Jump to content

User:Yanlauwong/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



PLEASE NOTE THIS PAGE HAS BEEN CREATED AS A DRAFT AND IS NOW AWAITING REVIEW AT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Tribunal_(League_of_Legends)


The Tribunal is a system developed by Riot Games, in which eligible members of the League of Legends community are empowered to review potentially negative behaviours.[1] Deployed in May 2011[2] the main objective of the system is to reinforce the importance of the tenets held within the Summoner’s Code to promotes positive behaviour among players.[3][4]

The Tribunal
File:Thetribunalpic.png
Image of Tribunal first launched by Riot Games
DeveloperRiot Games
TypeOnline Behaviour evaluation System
Launch dateMay 2011
Platform(s)PC
Statusin Recess
MembersJeffrey Lin
Websitehttp://www.leagueoflegends.com/tribunal/en/

How the system work

[edit]

The system build cases based on reports received by players who have been consistently negative over a large number of games. [5] The case is built on the most frequently report received by the player, prior reports of the same nature will not be considered, only similar reports post the creation of the case will be taken into account and added to the case.

Community judging

[edit]

Any members of the League of Legends community, Summoners, who are post 20 in level (formally 30) and not banned from participation can review cases. [3] Summoners receives points, known as Justice Rating, based on how often they vote towards the majority of the votes on the case. [6] [7] On the contrary, players loses amount of these Justice Rating if their vote coincide with the minority of the case. Losing large amount of Justice Rating can result in losing access to the Tribunal system, this is a way to encourage reviewers to carefully read the situation instead of blindly voting to punish players.[5]

Type of report

[edit]

Violation of the summoner's code and considerable punishments can be classify as the following:[8]

  • Harassment: Offensive Language
  • Harassment: Verbal Abuse
  • Griefing: intentional Feeding
  • Griefing: Assisting Enemy Team
  • Inappropriate name
  • Leaving the Game/AFK
  • Negative Attitude
  • Refusing to Communicate with Team
  • Spamming
  • Unskilled Player

The weight of a report can also vary dependent on the credibility of the person who filed the report, a positive player's report would weight more against a player who abuse the system by constantly reporting. [3]

Type of punishments

[edit]

The system assigns different level of penalties to players based on the severity of the case. The punishment serve to discourage the behaviour or act from happening again.
Punishments includes:

  • Warnings
  • Suspensions
  • Name changes
  • Permanent banning

Low level punishment are carried out automatically by the system while more severe cases can sometime lead Player Support to manually assign punishments. [3] Punishment are not by anyway influenced by the number of votes in a case, rather the frequently of the player being punished.

Reviewing cases

[edit]

Tribunal deploys a community base judging process, as members of the League of Legends community who are post 20 in levels are given rights to vote in a Justice review.

Justice review

[edit]

All cases on the system judged or skipped, the end result and how consentaneous the decision was can be viewed in the Justice review, additionally Summoners can revisit each cases to view the resulting punishment assigned. Each case are presented to reviewing Summoners in sets of evidence, these evidence includes: [3]

  • Report reasons and comments
  • In-game chat log
  • Per player statistics and inventory
  • Date, time, map
  • Mode for each individual game from which the case is built.

The Justice review also acts as a report card for contributing Tribunal members, providing details on judgement accuracy and other information that determines how effective their voting has been.[9]

Statistical point

[edit]
Tribunal information
Image representation of tribunal effects

On May 25, 2012, Riot released the following Tribunal metrics:[10]

  • More than 47 million votes have been cast in the tribunal.
  • 51% of tribunal cases result in a guilty verdict, with only 5.7% earning a permanent ban.
  • 74% of players warned by the tribunal just once never end up there again.
  • Over 700 individual cases were personally reviewed by Lyte and Pendragon.


On December 21, 2011, Riot released the following Tribunal metrics:[2]

  • 1.4% of all players have been punished by the tribunal.
  • Over 50% of all punished players never re-offend.
  • 94% of players who receive enough reports to face the tribunal are punished by their peers.
  • Average player reports for the average one-time offender: 11
  • Number of player reports accrued by the average repeat offender: 70
  • Offenders lose games: 24% of offenders are on the winning team. 76% of offenders are on the losing team.
  • Offenders make bad team-mates: 71% of offenders are reported by their own team. 29% of offenders are reported by the enemy team.
  • Over 16,000,000 total votes have been submitted.
  • Over 80,000,000 influence points has been rewarded to voters.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Tribunal Home".
  2. ^ a b Scimeca, Dennis (16 May 2013). "Using science to reform toxic player behavior in League of Legends". http://arstechnica.com/. Retrieved 31 May 2014. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help)
  3. ^ a b c d e "Tribunal FAQ". http://na.leagueoflegends.com/. Riot Games. Retrieved 31 May 2014. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help)
  4. ^ "Summoner's code".
  5. ^ a b Chipteck (Feb 20, 2014). "Tribunal FAQ". https://support.leagueoflegends.com/. Riot Games. Retrieved 31 May 2014. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help)
  6. ^ Kou, Yubo; Nardi, Bonnie (2013-02). Regulating anti-social behaviour on the Internet: The example of League of Legends. iConference 2013: iSchools. pp. 616–622. doi:10.9776/13289. Retrieved 31 May 2014. {{cite conference}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: location (link)
  7. ^ Tarcanus (29 January 2013). "Tribunal Judgement: Reviewing the Actions of Fellow Summoners in the League of Legends Community". http://www.frostbournestudios.com/. Retrieved 31 May 2104. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); External link in |website= (help)
  8. ^ "Reporting a Player". https://support.leagueoflegends.com. Riot Games. 8 May 2013. Retrieved 31 May 2014. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help)
  9. ^ "League of Legends Tribunal". http://gamezroomx.wordpress.com/. 24 May 2011. Retrieved 31 May 2014. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help)
  10. ^ Tang, Stephanie (17 May 2013). "League of Legends: The Science of Politer Players". http://www.gameskinny.com/. Retrieved 31 May 2014. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help)


[edit]

North America Tribunal
Europe West Tribunal
Europe Nordic & East Tribunal

Category:Electronic sports games Category:Fantasy video games Category:Free-to-play video games Category:Multiplayer online battle arena games Category:Multiplayer-only video games Category:OS X games Category:Video games developed in the United States Category:Windows games

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Yanlauwong/sandbox&oldid=650650897"