User:Victor Lopes/Brazil and the Wikipedia systemic bias
This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
As some of you may know, Wikipedia has a (quite big) problem with systemic bias, specially when it comes to geographical differences. Obviously, because this is the Anglophone Wikipedia, users are more likely to come from Australia, UK, US, etc. However, English is a widely spoken language, which means people from all around the world may contribute to keep the balance between Anglophone and non-Anglophone points of view.
For a Lusophone nation, I'd say Brazil has a quite good coverage at Wikipedia, maybe because of its position as a leader among developing nations, or maybe because of its worldwide famous culture. Important topics, such as the economy, geography, history, climate, society, etc, have all a comprehensive article here. Actually, there are articles covering Brazil-related topics that I've never heard about (e.g., the France Équinoxiale).
However, minor articles such as low-populated cities (unknown even to me), particular regional festivals and culture, etc, may be doomed to receive contributions from those cities inhabitants/lovers only, which often leads to POV, advertising, travel guide-like sections, etc. At least once a week, I find myself cleaning up travel guide content from Brazilian places' articles.
Concerning the different points of view each subject may have depending on the geographical location, we can say that Brazilian ones are in general well expressed, mainly because Brazilian society, opinions, "way of life" and laws are much similar to the ones found in the Western civilization. There are indeed significant differences, like the date of the Valentine's Day (June 12 foir Brazil, February 14 for most of the world), which are fully expressed in their respective articles (well, that's not really relevant, but you get the point).
WikiProjects on the different countries of the World are the best way to compensate this bias, and to promote the creation of non-Anglophone material. If you feel there's something missing here on your homeland, then join the related WikiProject and go for it.
This essay ends here. It may be edited/expanded at any time. Feel free to comment on this at the talk page, or to (briefly) express your ideas on your country's coverage in Wikipedia.