Jump to content

User:VesuviusVivace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About Me

[edit]

Hello! I'm VesuviusVivace, a dedicated Wikipedia editor who values accuracy, neutrality, and the spirit of collaboration. My primary goal is to contribute positively to the encyclopedia, helping to maintain its status as a reliable and comprehensive source of knowledge. I firmly believe in the Wikipedia motto: "Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge."

Morale:

  • Integrity: Above all, I strive to ensure that my contributions reflect verifiable and accurate information. I aim to approach every edit with an open mind, grounded in evidence and reliable sources.
  • Respect: Wikipedia is built on collaboration, and I always treat fellow editors with respect, even when we disagree. Constructive dialogue is key to building a better encyclopedia.
  • Commitment to Free Knowledge: I am motivated by the idea of creating freely accessible knowledge for everyone, regardless of who or where they are. This drives my passion for improving articles and keeping Wikipedia a trusted resource.

Editing Philosophy

[edit]

I adhere strictly to the principles outlined in Wikipedia’s Five Pillars:

  • Neutral Point of View: I prioritize balance in all articles I work on, ensuring no single perspective dominates. All significant viewpoints, sourced from reliable references, are reflected proportionally.
  • Verifiability: I never add information without first verifying its accuracy through reputable sources. I frequently cross-check details to maintain the highest standards.
  • No Original Research: I do not speculate or inject personal opinions into articles. All information I contribute is grounded in existing, credible research.

My Editing Standards

[edit]
  • Source Quality: I always aim for high-quality, reliable sources (e.g., academic journals, reputable books, news outlets with a track record for factual reporting). In cases where I’m uncertain about a source's reliability, I consult Wikipedia's reliable sources guideline or discuss it on the article’s talk page.
  • Precision: I avoid vague language or ambiguity, and I strive for clarity in every edit. The information should be easy to understand while remaining accurate.
  • Consistency: I make sure to follow established formatting rules, citation templates, and style guidelines (such as those in the Manual of Style). This ensures uniformity across articles, making Wikipedia easier to navigate for both readers and editors.

My Editing Procedures

[edit]
  1. Research Thoroughly: Before I start editing an article, I conduct extensive research using high-quality, trustworthy sources.
  2. Edit Summary: I always use an edit summary to describe my changes. This promotes transparency and helps other editors understand the rationale behind my edits.
  3. Cite Sources: Every fact I add to an article is supported by a citation to a reliable source. I use the appropriate citation style to make sure sources are clearly presented and easy to verify.
  4. Discussion and Consensus: If I am making a significant change or adding controversial content, I engage in discussion with other editors on the article’s talk page. I believe in building consensus and respect Wikipedia’s community-driven approach to content creation.
  5. Reverts: I avoid reverting changes made by other editors unless absolutely necessary, and always provide a clear explanation in the edit summary or the talk page if I do. I focus on finding solutions rather than escalating disputes.

Areas of Interest

[edit]

My primary areas of interest include:

  • [Insert topics of interest: History, Science, Technology, etc.]
  • Improving the quality of articles with missing citations or poor sourcing.
  • Expanding underdeveloped stubs or creating new articles in underrepresented fields.

Tools I Use

[edit]
  • Twinkle: I use Twinkle for reverting vandalism and maintaining article quality quickly and efficiently.
  • Citation Bot: I often rely on Citation Bot to help tidy up and format references.
  • AutoWikiBrowser: For repetitive tasks across multiple articles, I use AWB to ensure efficiency without sacrificing accuracy.

What I’m Working On

[edit]
  • Expanding underrepresented sections on [insert specific Wikipedia topics].
  • Cleaning up orphan articles by finding appropriate links to integrate them into related content.
  • Improving the neutrality and sourcing of contentious topics.

Contact Me

[edit]

Feel free to leave me a message on my Talk Page if you have any questions, feedback, or concerns. I’m always open to constructive discussion and happy to collaborate!