User:Wikicleric

RESURRECTION PLANET Hello, I am probably posting this in the wrong place, but I'm a little lost. Re: your deletion request for "Resurrection Planet," I have reviewed the arguments that Wikipedia allows me to use and, to get past the jargon, I simply would like to point out that this particular book, while not being a bestseller or an Academic tome, does have a unique contribution to make. It is a rather unusual blend of religion, politics, and sci-fi horror purposefully designed to help readers past the typical post-Apocalyptic thrill ride and make a more thoughtful consideration of just what might happen if the Messiah delays His return until men have moved on to other planets (admittedly, an unlikely event in view of the way our world is self-destructing). Anyway, while I appreciate your concern for preserving the sanctity of Wikipedia, I think you might like to compare the Resurrection Planet entry to about...oh, I don't know...maybe a thousand other entries that certainly seem more commercial than this one. Andy, whatever you think, could you transplant this rebuttal to wherever it's supposed to go?  ;) Thanks. --Wikicleric.