User talk:Öcsi

Hello Öcsi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! —Khoikhoi 02:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Délvidéki vérengzéskeről

Üdvözöllek barátom! Én is 30,000-40,000 áldozatról tudok, az én dédapám is köztük volt(igaz, hogy ő német ártallan civil volt), . Nagyon megköszönném ha segítenél. A probléma abból fakad, hogy PANNONIAN nehesztel rám a Trianonellenes álláspontom miatt, mostmár tudom, nem kellett volna feltüntetnem a userlapon. És mindenbe beleköt, csak az ő verziója a jó és még ráadásúl írt egy cikket, ami a szerbek bántalmazásáról szól a magyar katonák részéről. A cikket személyes támadásnak vette, hisz mint később kiderült a nagyapja partizán volt, annak az apja pedig relytélyes módon egyszerű falusiként a magyarok ádozatává vált. Az ő véleménye elfogúltabb az enyémnél. A forrásaimat Nazi propagandának tartja, annak ellenére, hogy nem tudja őket elolvasni. Az ővéit pedig tőkéletesen semlegesnek tartja, hisz a partizánokat is azokat véli. A másik probléma pedig, hogy a szerb médiában(ha úgy tetszik, porpagandában) el szeretnék tusolni az esetet, vagy legalább úgy beállítani, hogy a legtöbb áldozat náci kollaboráns volt, a partizánok meg persze pártfüggetlen igazszívű szabadságharcosok voltak. Úgy örülök, hogy találtam valakit, aki kiáll mellettem. Ezt az ügyet nem hagyom annyiban, a világ végre megtudhatná az igazat a délvidéki vérengzésekről. Még 1x üdv barátom.
HunTheGoaT 11:44, 01 October 2006 (CEST)

Üdv ismét! Kérlek az adatokat írd be te ,és igazold forrásaidat is, mert ha ezt én teszem meg PANNONIAN azonnal kijavítja. A cikket át kéne nevezni úgy, hogy az egész Vajdaságra vonatkozzon. Keress még támogató wikipédistákat, én is megpróbálok. Ezt nem hagyhatjuk annyiban. A világnak meg kell tudnia az igazságot, ha kell felsőbb körökhöz fordulok, de ezt a hazugságot, amit a szerb propaganda terjeszt le kell állítani. Ez a 70,000-es információ kulcsfontosságú lehet. Fogjunk össze az igazság nevében, a világ láthatóan nem szomjazik az igazságra, de mi akkor is megitatjuk vele.

HunTheGoaT 16:30, 01 October 2006 (CEST)

Szia

I was wondering if you could help me with something. I've been in a discussion about the Hungarians of Turkey at Talk:Karapinar. Since you can read Hungarian, perhaps you could answer some of our questions there with this source. Thanks in advance. —Khoi khoi 17:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, try looking for "Macarköy" (the former name of the town), "Feketeforrás", "Magyarfalu", or "Madzsarköj". :-) —Khoi khoi 09:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. Is there any info about a town called "Gebiz"? (see Talk:Karapinar for more info) —Khoi khoi 09:22, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks again for your help! —Khoi khoi 09:27, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fz22

kosz a segitseget :), igaz, most magunkban/magamban levelezek :))--fz22 15:43, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lattam, igen. :) be is fogom rakni, kosz. Ambator soha eddig nem hallottam meg ilyen kezdemenyezesrol, sem arrol, hogy barki felkarolta volna ezt, politikailag ... Udv

A keleti magyar kiralysagrol keveredtem vitaba par topiktarssal es mar torolni is akarjak az oldalt, mondvan hogy nincs ra eleg angol nyelvu bizonyitek. Ha van idod es egyetertesz, pls help ! :) Udv --fz22 10:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hoppa lemaradt a link: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Eastern_Hungarian_Kingdom —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fz22 (talk • contribs) 10:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		I award you the Original Barnstar for your efforts on the English and German Wikipedia, trying to improve the Hungarian-related articles. Thank you.

Thank you very much.

Még egyszer visszaállíthatod a lapot, tedd meg. Ő már nem, mert akkor az lesz neki a negyedik, amiért felfüggesztik a szerkesztési jogait. ;)--VinceB 04:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative divisions of the Kingdom of Hungary

I've been watching your revert war with Juro over the administrative divisions of the Kingdom of Hungary with astonishment. I agree with Juro that this is not really the place for the ethnic composition of the counties. There's at least a lot of data available from the 1910 census, and some of that is already in the individual county articles. If you think an overview of major ethnic groups by county is a good thing to have (and I don't see a reason against it), wouldn't it be a better idea to create an article about the demography/ethnic composition of the Kingdom of Hungary, e.g. Demographics of the Kingdom of Hungary? Markussep 18:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hunadam

Hello, Öcsi! Thanks for your greetings. At the present, I am active in the Hungarian Wikipedia. (My latest contribution was a big part of 1956-os forradalom, which is a candidate for featured article for the next week.) I will contact you when I start to write articles even here, because I will need the help of people with perfect English. --Hunadam 17:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. But for the articles it has to be perfect, so thanks for your help in advance. :-). --Hunadam 18:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kirra Greece

Could you please take a look at the page Kirra Greece that I've created? And could you please edit it? Thank you! Neptunekh 06:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

?????

Hungarians in Moldova

Hi, Öcsi. At first glance, the article you created has several problems, the most stringent of them beng a confusion in terminology (one that is not apparent in Romanian, and I think that is the case in Hungarian as well): there is a major difference between Moldova and Moldavia, and the info there should actually be redirected to a subsection of Hungarian minority in Romania. I want your ok for this move, and I also ask for your permission to rephrase references made to Bessarabia in this context. Note: An article about Hungarians in Moldavia is not a good alternative, for several reasons, IMO (for one, the fact that most of the info would be covered by the article on the Csangos). Please tell me if you object. Dahn 18:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be doing it over the next hours (I'm currently expanding an article). In essence, the difference is that Moldavia is used to designate the region divided between Romania, Ukraine, and Moldova (the latter took the name of the whole region as it is given in Romanian, but this is somewhat abusive - current Moldova is merely a part of Bessarabia, and Bessarabia is about half of Moldavia). In general, the word "Moldavia" is reserved, in English, to the what Romanians tend to call "Moldova" above all others (to avoid confusion, Romanians always refer to Moldova as "the Republic of Moldova"). A rather complicated situation, and very dependant on nuances in English, but not unparalleled (think about the word "Austria" and what it was used to designate over the centuries).

That's it in a nutshell: it gets a bit more complicated - see Moldova (disambiguation) for all the alternatives. Also check out the first map in the article on Moldavia. Dahn 18:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Segíts ismét!

Szia! Gondolom észrevetted, hogy PANNONIAN belekezdett a szokásos kötözködésébe. Kötelességemnek éreztem a délvidéki magyarság ellen elkövetett atrocitások feltüntetését a Magyarellenesség nevezetű szócikkben, természetesen PANNONIAN jó szokásához hűen beleírt néhány szerbellenes atrocitást a cikkbe, hogy azt higgye a világ, mi sem vagyunk jobbak. Nevetséges dolog, hogy a 48-as forradalomra vonatkozó mondatomat megismételte, csak szerb viszonylatban. Felháborító dolog, hogy míg a szerbek halomra verik a magyarokat, a magyarellenesség szekcióban az legyen feltüntetve, hogy ezeknek a támadásoknak a kiváltó oka az volt, hogy 3-4 magyar nemzetiségű(megjegyzem drogos) majd halálraverte a szerb drogdealert. Ezután az áldozat azt nyilatkozta, a támadásnak ellene nem volt nemzeti indíttatása, persze a szerb média és a radikálisok ezt nem így gondolta. Na persze a cikkbe a kiforgatott verziót írta meg PANNONIAN. Segíts harcolni a mocska ellen. Én még1x nem leszek hajlandó semmilyen ostoba kompromisszumra. Gyűjts még támogatókat! Én asszem találtam még1 embert. Tudom, hogy rád ismét számíthatok, tudd, hogy ez fordítva is igaz. Ne feledd a jelszót: A világ nem szomjazik az igazságra, de nekünk akkor is meg kell vele itatnunk, ha belefullad. HunTheGoaT 21:37, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

) Látom te megelőztél az írásba. Már benne is vagyok!HunTheGoaT 21:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pannonian szokásos észjátszása elmaradhatatlan. Figyeld a Serbophobiat meg a Magyarellenességet!HunTheGoaT 18:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rulers of

I'm not sure I understood what you meant, but I was thinking that, in case rulers' names have an "Englishified" version ("John Hunyadi"-style), we should use that. If not, I suggest we go with the Hungarian version (unless some form in, say, medieval Latin does not take precedent). Currently, the names have a Romanian(ized) format, which is POV. Dahn 21:54, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics

"we could make a new article for the demographics themselves. Is this a problem?"

No, it is not problem, but that new article should not be only about 1910 census. It should list demographics for all counties from all censuses in history for which we have data. One more important thing: since 1910 census itself listed languages instead of ethnic groups, I suggest that we too list languages in that new article because anything else would be an opinion and not correct presentation of census results. PANONIAN (talk) 21:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved to the main space at Demographics of the Kingdom of Hungary at Panonian's incentive. I took the liberty to delete your subpage. Duja► 07:39, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Május 8.

Szia! Lehet, van benne valam.:) Hétfő volt azon a napon, mikor megszülettem. Légyszíves add meg az ímélcímedet(oka van annak, hogy helytelenül írtam, majd megírom, miért), ha nem gond. Úgy nyugottabban tudjuk folytatni a beszélgetést. HunTheGoaT 09:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Magyar-fóbia a Wikipedián

Szia Öcsi! Nagyon köszönöm az üdvözlő szavakat az angol vikipedián. Ezzel a Panonian fedőnevű szerb "úrral" nagyon sokat vitáztam már, és ezzel nem vagyok egyedül. Nem is tudom, hogy érdemes-e egyáltalán túl sokat foglalkozni vele, magyar-fóbiája ugyanis, szerintem, felülmúlhatatlan. Émelygek, ha rá gondolok.

Én is éltem Németországban vagy három évet, ott fejeztem be az egyetemet, Münchenben, és nagyon szép emlékeim vannak Bajorországról, meg a németekről általában.

Most Angliában élek. Van egy blogom, ott azért eléggé sok minden kiderül rólam: http://enarcheenhologosz.freeblog.hu/

Kívánok minden jót a továbbiakban is a Wikipedián : --Vedran.b 02:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Természetesen

Nekem az apanyelvem is ez, úgyhogy nyugodtan levelezhetünk magyarul. Nehéz a meggyőződéses barommal, de enged. Én mar majdnem teljesen az ő hülyeségeire szakosodtam, úgy érzem tart is tőlem. Légy résen! Bendeguz 12:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Congratulations!

Congratulations on your recent adoption, Öcsi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I saw that you have expressed an interest in being adopted by an experienced editor. Being an experienced editor myself, I accepted your request. Whether you want to learn about wiki markup, find something to do, or just talk to somebody, I'm the person to see about it - just leave a message on my Rat235478683. Remember, I am willing to help you and make your time here more enjoyable. Feel free to ask me any questions you might have, and remember to "be BOLD!"- I'm here to help you; no question is a stupid one. In the mean time, here are some pages that you might find helpful, in case you haven't already gotten the offical welcoming:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome and congratulations!

It's me

I've been trying to figure it out but since I'm from USA, I don't really know too much about the topic. I'm soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo sorry.--Rat235478683--

Törökül

Jól írta angliai barátunk, hogy a magyar nevektől, kifejezésektől kiütéseket kap, ezért a hivatalos nyelvre hivatkozik, és fordít mindent németre, törökre, deákra. A hülyét a saját bunkójával a legjobb fejbeverni, abból ért leghamarabb. Ez nagyon is vonatkozik rá hiszen az országa a 19. század végéig török gyarmat volt. Még csak ezután - Hofit idézve - "jön a bal". Bendeguz 19:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comedian?

"Norwegians, Makedonians and Czehs are genetically almost the same people"

What is there a comedy? Both, Macedonians and Czechs are Slavs, and as for Norwegians - Slavic, Baltic and Germanic languages are closely related and there is also linguistic theory about Balto-Slavo-Germanic proto-language. So, mister Öcsi, it would not be bad that you read something before saying that some things are comedy. PANONIAN (talk) 13:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aha. From nationalist panslavs. Go, Panonian-Comedian, and tell your lies somewhere else.

Check this: http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=FP-pull-web-t&ei=UTF-8&p=balto-slavo-germanic You have there plenty of sources that speak about Balto-Slavo-Germanic languages and most of the sources are not from Slavic countries. PANONIAN (talk) 15:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There stands only that they speak Indogerman languages, not that they are genetically equal, and that's what your map is suggesting. :}

And the slavic languages are also in a own, seperate section of the Indogerman languages.

Elment a cselszövő?

Nézz már körül. Bendeguz 19:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Szerintem csak blöff, addig marad a kiírás a felhasználói lapján, amig lefut a felhasználó-ellenőrzés és visszatér. --Vince ^{hey, yo! :-)} 00:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hiszi a piszi

Rávakeroltam a mi kicsikénkre. Nevet és nemet cserélt, és e súlyos műtét után egy boldog kislány lett belőle. Ott settenkedik a délvidéki falvak körül, két nekifutásra kétszázon felüli szerkesztése van. Arról lehet felismerni, hogy még nagyon piros az orcája, mivel még üres a felhasználói lapja. Ne hergeld, csak akkor kell a kacsócskájára ütni ha nem vigyáz és odakozmásítja az ételt. Légyszi ne utalj rá! Bendeguz 20:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder for you

This is a warning.
If you continue vandalizing pages/falsifying data, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Juro 01:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Do not use these templates in content disputes; instead, write a clear message explaining your disagreement. --Öcsi 15:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have given the source from the census of 2002, I realized that I was false and didn't revert your edit. If you had shown me the source at once, I wouldn't have reverted your edit then. This is not vandalism, it's only a misunderstanding. --Öcsi 15:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide or have you provided a source for what you have written? You cannot and you have not. In fact, you have openly lied and repeatedly. That is no content dispute, but vandalism. And note that in addition you have deleted a vandalism warning from your talk page, which is another form of vandalism. Juro 17:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You call it lying and vandalism, I call it making errors. It is a content dispute because at least Komárno was right. And I can't answer to your harsh personal attacks, because they are only lies and bad slander!! --Öcsi 19:20, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Try not to make mistakes in the future, or I will consider your behaviour as vandalism too... and of course revert it. Be careful! Watch out! --Öcsi 19:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted your warning, because I did not vandalise, it is only a further personal attack comitted by you and I don't like personal attacks on my talk page. --Öcsi 19:20, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Siza. I'm not sure...he'd just accuse me of being a biased admin, or a "Hungarian facist vandal". Are there any other admins you can think of? Perhaps InShaneee? Khoi khoi 20:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring him isn't going to do anything, why don't you try WP:PAIN? Khoi khoi 20:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so Luna said he'll keep an eye on him, so let him know if he makes any more personal attacks. Hopefully he doesn't. Khoi khoi 20:55, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they're a bit outdated. ;-) Khoi khoi 20:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So, Öcsi, instead of providing any explanation for your deliberate falsification of data in that article and other articles (I am still waiting for the source of all your edits in that article, WHERE IS YOUR SOURCE? ), YOU are accusing ME of vandalism???? And that is not considered a "personal attack"??? And those two "admins" - no comment. This should be put on the main page, so that anybody can see what is possible in this wikipedia.

To be more precise:

Which source (other than you) says that there is a district called Zitny Ostrov?
Which source (other than you) says that there is Hungarian majority in the Galanta district?
Which source (other than you) says that there is a Hungarian majority in the Slovak part of the plain?
See the question on the Little Hungarian Plain talk page.
And, how do you dare to revert corrections of your edits, for which you have no sources whatsoever?

Juro 02:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your source from the census data just proved my thoughts about the question, Which source (other than you) says that there is a Hungarian majority in the Slovak part of the plain?, you only have to count the numbers. :) --Öcsi 13:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See [1], but I guess you have again a new proof (like: it's vandalism ) against my numbers. :( --Öcsi 13:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is absolutely ridiculous. The plain ends where the Carpathians start and there is absolutely no doubt about that (both as a geomorphological, and as an orographical and as a geographic unit) and there is no source claiming the opposite (and this even self-evident, you do not need a source for this). You cannot just pick out districts you like, declare that THEY are the plain and then cite the numbers for those deliberately chosen districts. And I must add that I rarely have to face such ...ity, I am sorry, but that is what your claims always are. And each sentence you add makes you seem more incompetent. Juro 01:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And you have still not answered my above questions. And I am adding another question: Which source (other than you) claims that the Little Hungarian Plain consists of the three districts you have chosen. And ANSWER THIS QUESTION. Juro 01:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Podunajsko [ Danube River region ] (Dunajská Streda, Galanta, Komárno, Nové Zámky, Šaľa) ~ Kisalföld. --Öcsi 12:02, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Podunajsko is NOTHING, no district, no plain, nothing, only a general term for the region around the Danube. But above all it has nothing to do with Kisalföld. Kisalföld is the Podunajská nížina. Juro 17:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, wrong. You even falsify your own edits: The Danubian Lowland (Slovak: Podunajská nížina) is the name of the part of Little Alföld (Slovak: Malá dunajská kotlina) situated between the Danube, the Little Carpathians and all the other Western Carpathians, i.e. situated in Slovakia.

+ cities like Modor (Modra) do not belong to the Kisalföld.

You are getting more an more funny! --Öcsi 19:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: számok

I think it's not really important. The name of the plain says "Hungarian", so it is self-evident that it has to do a lot with Hungarians, and if anyone is interested in the population of any properly defined area within the plain, the links will lead him to the data. It would only need further explanation if there was a majority of a different ethnicity.

If you insist on providing approximate numbers, you'll essentially get in the trouble of having to define how the "best" approximation can be chosen, and then discuss that definition over and over again with every single raving nationalist who happens to pop up and find that article in the future... that's not a battle I'd choose, not even if I were a geography expert having a lot of time on my hands. Regards, K issL 16:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Europas

Unfortunately, there's not much I can do as I'm not an admin over there. I'll ask some other admins for advice, ok? Khoi khoi 22:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Demographic history of Vojvodina

If you think that contents table there is long then you certainly should read much more Wikipedia articles (I saw some with much longer contents tables). Some people perhaps do not want to read data from all censuses, but only data from last one in 2002. Why they have to read the whole article until they find what they looking for when they can easy to click on contents title and they will find that in a moment? PANONIAN (talk) 13:19, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Transylvania

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Portal:Transylvania. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's [[Talk:Portal:Transylvania|talk page]].

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Perel 16:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the speedy notice from the portal you are creating, because it doesn't seem to meet the criteria (there are more than enough potential topics), and because I think it's too early to nominate it for deletion. On the other hand, your portal definitely needs a plenty of work. Please see Wikipedia:Portal and related pages; you'll likely be able to find other users to help you there. - Mike Rosoft 19:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Láttam az ötleted és jónak találom, bár nem tudom melyik irányba elindulni a történelmibe vagy pedig turisztikai, néprajzi esetleg reginális portált létrehozni. Történelminek példa az OMM portálja, igaz, hogy már vagy fél éve hozzá sem nyúltak, mégsem feszigeti senki a létjogosultságát. Bendeguz 15:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Én ezt sem kerestem, hanem rajzoltam egy majdnem akadémikus után. Szerinted mi a kivetnivaló benne?--Bendeguz 20:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha én jó értelmeztem a szerzőt, akkor ahol nincs külön bejelölve az magyarok által lakott vagy magyarok által gyéren lakott terület. Egyébként nincs külön jel sem a magyar lakosság számára, csak a vegyesen, és a szlávok által lakott területekre. Ami pedig a gyepűrendszert illeti, az természetes, hogy a Pannon-síkság szélei felé tendál a védelem egyrészt az időbeni risztás, másrészt a dombos terület alkalmasabb a védelemre. Teszem azt, ha te támadót várnál a házadba, és elhatároztad hogy ellenszegülsz neki, akkor biztosan nem a szoba közepén várod be, hanem a kapunál.--Bendeguz 20:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Megírtam neki a térkép vitaoldalán, hogy mit vagyok képes fájdalommentesen kijavítani, és mit nem. Vagy két napja várom a válaszát. Mi a fájdalommentes és mi nem? A térképrajzolásnak is vannak szabályai, vannak visszavonható rétegek, és van amit jobb újrakezdeni mint ügyetlenkedni, maszatolni. Ezt szeretném elkerülni, ha lehet-bealkudni. Ebben az alkuban pedig benne vannak a túróci szlávok is.--Bendeguz 21:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Székely

Yes, I agree with you, my estimation for the Aranyosszék Székelys was "less than 20,000" in the article. --KIDB 15:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian Wikipedia

Blog: Thanks, I appreciate it.

May I ask if you also edit the Hungarian Wikipedia and if not, why not?

Thanks and Boldog Karácsonyt, 15:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Censuses

Sorry, but I do not have data from older censuses in the KOH. The only data that I have from older censuses is for Bacs-Bodrog county (I do not have even data for Torontal and Syrmia). I can only find 1910 data from this site: http://www.talmamedia.com/ but unfortunatelly I too do not have time now to post this data into article. PANONIAN (talk) 04:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bonaparte

Done. Khoi khoi 02:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beszélj angolul

I noticed that you have posted comments on an article or user discussion page in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you are addressing your comments. This is because comments should be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. —Psychonaut 13:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Clash of Civilizations

Please don't re-add the diff again. Not only is it unhelpful, but it also violates WP:NPA. Also, pelase don't call other users "hungarophobic". Thanks, Khoi khoi 22:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he didn't say Hungarians, he said Hungarian nationalists. But regardless, he shouldn't have said it. The thing is, Öcsi, two wrongs don't make a right. If PANONIAN says something that offends you, you shouldn't go insulting users. Rather, you should remind them of WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. On an entirely different, note, can you please tell me if the German name for Szilágysomlyó is Schomlyo or Schomlenmarkt? Thanks, Khoi khoi 22:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I get frustrated too, but you should probably try expressing your anger elsewhere. I don't think PANONIAN was denying that Serbs have done bad things either. Pretty much every ethnic group in the Balkans has done something bad in one point in time. As for Szilágysomlyó, do you have any sources that call it "Schomlyo"? The only one I could find was the Hungarian Wikipedia. Khoi khoi 01:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, he's tried to do stuff like that here as well, but I've deleted all of his "articles". Yeah, and I was sure it was him too. He got banned there, didn't he? Khoi khoi 05:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basin/plain

Of course, you are right about that - I made some research on Internet myself and found that Pannonian Basin and Carpathian Basin are same, while Pannonian Plain/Great Hungarian Plain/Great Alfold are names for the same plain that is part of the Pannonian/Carpathian Basin. So, I changed now those articles, and I believe that both articles (Pannonian Basin and Pannonian Plain) are now correct. The confusion in Wikipedia about this came from the fact that somebody first wrotte article about "Pannonian Plain", then somebody redirected "Carpathian Basin" and "Pannonian Basin" to "Pannonian Plain" article (that was the basic mistake), then people used "Pannonian Plain" article to writte about both things (Pannonian Basin and Pannonian Plain), and finally somebody created new article named "Great Alfold" (which is just another name for Pannonian Plain, and article about plain already existed). I believe that I corrected all those mistakes now. PANONIAN (talk) 14:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Naming convention

Can you have a look at my last edit in Wikipedia:Hungarian_Wikipedians'_notice_board#Effect_of_the_Naming_Convention_on_Hungarian_settelements_in_neighbouring_countries --KIDB 07:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would be grateful if you followed what is happening on the Székelyudvarhely page. --KIDB 16:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to move Odorheiu Secuiesc to Székelyudvarhely

In case you are interested, there is a proposal to move the Odorheiu Secuiesc page to its native name Székelyudvarhely, similarly to Swedish settlements in Finnland, or German settlements in South Tyrol. For more, see the talk page of the article. Please remember that this is not simply a vote; your comments must include reasons to carry weight. Many Romanian users have already expressed their opinion there --KIDB 06:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sándor Petőfi

Why do you insist toput the hungarian name of Sighisoara in this article? In 1849 the town belonged directly to Austria and the official name was the german: Schäßburg. You can put the hungarian name of the city (Segesvár) in the hungarian Wikipedian, but not here. --Olahus 07:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can put the hungarian name where I want, even on the Romanian wikipedia. And to be precise the town did not belong to Austria in 1849, but to the Revolutionary Kingdom of Hungary. Therefore it's name was Segesvár when poor Petöfi died there. + please stop writing with an intolerant undertone, or I will undo your comments. --Öcsi 12:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL

Hi Öcsi. I'd like to remind you to please remain civil in your discussions with other users at Wikipedia, and to assume good faith. Comments like "Are you stupid? What's about the section "Didn't want to answer"?" and "You should buy glasses." border on a violation of the policies above, and do nothing to strengthen your argument. In short, Wikipedia is a better place without them. Thanks, Ronline ✉ 02:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Transylvania

Portal:Transylvania, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Transylvania (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Transylvania during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 00:16, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]