User talk:"Captain Phenomenal"

Warning

I warned you on your Phenomenal Decay account that you will get blocked if you keep this up and you did. Now I'm doing the same again. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 16:03, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to WWE Women's Championship (1956–2010)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

"Captain Phenomenal" (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey, why did you block me. Please unblock me. I will do nothing again i promise you. I beg you, please. Forgive me Lord/God in heaven. Jesus Christ "Captain Phenomenal" (talk) 16:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You were blocked here under another account. You cannot just create a new account to get past the block. If you want to make an unblock request you have to do so on your original account User:"The Phenomenal (Decay). HighInBC 17:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Gogo Dodo: I am reviewing this block. The user in the link in the block log does not exist. A typo perhaps? Can you help me understand this block, what was the other account? Or is there behavioural evidence? HighInBC 17:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@HighInBC: The extra quotation marks confused me. The account is "The Phenomenal (Decay)" (talk · contribs). I corrected the tag. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. All is clear now. HighInBC 17:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Captain, why did you blank and then try to delete the article WWE Women's Championship (1956–2010)? HighInBC 17:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@HighInBC: and @Gogo Dodo: I'm sorry about that. I do because 2 WWE Women's Championship ([1] [2]) have 2. That's why? 1) 2010 and 2) 2016. I try it to put all in one WWE Women's Championship. Sorry again. I will not do again. And May God Bless You. "Captain Phenomenal" (User:"Captain Phenomenal")

Articles are often split into two when they get too large. Thanks for your explanation, however it is not our primary concern. HighInBC 17:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This editor certainly looks like "The Phenomenal (Decay)" (talk · contribs) engaging in block evasion. I endorse the block. --Yamla (talk) 17:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]