Jump to content

User talk:Éponyme

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Éponyme, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CWC(talk) 00:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

[edit]

Howdy, I wanted to let you know I removed the comment you made from the RfC page. Generally, the debate should remain on the talk page of the article. I'll see if I can take a look at the talk page, but haven't yet. Thanks, --TeaDrinker 00:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

I have temporarily blocked you from editing for disruptive personal attacks and incivility. When your block is up, comment on content, not on the contributor. Tom Harrison Talk 15:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you earlier to comment on content, not contributors. When working on political articles, incivility becomes disruptive very quickly. Tom Harrison Talk 13:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Warnings

[edit]

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. Paul Cyr 07:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. Paul Cyr 08:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a week

[edit]

You have been blocked for a week for attacks referenced here. User:Gerdbrendel/Brendel stays within the bounds of civility. I would try to follow his example more. Good rule of thumb here is to attack the issue, not the person. If you continue to attack him or anyone else, you will not be here much longer. Take this week off and try to relax. --Woohookitty(meow) 01:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure you quite understand what Wikipedia is and why we're here. Original research is not allowed nor are the constant personal attacks that you make. Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing. And it does apply here. But Wikipedia is a private organization. We have the right to remove things that only exist to attack other people. If we had no rules, then we'd have utter chaos and the entire point of the encyclopedia will have been lost. If you don't believe in those rules and don't want to follow them, that's your choice. But it's also our prerogative to not allow you to post here if you do not follow those rules. It is not "mob rule". Nor are we all "white liberals". Far from it. We have a good amount of conservatives (such as User:Jdavidb) who post here with no problem. It's a matter of accepting why Wikipedia is here and also trying to follow our rules. If you don't believe in them and you refuse to follow them, then you shouldn't be here. Period. Wikipedia is NOT a message board. Nor is it a place where flaming is allowed. You need to accept that or else you shouldn't be here. --Woohookitty(meow) 17:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have no idea what your talking about

[edit]

You may have consensus with Alun on "cultural" issues, but you don't know shit about culture, descent or ethnic identification, so shut the fuck up. As for Enzedbrit and TharkunColl, good for them if they agree with you, thats only four peeps total who are wrong on this issue in most aspects (thought I dont think Tharkuncoll agrees with you as much as you do with Alun since hes not commented much on the issue). Besides the countless number of anons who edit the page and disagree with you, Epf seems to disagree with you and Im lookin forward to what that joker talks about since he seems to have more knowledge on the subject than any of you. So, basically, you can go fuck yourself all I care and your hypothetical "colonial American" descent along with ya. Whatever you are, you are fucking dumb to deny ethnic grouping in terms of genetics, physical appearance and upbringing (thats like your personality, behavioural traits thatare part of your culture), these are passed down from your ancestors fool and this comes from the 5 major human groupings (European/Caucasoid, African/Negroid, East Asian/Mongoloid, Australoid, and indigenous Southern African/Capoid) and their sub-groupings (EUROPEAN: peoples of Britain, Irish, Basque, Frisians, Dutch/Belgians, French, Italian, Iberian, Austro-German/Central European, Scandinavian, Balto-Finnic, Western/Eastern/Southern Slavs, Greek, Turks/Turkic peoples, North African, Egyptian, Arabic, Assyro-Arabs, Armenians, Jewish/Palestinians, Magyars/Hungarians etc.; AFRICAN/NEGROID: Western African peoples, Eastern African peoples, Central-southern African peoples, Bantu Southern African peoples, etc.; EAST ASIAN/MONGOLOID: Northern Chinese, Southern Chinese, Thai, Vietnamese-Khmer-Lao, Burmese, Tibetans, Central Asians/Uyghurs, Mongols/Manchus, indigenous Siberian groups, Koreans, Japanese, Ainu, Malays, Indonesian-Malays, Polynesian/Austronesian peoples, Northern Native American Indians, South-Central Native American Indians, Inuit/Eskimos, etc.; AUSTRALOID: Northern India peoples/Indo-Aryans, Southern India peoples/Dravidians, Sinhalese, Bengali, Andamanese, indigenous people of Madagascar, indigenous Papua New Guinean peoples, Australian aborigines, etc.; INDIGENOUS SOUTHERN AFRICAN/CAPOID: Bushmen, Khoi, San, Xhosa, etc.). Being of colonial American descent, Im guesing you are ethnicity-wise a British-American and/or Dutch-American. So suck on that fool.

You have been blocked for one month

[edit]

Per this. No tolerance for racist, personal attacks and you've been blocked in the past. --Woohookitty(meow) 10:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense Edits to Implant Racist Statements Must End

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Ethnic_group, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

See Compare Doc. of Vandalism. ~ Louis waweru 17:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Éponyme, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Trollcentralpark.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Éponyme. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]