Tamara Von H.

...about my general interests:

I am currently an active Wikipedia user for 5 years , not just 4 months, editing and contributing edits.

I am interested in various subjects from science, politics, shows, cinema, fashion, art, pop culture, history, Human rights , LGBTi rights , Trans rights , sexism,

and critized to feminist , toxic feminist , hipocresy on feminist , performativre fake feminist , critized Radical Feminist and critized TERFS and many others.

one of my interests is writing in different languages.

Biographies of fashion models, designers, photographers, and the world of fashion and trusted reliable sources.

Delving more about the contributions I make on Wikipedia, in the last time I have been dedicating my time to edit and improve articles that deal with models of HIGH FASHION or Haute couture, sadly the media and social networks have completely ruined the reputation and idea regarding modeling work or what qualifies you to be a model demonstrating a dangerous childhood favoritism towards plastic surgery and body dysmorphia and even more serious they have lost all work ethic.

The most reliable and viable sources for model bios is and has always been since 1998 “THE FASHION MODEL DIRECTORY“ FMD !!!!! At present it is the only source of prestige that has moral integrity and professional objectivity regarding the work of models and public figures in the world of fashion !!! and it is basically the largest online registry and database and files regarding the work of models and the world of fashion ( knockout to you NO-MODELS.COM).

...in a sadly way , ignorant editors on the model theme , are many times tee nage and not-so- teenagers amateur and this ^"amateur editors" insist that a site with such a bad reputation as MODELS.COM is the only source, WHICH IS NOT SO, of course it is not a bad site, but MODELS .COM lost all objectivity and moral ethics regarding the work of the models and they do not hide in their favoritism and obsession to promote plastic surgery and body dysmorphia what has led that site to have the worst reputation,

just the idea that they make elections and awards with votes Fraudulent to choose who is the best model according to their judgment it's an insult and shows the lack of objectivity, because it is no mystery that they choose those plastic trash celeb people who are convenient for them to promote them and benefit economically and from the media, which is something that the big fashion brands They do not like it at all, because fashion holding companies do not like the idea of having to pay for extra advertising and less if it is models.

Therefore, MODELS.COM is not an authority, much less a trusted source. You cannot trust a site that in 1999 published Gisele's romances with Dicaprio and Josh as if it had a relevance in fashion, or that a few years ago ranked models in order from best to worst, generating models for them. damages in their work, because imagine being the model number 50 !!! And what to speak of the horrible promotion of trash celebrities with plastic surgeries.

Of course, there are other reliable sources when it comes to editing model biographies are the Conde Nast publishing group magazines: Vogue international, Harpers Bazaar, Elle, etc. or other editorial publications outside of Conde Nast. and in recent years new sources and sites have appeared that make a great contribution to the community in an objective and professional way, such as the case of "FASHION GONE ROGUE".

Current and Future contributions articles, proyects in Wikipedia

.- SEXISM and Feminists TERF critics.

.- TRANSGENDER INFORMATION , their human rights and science investigation.

.- fashion models biographies contribution:

Claudia Schieffer , Natalia Vodianova, Luna Bijl , Anok Yai , Grace Hartzel , Mica Argarañaz, Grace Elizabeth , etc , they articles need help.

.-ages of history contributions (decades).