Jump to content

User:Whiteguru/Shen Long

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk:Sheng Long/GA2

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch


Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessment will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 21:42, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

 

Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment


Observations

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
   HTML document size: 116 kB
   Prose size (including all HTML code): 19 kB
   References (including all HTML code): 40 kB
   Wiki text: 24 kB
   Prose size (text only): 12 kB (2141 words) "readable prose size"
   References (text only): 6649 B
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  • Article follows manual of style.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • The Origin section and the Original EGM April Fools 1992 section don't have enough citations to carry the text. There is too much back-story and explanation.
  • EGM April Fools 1997 section is the same; it does not have enough citations to carry the text. There is too much back-story and explanation.
  • These matters were raised in a Video Game Assessment in 2008 and have not since been addressed.
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  • The significance and extent of the April Fool's hoax has been somewhat stretched out in this article.
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  • Page created 6 June 2005;
  • Page has 785 edits by 255 editors and has 36 page watchers;
  • The Internet Archive Bot has visited 4 times;
  • 90 day page view statistics give 7,329 visits with a daily average of 81 views.
  • Article listed as GA: January 16, 2009
  • Examination of page history shows stability, and no edit warring. Edits address Japanese language and translations.
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  • File:SF Sheng long.jpg = fair use is claimed under US Copyright law. (fair use rationale is appended)
  • File:ShengLongEGMScan.jpg = fair use is claimed under US Copyright law. (fair use rationale is appended)
  • File:Sf4-gouken.jpg = screenshot from a video game = fair use is claimed under US Copyright law
  • Images are appropriately tagged and have fair use rationales.
  1. Overall:
  • It is challenging to say this article is neutral considering it portrays an April Fool's joke played out three times in the Street Fighter video gaming environment.
  • The origin of the April Fools joke predates the Internet and social media; the in-joke was perpetrated twice in magazine interviews and print media and flopped a third time.
  • The hoax's general reception from the public and other publishers was to eventually meet ridicule from video game competitors.
  • There is too much back-story and explanation in sections of this article (without sufficient citations) to merit GA status.

 

 On hold for one week. --Whiteguru (talk) 03:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)