Jump to content

User:Whiteguru/Providence and Worcester Railroad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 19:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)


Starts GA Review. The review will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 19:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

 

Talk:Providence and Worcester Railroad/GA1

 

Observations

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
   HTML document size: 172 kB
   Prose size (including all HTML code): 30 kB
   References (including all HTML code): 59 kB
   Wiki text: 36 kB
   Prose size (text only): 18 kB (2980 words) "readable prose size"
   References (text only): 7985 B
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  • WP:Proseline: Despite this, the company quickly began to make a large profit upon opening, thanks to the large amount of traffic it carried
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  • Copyvio check picks up names of railroads; else, all is fine.
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • Page is "readable prose size";
  • Lead is crisp and sharp.
  • Founding section is good with the history and links to the Blackstone Canal.
  • Trains magazine not giving access to reference 17... Reference 21 does a lot of back-filling
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  • Neutral point of view is presented.
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  • Page created 9 January 2005
  • Page has 309 edits by 127 editors
  • Majority of annual edits in October 2021
  • 90 day page views = 3249 views, with a daily average of 36 views
  • Other than bots reverting financial links, page shows very few instances of vandalism and steady improvement
  • page is considered stable.
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  • File:P&W 4006 Baltic CT.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
  • File:Providence and Worcester Railroad logo.svg = fair use claimed = fair use under the Copyright law of the United States.
  • File:Providence and Worcester RR 1909.jpg = is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.
  • File:Route of the Providence and Worcester rail road (11839037763).jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
  • File:Providence and Worcester Railroad line within Salt Rock State Park, Sprague, Connecticut.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
  • File:Middletown, CT - rail tracks east of Main St 01.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
  • File:ProvWorc10.1.05.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
  • File:Providence and Worcester freight train in Pawtucket, June 2008.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
  • All photos have fair use rationales and are appropriately tagged.
  1. Overall:
  • The Ghoul Express? my, my, Halloween will never be the same.
  • Reference 17 is indeed referential to the expansion days; however Reference 21 gives significant backfill as well. Well sourced.
  • All clear apart from the minor prose matter mentioned above.

 

 Passed

 

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Whiteguru/Providence_and_Worcester_Railroad&oldid=1061188568"