User:Tonyr8669
Evolution and Genetics for Psychology
1)The significance of Darwinism
[edit]Evolution is the central explanatory theory of biology the divergence between humans and chimpanzees is quantitative not qualitative at one point there was a shared grandparent
1.1) What problems does the theory of evolution solve?
[edit]Two major problems were solved by Darwin's theory of evolution: 1 The problem of history 2 The problem of design
1.1.1)The problem of history
[edit]similar bone patterns of vertebrates although they have different functions similar biochemical make up of cells proteins cytochrome c: made up of amino acids 104 different amino acids and same amino acids appear across species rather than not common themes with different "local" variations
Hierarchical organization in nature
[edit]if two species are similar in one detail they are more likely to be similar in another detail different species are groups together based on their shared attributes as the hierarchy goes deeper the more divergent the species become from each other Why? This is the problem of history
Solving the problem of history
[edit]Solutions: 1) different animals have always been different people always people monkeys always monkeys this cannot explain hierarchical organization Darwin : Gradual modification Phylogeny = family tree
Why does modification occur - natural selection
1.1.2)The problem of design
[edit]Creatures seem well designed for the tasks they have to perform The body has many systems that perform special tasks An engineering supermodel
Design in nature:bat echolocation
[edit]echolocation appears only when it is needed - in the dark or in murky waters energy inefficient
design oddities in nature
[edit]appearance of useless structures
solving the problem of design
[edit]a) why are there so many good design structures in nature too complex for chance pre-Darwin - a design agent problem - unparsimonious: no evidential explanation problem - non - explanatory: where does the complexity of the designer come from
b) why are some structural designs useless if the designer were that complex and brilliant why create a useless organ such as the whale pelvis
Darwin's solution to the problem of design
[edit]The cumulative effects of natural selection during evolution
Natural Selection The non random survival of useful innovations that, cumulatively can lead to what seem to be well designed structures parsimonious and explanatory vestigial structures - visible
1.2)Evolution by natural selection in a nutshell
[edit]Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection involves Four elements:
1) Variation: There are minor characteristic variances in individual organisms.
2)Heredity: The varied characteristics are passed down from the parents to the offspring.
3)Competition: Some parents leave more offspring than others, some offspring die early, individuals have a different number of offspring that represent what the parent leaves behind.
4)Natural Selection: The offspring that bear advantages due to their characteristics will survive and those that have characteristics that have no advantage will die off.
Useful characteristics are cumulative and the longer the characteristic stays useful the more species will adopt the advantageous trait. - Think about the different organs of our senses, the eye the ear the nose each of these are marvels in engineering, yet gradually came about due to their selective advantages rather than always being there.
Being a useful characteristic enabling survival solves the problem of design as these particular traits were build up slowly and steadily. These slow and steady building blocks are called adaptations.
Homologies and analogies
[edit]The problem of history is solved by natural selection as cousins of the original will populate differently with different designs and different adaptations over time(as Dawkins calls it - up the mountain of probability).
Darwins theory of evolution identifies two types of similarity in nature:
- homologies
- analogies
1. homologies: These are the similarities that species have that came from a common origin.
i.e human hands and bat wings
Homologies reflect historical constructs for different species
2.analogies: These are the characteristics that vastly different species share in order to cope with their environment.
i.e streamlined shapes that are shared between whales and sharks that have a large degree of variance in the amino acids contained in their proteins but both serve to move through water with ease.
The conceptual power of Darwin's theory
[edit]Darwin's theory is based on a process that does not reflect either X: due to chance, X: due to intention, or X: due to a super all powerful designer.
Instead it explains structures in nature differently.
1.3)Incorporating genetics:The modern synthesis
[edit]The theory of natural selection was based upon transmissible components passed from parent to offspring and this is why individuals varied but during the time that Darwin was writing it was thought that heredity was a mixture of characteristics that were a combination of the two parents. At the same time a monk by the name of Gregor Mendel was exploring the possibility of hereditary particles that are passed down from one generation to the next. Rather than a blending of characteristics these were individual particles, genes, that were carried by the offspring and passed down to the next generation.
After a long time it was shown that the Mendelian idea was the reason that natural selection is possible. This is what is known as The Modern Synthesis .
Natural selection being the changes in the relative frequencies of different forms of genes in the population over the generations. In other words they are independent yet intertwined.
1.4)Common objections and misunderstandings
[edit]There are many misunderstandings about what evolution amounts to in the world
1.4.1) Evolution is just a theory
[edit]The word 'theory' can mean that one has an idea about something but there is not any scientific evidence to support it.
In evolutionary terms this is not what is meant by the word 'theory'.
Theory in evolutionary terms means something a lot more technical and scientific.
"A body of principles that explain phenomena in the world and that are used to make particular predictions about them".
Another misunderstanding is that we cannot see evolution happening so it cannot be true.
Organisms with short life spans can be observed to refute this claim such as the finches of the Galapagos islands and the sizes of their beaks. Beak size is heritable and those finches with larger beaks on the islands with an environment that necessitates a larger beak size will survive longer and have a greater chance to reproduce.
1.4.2) There are gaps in the record
[edit]Fossil records show that there can be enormous gaps of time between one species and another that are said to be in some way related but this gap means that you cannot be 100% sure.
Fossil existence only proves that evolution actually happened: The evidence more comes from the homologous patterns and adaptations of species so gaps do not disprove anything. One can look at the different species of whale that have a pelvic bone and is completely useless in their underwater environment showing that a previous generation of these whales must have walked on land at one point in time.
1.4.3)The theory of evolution says living things arose by chance
[edit]1.4.4)It all happened so long ago, who knows, and who cares?
[edit]Summary & Questions
[edit]10)Our place in Nature
[edit]10.1) Reconstructing the tree of Life
[edit]10.1.1) The species concept
[edit]====grey areas: the genus Canis
species in time
[edit]10.1.2) Higher Taxonomic units
[edit]10.1.3) Establishing phylogenies
[edit]an example: the place of the whales
[edit]the molecular clock revisited
[edit]10.1.4) Fossils
[edit]Fossil whales
[edit]Fossil flatfish
[edit]10.2)humans as primates
[edit]10.2.1)The primate phylogeny
[edit]10.2.2) Humans are apes
[edit]The gibbons, or lesser apes
[edit]The orang-utans
[edit]The gorillas
[edit]The chimpanzees
[edit]The ape phylogeny
[edit]10.2.3) Hominins: human ancestors after the human-chimpanzee divergence
[edit]The australopithecines
[edit]Origins of the genus Homo
[edit]====The archaics
10.2.4) Origins of Homo sapiens
[edit]History of modern humans since their origins
[edit]===10.3
11)Evolution and Contemporary Life
[edit]11.1)Human Evolution is still going on
[edit]11.1.1)Ongoing Selection in the Human genome
[edit]11.1.2)Ongoing Selection at the phenotypic level
[edit]11.1.3)From genotype to phenotypic consequence: DRD4 in the Ariaal of Kenya
[edit]11.2)Evolution leaves a legacy
[edit]11.3)The place of evolutionary theory in the explanation of current behaviour
[edit]11.3.1)Tinbergen's four questions
[edit]11.3.2)An example: Human infant crying
[edit]11.3.3)Evolution in relation to the human sciences
[edit]11.4)How should cross cultural variation be explained
[edit]11.4.1)Evoked culture
[edit]11.4.2)Transmitted culture
[edit]11.5)How much of our behaviour is adaptive
[edit]11.5.1)Evolutionary Psychology:Behaviour adaptive for the ancestral environment
[edit]11.5.2)Human behavioural ecology:Behaviour adaptive for the current environment
[edit]11.5.3)Gene-culture co-evolution:Adaptive social learning
[edit]11.5.4) Synthesis
[edit]Summary & Questions
[edit]break
[edit]3)Propositional Logic 2=
[edit]Introduction
[edit]3.1) Formal Systems
[edit]3.1.1) The Language
[edit]3.2) Theorems
[edit]3.3) Uniform Substitution
[edit]3.4) Theorem and sequent Introduction
[edit]3.4.1) The rule of Theorem Introduction (TI)
[edit]3.4.2) The rule of Sequent Introduction (SI)
[edit]3.4.3) Sequents and Theorems Proved so Far
[edit]====3.4.4) Some additional sequents and Selected P====roofs
3.5) Effectiveness
[edit]3.5.1) Arithmetizing the Syntax
[edit]3.5.2) Translating the symbols of L
[edit]3.6) Validity
[edit]3.6.1) The interpretation
[edit]3.6.2) Constant truth functions
[edit]3.6.3) Substitution-instances
[edit]3.6.4) The number of n-ary truth functions
[edit]3.7) The strong soundness of L
[edit]3.7.1) The Strategy of the Demonstration
[edit]3.7.2) The proof in detail
[edit]3.7.3) Consequences of strong Soundness
[edit]3.8) The Strong Completeness of L
[edit]3.8.1) The special Case of tautologies
[edit]3.8.2) Weak Completeness: the constructive proof
[edit]3.8.3) Some examples of canonical proofs
[edit]3.8.4) Strong Completeness
[edit]3.8.5) Consequences of Completeness
[edit]4)Quantificational Logic 1
[edit]4.1) The inadequacy of Propositional Forms
[edit]4.1.1) n-place predicates
[edit]4.2) Quantificational Rules
[edit]4.2.1) Introduction
[edit]4.2.2) The rule of universal Elimination (UE)
[edit]4.2.3) The rule of Universal Introduction (UI)
[edit]4.2.4) The rule of Existential Introduction (EI)
[edit]4.2.5) The rule of Existential Elimination (EE)
[edit]4.2.6) Some useful sequents with quantifiers
[edit]4.2.7) Nested quantifiers
[edit]4.2.8) Some examples of arguments
[edit]4.2.9) On representing English Conditionals
[edit]5)Quantificational Logic 2
[edit]5.1) The Formal System Lq
[edit]5.1.1) Atomic wffs
[edit]5.1.2) The set Þ (Þq) of wffs
[edit]5.1.3) Propositional functions
[edit]5.2) The Rules of Lq
[edit]5.2.1) UE and EI
[edit]5.2.2) UI and EE
[edit]5.3) nLq-theoremhood Preserving Operations
[edit]5.3.1) Lq theorems
[edit]5.3.2) Uniform Substitution in Lq
[edit]5.3.3) Variable replacement and alphabetic variance
[edit]5.3.4) Term replacement
[edit]5.4) Models for Quantificational Logic
[edit]5.4.1) Propositional Models revisited
[edit]5.4.2) Truth values of quantified sentences
[edit]5.4.3) Validity
[edit]5.5) Determining Validity
[edit]5.5.1) A second example
[edit]5.6) First order theories
[edit]5.6.1) The first order theory of identity
[edit]5.6.2) Sequents involving identity
[edit]5.6.3 Expressing distinctness and number
[edit]5.6.4 Defining descriptions
[edit]5.6.5 Superlatives
[edit]5.7) First-order Theories of Relations
[edit]5.7.1) Enthymemes
[edit]5.7.2) Some additional notation
[edit]====5.7.3) n-ary relations and their Properties