User:The Utahraptor/April Fools 2012 Joke RfA

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

The Utahraptor's sock

Final (11/5/1); ended 21:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC) Rcsprinter (deliver) 21:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination

The Utahraptor's sock (talk · contribs) – I won't be very active on Wikipedia for a while, but my legitimate alternate account says he's gonna pick up the slack. And I figured, "Why not nominate him for adminship? Seems like he'd make a dang good admin!" ;) Happy April Fools Day! The Utahraptor^Talk/_Contribs 02:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Yes The Utahraptor's sock (Talk)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: I'll delete stuff and block people ;)

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: Probably the work I've done for my main account.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: Plenty. I'm a bad boy. ;)

25. Like me, do you not know how to count?

A: Nope

Thomas Jefferson's bed. Do you like non sequiturs?

Banana: Sure?

42. Argyle or stripey?

A: Definitely stripey :)

1125. Fruits or vegetables?

A: Neither; like my main account I am a carnivore. ;)

4. Do you have any sockpuppetry accounts to disclose? --Rschen7754 07:43, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

A: I have about three million; if I'm made an admin I'll block all of them. ;)

General comments

• Links for The Utahraptor's sock: The Utahraptor's sock (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for The Utahraptor's sock can be found here.

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

I'm pretty sure there's a typo in the application. "Darn" good makes much more sense. This lack of attention to detail does not bode well. Josh Parris 02:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Discussion

Support

1. Support because he wears toe socks. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:12, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
2. Sock - We need more with his go-get-im attitude. CycloneGU (talk) 02:40, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
3. Support Based on thoughtful answer to Q42. --joe decker^{talk to me} 02:54, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
4. Support x100 While I can't publicly support a sock, I pledge the support of all the hundreds of illegal socks I will create someone will create when I become he or she becomes a rogue editor.Cloveapple (talk) 03:37, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

   

   Beware the carnivorous sock!

5. Supper I hope this is the right place to vote. Don't worry I am your friend leg. --leg04:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
6. Support Because we needs moar carnivorous sox. -- ►►—Ninja Diannaa—► ^(Talk) 04:48, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
7. Support Good Faith vote that it's not smelly :). --Kangaroopowah 05:27, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
8. Support per answer to Q1. I want all articles larger than 10,000 words deleted and anyone who writes a vanity article indefblocked. This is the sock for the job. --Stfg (talk) 08:23, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
9. Support Stud! Pol430 talk to me 11:12, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
10. Support Looks cool! --SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 12:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
11. FooLSupporT again! -- ɑηsuмaη ^{ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ} 16:48, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose Rather unfit for the sock... erm, mop. Bulldog73 ^talk da contribs _{go rando} 02:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

   Yeah, it barely even fits around my clawed foot. ;) The Utahraptor^Talk/_Contribs 02:37, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

2. Strong Oppose - A master candidate like you should go for Beurocracy. Yasht101 :) 03:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
3. Oppose - It's not a puppet.--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
4. Oppose - Stockings are deprecated. I'll !vote for the hound instead. Rivertorch (talk) 05:29, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
5. Oppose - I hate to sound prejudiced, but I saw the photo of you, and I don't like your color. We don't need any more rouge admins. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:59, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Comment If the shoe fits, wear it! PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 17:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Wash

1. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 17:26, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.