record, that sort of thing, would be ideal. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]