Evaluate Your Article: Bamboo Mud Wall 15 Nov

The article does not exist yet.

I would add its history, origins, construction methods, variations, examples, restoration and reinforcement.

And add citation from dissertations from Japan and Taiwan, for example:

Article Evaluation: Bungaroosh 8 Nov

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

The last sentence about etymology has some distracting information.

I think more photograph is needed, now there is only a close-up shot.

Sectioning. Now it is a big trunk of paragraph.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

It is neutral.

The viewpoints are saying this is distinctively from Brighton and Hove area, which is not strongly supported.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

Some original links don't work anymore, but all of them have archived webpages. The source do support the article.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

Informations are from non-profit surveys, which are relatively more reliable and neutral.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

There are none.

It is rated start-class and low-importance. It is part of WikiProject Brighton and WikiProject Architecture.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Not about the content but about how to present it