User:Whiteguru/Oneness Pentecostalism

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 11:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Oneness Pentecostalism/GA1

Starts GA Review. The review will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 11:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

 

---

Observations

   HTML document size: 305 kB
   Prose size (including all HTML code): 52 kB
   References (including all HTML code): 148 kB
   Wiki text: 80 kB
   Prose size (text only): 32 kB (5233 words) "readable prose size"
   References (text only): 21 kB

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

• Are there too many links in the Lede? See MOS:LEAD

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

• Reliable sources used.

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

• The link the lede to Modalistic Monarchianism is both important and informative.
• The link to church history is not informative
• The section 'Background of Oneness theology' holds together really well. It is clear and not confusing in its exposition.
• Oneness views on the early church → consider the clarity of this section and the utility of citing Tertullian directly.

1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

• Remarkably, given attempts to put personal points view into this article, stringent page watchers have been able to preserve neutral point of view for this article.

1. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

• Page created 27 July 2003
• Page has 153 watchers of whom 15 are page watchers who visited recent edits.
• Page has 2,954 edits by 859 editors
• Page has 18 generic rollbacks...
• 90 day page views = 30,012 with a daily average of 330 page reads.
• 46 reverts for the first 500 edits. Some reverts are edit warring over doctrine and theology.
• 34 reverts for the next 500 edits.
• Another 14 reverts from page creation.
• That's 94 reverts. Most reverts are over doctrine. Citations. Church History.

1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

• Page has one image: Basic Latin cross; fair use rationale is present.

1. Overall:

• Good work in presenting Oneness baptism, Oneness theology. A strong preservation of the doctrinal presentation of this form of Pentecostalism is given.

 

 Passed