User:Trankhayla

[[Article evaluation - Buddhism ]]

• Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Yes, everything in this article is relevant to the topic by explaining the peace upon the individual.
• Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, the article has neutral head and did not drawn any bias information.
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, there were not any points that was overrepresented everything was really straight forward.
• Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes, the links works and the sources claims did supported the article.
•  Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?  The information in these sources came from wikipedia. May books and stories had been written towards this topic.
• Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? Most of the information is correct due to my knowledge.
•  Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?  The conversations deals with the different types of paths and the difference between the religion compared to others.
• How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? This article about Buddhism is rated at a level 3 virtual article. How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? The details are more precise and gives a better understanding to the topic.