User:Theepicosity/GAList
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- a. (reference section):
- b. (inline citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- e. (source spot-check):
- a. (reference section):
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass, fail or on hold:
- Pass, fail or on hold:
Usage
[edit]{{subst:GAList2
|overcom=
|1a=
|1acom=
|1b=
|1bcom=
|2a=
|2acom=
|2b=
|2bcom=
|2c=
|2ccom=
|2d=
|2dcom=
|3a=
|3acom=
|3b=
|3bcom=
|4=
|4com=
|5=
|5com=
|6a=
|6acom=
|6b=
|6bcom=
|7=
|7com=
}}
Available arguments are y, n, aye, nay, wtf, and ???; some synonyms are also available for these arguments. Any other argument or no argument at all gives an undecided mark.
The comment lines ("com") are used for additional notes. If no comment is included, the comment line doesn't appear. This is also true of "overcom", which allows for general comments before the subsections.
Note that the template should be substituted, as the GA guidelines are reviewed from time to time and this template may be changed.
Example
[edit]{{subst:GAList2
|overcom=This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
|1a=y
|1acom=Well done.
|1b=y
|2a=y
|2b=y
|2c=???
|2ccom=Some of the information in the third section appears to be OR.
|2d=y
|3a=y
|3b=y
|4=y
|5=
|6a=n
|6b=y
|7=n
|7com=I wish you good luck with improving this article!
}}
results in:
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Some of the information in the third section appears to be OR.
- D. No copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused (see summary style):
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- I wish you good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
Troubleshooting
[edit]If you are seeing exposed raw wikicode when using this template, it's probably because you have not used substitution in the template call. Use of subst: in calls to this template (as seen in the "Usage" and "Example" sections above) is required for this template to work correctly.
See also
[edit]- {{GAList/check}}