User:Taha Danesh

Hello, my name is Taha. I contribute to both the Persian and English versions of Wikipedia. As a student of humanities, I have a keen interest in a wide range of topics including history, politics, geography, religion, mythology, sociology, philosophy, law, philosophy of law, and occasionally, scientific subjects like defense industry.

I firmly believe that personal biases and beliefs should not influence scientific research, a sentiment shared by many. However, the challenge lies in the varying definitions of prejudice, beliefs, and scientific text and research held by individuals, groups, ideologies, and so forth. Each entity, regardless of its size, confidently upholds its definitions, often leading to criticisms from other groups for perceived interference of prejudices in scientific research. Today, liberalism is the dominant school of thought. Its widespread acceptance has influenced the majority of the society, including other schools of thought. This influence is largely due to its victory in the Second World War and its subsequent promotion through media, politics, and education. However, this school of thought, like any other, is not without its flaws. Its definitions and views on various matters are not comprehensive and this school of thoughts definitions and views of the relation of this matter are not complete and has great flaws and by other definitions of the said matters or even maybe by its own definitions is interfering ideology and prejudices in scientific researchers. This interference is been made to be overlooked due to its control over powerful mediums like media and politics.

This platform is no exception. Despite its merits, it sometimes exhibits bias. My goal here is to contribute truthfully, without letting my personal benefits influence my understanding of the truth. While my understanding may be incomplete or incorrect, I strive to edit and write based on what I perceive to be right, without letting my personal benefits interfere. I believe that someone who defends a misunderstood concept with genuine reasoning is preferable to someone who understands the truth but only defends it for personal gain. Everything I write is open to debate and and could be uncomplete and wrong, I welcome any corrections or challenges.