User:TheMickyRosen-Left/Talk Page Archives/Bad Edits
Reverted destructive edits to "NewPipe"
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to NewPipe, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 19:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- Why was this removed? I did rely on primary sources such as github PRs and FAQs from the website, but I can't think of any other source that would mention peertube and mediaccc support. Without this contribution, the information displayed there would be out of date— Preceding unsigned comment added by TheMickyRosen-Left (talk • contribs)
- I undid your edits because they were disruptive and destroyed the article. Please learn how to contribute to Wikipedia before editing. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 14:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- Destroyed the article? In what way did adding 2-3 sentences which are factually correct and a notes section destroy the article? Instead of directing me to the entire wikipedia policy, please tell me what I did that was against the policy. All I can think of is verifiability (there were a few primary sources). TheMickyRosen-Left (talk) 14:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oh yes, and WP:RS . But unreliable sources isn't the same as destroying an article TheMickyRosen-Left (talk) 14:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)s
- Please review your edits to NewPipe. Compare it with the the previous version. If you cannot see how your edits destroyed the article, please do not edit Wikipedia again until you can. It could be dangerous. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 00:19, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
- I see what happened now. I made a mistake and a citation ended up at the start of the article. Instead of reverting my changes and saying I destroyed the article, why couldn't you point out what I did wrong and only removing that one change?
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TheMickyRosen-Left/sandbox/Newpipe - TheMickyRosen-Left (talk)
- Please review your edits to NewPipe. Compare it with the the previous version. If you cannot see how your edits destroyed the article, please do not edit Wikipedia again until you can. It could be dangerous. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 00:19, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
- I undid your edits because they were disruptive and destroyed the article. Please learn how to contribute to Wikipedia before editing. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 14:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- Is this better? Removed the one sentence that was destroying the article. TheMickyRosen-Left (talk)
- Can I get confirmation to now update the article? Considering that it is quite out of date, I have updated it and removed the part that was "destroying the article". I'll update it in 10 hours. TheMickyRosen-Left (talk) 09:09, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have updated the article again. This time I did not delete the infobox or add a citation at the start of the article. I reviewed the changes before submitting to make sure only changes I want to submit were submitted. Thanks for your help, but please do not be so condescending to new users next time. TheMickyRosen-Left (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2020 (UTC)