Thanks for the guidance on maintenance templates. One more quick question related to your answer, would you consider a template as relating to maintenance, and tags for deletion? I think I may be using the wrong verbiage in my posts.
Sorry for the confusion. It's really not a big deal, I was just looking for some verbiage clarification. In my initial request I asked about tagging a article, and was simply looking for a way to identify the page as having problems, not to delete it. Being new here, I think I mixed up tags and templates, and was just trying to work through the specifics. Thanks Threehundredthirtyseven (talk) 13:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
It seems there are a lot of articles for bus stops, such as Pleasant Park Station (OC Transpo). Could we delete some of these for complete non-notability, in your humble opinion?:) Merkin'smum 23:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
For fixing the AfD. You E/C'd me to it :) (And I alone in being really disappointed in the quality of these college essays? Oh well :\) Thanks again, --Bfigura(talk) 03:08, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Oh, it's been done. See User:Globalecon/Global_Economics and User talk:Globalecon. Apparently the students aren't reading the giant banner I stuck up there. They're all loading them individually, which I suppose is at least one policy that's being followed. I'm almost tempted to add <blink> tags to the sucker. (That or stick a gold star by the one good essay, and frowny faces next to all the ones that have been deleted / are at AfD / have been redirected). --Bfigura(talk) 03:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Omghgomg's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yeah, I suppose you can make a redirect. σмgнgσмg(talk) 06:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
I understand you are just stating your opinion. I just hate the tone of that page. It isn't what Wikipedia stands for. Look at the first discussion. RoyalBroil changed his opinion from Keep to Merge because of a lack of material to build a page that could stand on its own. I really would like to see the page merged and the sales stuff deleted, but that tag has been up there for weeks and nothing has been done about it. I don't have the power to merge it. If you want, I'll work with you to do it. Are you an admin with the power to do that, or do you have the connections to get it done? I'm not trying to annoy people, I'm just trying to get this page noticed. Otherwise its just going to stay the way it is for months longer. Thanks! -GoHuskies9904 (talk) 00:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
==thank you T-PH==Stonewhite 00:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.
If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 02:56, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't know how it qualified to be GA ever with all those primary sources aka unreliable sources.--Otterathome (talk) 21:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
If you want to increase your changes of passing your next RFA, you should remove the Uncy userbox from your user page. And stop thinking you are the otter-king, when you are not.--Otterathome (talk) 09:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
It's expected with communities of this nature.--Otterathome (talk) 19:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey there, I saw you and some other folks do non-admin closures on AfD debates. If I wanted to do conclude an AfD discussion with a non-admin closure, how would I go about doing that? Is there a template or code to do that? Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the info! Ecoleetage (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I did my first non-admin closure [1] - but I have a problem - the article you gave me on non-admin closure didn't say how to dispose of deleted articles. It only stated how to preserve articles that were marked for kept. How do I get rid of the speedily-deleted article? Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 18:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
I've seen non-admin closures as Delete votes -- I didn't know what happened after the closure itself. So I should just leave the article alone? Or did I goof up? Ecoleetage (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Well, my first Non-Admin Closure wasn't quite a success. Better luck next time, I guess. Thanks, again, for your input. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey, fellow country music fan, I could use your input on this page about this 80s band: [[2]] -- feel free to edit/improve/Wikify this article. Your input is most welcome! Cheers! Ecoleetage (talk) 21:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
They were quite good - closer to rockabilly than Nashville-brand country. You can find their recordings if you hunt around -- it's worth seeking out. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Please stop removing categories from my user page. I don't care if they've been deleted--they shouldn't have been. I want them there. Kurt Weber (GoColts!) 22:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Although this article has been at WP:FAR for over a week, you don't appear to have completed the nomination instructions at FAR (step 6); please do so, and post the notice back on the FAR page. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
I nominated an article about a Tribbles/ Star Trek card game for deletion, based on a lack of notability (could only find a single source that qualified as non-trivial, the rest were ebay listings, blog entries or trivial mentions). Three people have implied that this AfD is completely off base, and notability is not the issue here. Wanted to know what you thought about it? Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 21:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
On 9 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Raleigh Springs Mall, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Hihi...just wanted to let you know, all the stuff you SK'd today is from the same band that you said the stuff wasn't notable enough yesterday :) I tried to prod per WP:Music but the fan author contested the prod...so no choice but to AfD the lot. [[3]]...figure you can change one way or th'other on that one....no skin offa me either way, just stumbled on the mess tried to clean it up. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 02:42, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
I've been away a while and only recently realized you nominated Jill King for deletion (and replacement) a few months ago. I don't mind, as looking at it, my article (on a local Chicago fine artist) was not particularly notable, whereas yours on the singer is more so. Artemis-Arethusa (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Ehrm, yeah I took it in stride. It was a reasonable edit. Are people really that touchy about these things? Artemis-Arethusa (talk) 17:34, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. :) For the moment, I've redirected this to the artist as is suggested at MUSIC as it does seem a valid search term, even if the album isn't notable. If you really want it deleted, of course, there's no good reason not to, and I'll respect your wishes. I just wanted to suggest that maybe this would be equally okay and might make it less likely, if the album is really non-notable, that somebody will find it missing and create a new page. Your call. I don't mind your reverting my edit if you want it handled the other way. Hope all is well with you. Cheers! --Moonriddengirl(talk) 18:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Fattyjwoods(Push my button) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
. Hi just to make sure you’re not too hungry, I would’ve given you milk – but the cow just died and I tried to milk the bull but it kicked me in the face. *sob*. Anyway, enjoy the cookie!! Fattyjwoods(Push my button) 01:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
You were very quick, while I was trying to figure out the last step you finished everything. Thank you very much. --Gulmammad (talk) 03:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Notsosilent.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand why the Mumbo Token article was deleted. I clearly put on the Talk Page for the article that I wrote the entire thing myself, and therefore it was not an infringement of copyright. I have all the original files on my computer, including version 1.0, version 2.0 and all versions up to the current version. I am going to reupload the article since I AM THE COPYRIGHT OWNER. Avengah (talk) 15:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Billboard archives are correct; "Listen to Your Woman" peaked at #63. "Black Dresses" also charted, but only reached #70. Eric444 (talk) 13:07, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
but I removed your "support" for an Rfa that is not yet transcluded, namely this. We're waiting for the co-nom from Pedro. Happy to have you support once transcluded though. Thanks otter man, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 01:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
It's live now if you still feel like adding your ottersense. :-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 14:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I added it because it's the only way we can make WP:HAU work. You won't have to have any sort of status bot update on your userpage, you just need to be in the category so StatusBot will update User:StatusBot/Status/TenPoundHammer and display whether you are online or offline at WP:HAU. Useight (talk) 04:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey Tenpound... knowing your history and how well qualified I think you are for adminship, I thought I would drop you a quick note. I truly believe that you SHOULD be an admin, you've earned the tools. That being said, I strongly advise patience. Don't let somebody goad you into running again until at least 6 months after your last RfA. Get some distance and let others see that you can wait. If somebody offers it to you, politely turn them down. Wait until at least September, then consider it. (This is the same advice I've give H20--another person I feel is qualified and ready for adminship.)Balloonman (talk) 16:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
You may recall me from the Foiba discussion. Do you know the exact method to propose this orphaned article Directive 80/181/EEC for deletion. The author Duncan Griffin--who is registered--hasn't made more than 2 contributions for Wikipedia (his second is a minor redirect) and the article has been orphaned for almost a year. The articles looks tedious and highly bureacratic. I don't think Wikipedia needs an article on every EEC bill. The problem is I have to place the Afd catalogue on the article and then notify Mr. Griffin. I don't know how to do the second step sadly. Can you suggest what to do here, please. Thank You. Artene50 (talk) 21:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank You for your help Artene50 (talk) 00:05, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Dear Sir, I've nominated Directive 80/181/EEC for deletion but can't seem to be able to the link to give my reasons why. Can't you correct my error? I'm an amateur here..unlike you. Regards, Artene50 (talk) 00:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks sir or Madam, You're a godsend! Artene50 (talk) 00:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Bobby. I didn't know nominating an article for deletion was so tedious...and bureaucratic. Oh well. Live and learn! Artene50 (talk) 00:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Currently, the page title is "The Neeley School of Business at TCU" and I'd like to delete the "The" but I can't find any directions on how to accomplish this. Thanks for any guidance you can provide.Box298530 (talk) 21:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice. However, the tabs at the top do not have "Move Page" as an option. The tabs consist of: Article, Discussion, Edit this page, History, and Watch. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Box298530 (talk • contribs) 14:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
hello. You removed a cat from a page. May I ask why? Thanks. Here's a diff. working in partnership program was part of the UK Department of health cat. Many thanks. Kind reagrds. Dan Beale-Cocks
Ah ok. Thanks for the quick reply. I'll check a bit more carefully before I ask. Kind regards. Dan Beale-Cocks 22:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to see the AFD go through, because then we have just cause to protect the title via {{G4}}. Otherwise this user will just keep recreating it. - CobaltBlueTony™talk 16:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
The intro makes it seem like the Galleria just added movie theatres and a food court. They were redesigned, but not new.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
I am unfamiliar with recent work, but it has always had one of the biggest multiplexes in the city.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Just make sure your text makes it clear that this theater replaced the old one somehow. Are you from Buffalo?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Pictures would improve the article greatly and make it a very likely promotion. I still think it is a pretty likely promotion with a good reviewer. I have not read much other than the WP:LEAD very closely however.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight (talk) 04:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
It is kind of finicky, so if you go several minutes without editing, it'll say you're offline. If I'm not mistaken, the bot will check your contribs every 5 or 6 minutes and see if you made any edits within the last 15. If you have any sizeable gaps in your editing, it'll change you to offline. Just keep editing and check back to see if it changed you to "online." If it doesn't, let me know and I'll take a close look at your case. Right now I have to check on bibliomaniac15's and see why it's not working. If your doesn't change, you'll be second on the docker. Useight (talk) 04:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo kessel.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice. However, the tabs at the top do not have "Move Page" as an option. The tabs consist of: Article, Discussion, Edit this page, History, and Watch.
Currently, the page title is "The Neeley School of Business at TCU" and I'd like to delete the "The" but I can't find any directions on how to accomplish this. Thanks for any guidance you can provide.Box298530 (talk) 21:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Ohhh... crap. Fixing now if you haven't already.— DædαlusT@lk/Improve 19:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
I did mean well. I didn't know that the length of time a business has been around was grounds for notablity. I may have accidently tagged Dom's because it was in list, and I wasn't thinking clearly at the time. Back to the issue of notablity, besides being a large chain, is there anything else that does make it notable?— DædαlusT@lk/Improve 22:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
First I shall say that regardless of whether they are owned by Safeway or not does not determine notablity, as it is not inherited. Secondly, looking over the secondary sources and the general structure of the article, it seemed the sources were just articles on the store's history; they didn't say why it was notable.— DædαlusT@lk/Improve 22:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Notsosilent.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
