User:Wugapodes/assessment
Appearance
Usage
[edit]"other" is the only optional argument.
{{User:Wugapodes/assessment | well-written = is the prose good? | structure = does the article have good structure? | understandable = is the article accessible to non-experts? | sourcing = inline citations, references, etc | coverage = does the article cover the topic? | npov = is the article free of npov problems? | figures = does the article use aproppriate supporting material such as images and tables? | other = anything else you took into consideration? | rating = what rating did you give it? | comments = suggestions for improvement }}
- Prose Quality
- Well-written is the prose good?
- Structure: does the article have good structure?
- Understandable: is the article accessible to non-experts?
- Verifiability: inline citations, references, etc
- Coverage of Topic: does the article cover the topic?
- Neutral Point of View: is the article free of npov problems?
- Supporting Material: does the article use aproppriate supporting material such as images and tables?
anything else you took into consideration? Overall rating: what rating did you give it?
suggestions for improvement