User:Wavelength/Miscellaneous information/Discussions
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 113#Defining consensus (section 20) 18:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 113#Achieving consensus (section 21) 18:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 113#Lapses in consensus (section 22) 18:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 113#Recording consensus (section 39) 18:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 118#Obstacles to consensus (section 34) 15:23, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 118#Acknowledgement and validation (section 35) 20:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 118#Policy discussion containment (subsection 35.1)
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 118#Guidelines which have consensus (section 31) 16:09, 13 December 2010]] (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 118#Quality of arguments (section 39) 19:42, 14 December 2010]] (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 119#Defining consensus (for other style guides) (section 13) 00:01, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 119#Achieving consensus (for other style guides) (section 7) 00:01, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 119#Lapses in consensus (for other style guides) (section 8) 00:01, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 119#Recording consensus (for other style guides) (section 14) 00:01, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 119#Collaboration and dissent (section 22) 22:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 70#Collaboration and dissent (section 60) 02:54, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 9#Collaboration and dissent (section 41) 15:40, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2011 January 12#Correction and embarrassment (subsection 1.9) 21:33, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2011 January 18#Correction by schoolteachers (subsection 1.6) 22:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- The idea was to have thousands of volunteers writing articles for an online encyclopedia in all languages. Initially we found ourselves organising the work in a very top-down, structured, academic, old-fashioned way. It was no fun for the volunteer writers because we had a lot of academic peer review committees who would criticise articles and give feedback. It was like handing in an essay at grad school, and basically intimidating to participate in.
- (permanent link here for 02:48, 16 January 2011)