Jump to content

User:Whiteguru/Lynton and Barnstaple Railway

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

 

Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessment will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 08:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

 

Talk:Lynton and Barnstaple Railway/GA2

 

Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment


Observations

[edit]

This is a GA Reassessment: so a truncated set of observations...

  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  • Page created 23 May 2005
  • Page has 686 edits by 234 editors
  • 90 day page views = 3,602 with average of 40 visitors daily
  • 16 edits reverted
  • Page has 39 watchers.
  • Internet Archive Bot has been on page twice - last visit tagging no links as dead;
  • Cluebot NG has not visited, indicating no vandalism; page considered stable
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  • 11 images on article
  • all fair use rationales accepted, images have appropriate captioning
  1. Overall:
  • Basically, this page is in a Good Article shape and form. However, this page records the restoration of a closed narrow gauge railway in North Devon, UK, and should be updated on a regular basis. With 39 watchers, this should not be a difficult task. Below are some observations that may merit attention - and possibly inclusion - in various sections, such as Present, Restoration and Prospects.

 

The greater sense is if these matters are attended to, the article will retain GA status. --Whiteguru (talk) 04:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

 

 On hold

 

Lynton and Barnstaple Railway has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

Editors notified on 25 April 2022

  • Ross Burgess
  • Redrose64
  • Peter Horn
  • Lynbarn