User:TDAVILA21/sandbox/Taser X2 Defender

This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs
This page was last edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) 15 months ago. (Update timer)

Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request an experienced editor review it for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

The TASER X2 Defender is one of the non-lethal conducted electrical weapon (CEW) models that is used by law enforcement agencies and by civilians as a use for self-defense. It was created by TASER International, Inc. in 2011 after their popular X26 model. What makes the X2 Defender so much different than any other previous CEW is the fact that it can shoot two cartridges and is semi-automatic.^[1]

How it Works

The X2 Defender is a projectile weapon that works by firing two electrically charged probes that pierce through the clothes of a target, creating neuromuscular incapacitation (NMI) of the body. The X2 can hold up to two replaceable cartridges, each holding two probes. Each "Smart Cartridge" has a circuit board that activates the cartridge to shoot out the two probes with gas pressure when it receives a signal. Unlike early CEWs, the main function of the X2 Defender does not operate under the principle of pain compliance so even people with high pain tolerance cannot resist the effects of the CEW, but if that does not work there is a backup function that enables a Drive-Stun mode in which the electric current does follow the principle of pain compliance and physically forces the target to submit. The X2 is used somewhat like a handheld pistol. They both have a similar design, and have similar features like a trigger, a safety lock, and aiming sights.

Safety

The X2 Defender releases a voltage of 1400 volts and a current of 3.5 amperes in an average load. To ensure safe handling, the electric current only lasts a maximum of 5 seconds for every activation and can be equipped with a video camera and a data recorder. The electrical circuit is powerful enough to disrupt the sensory and motor nerves of a target, but is considered safe by Taser International, and by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).^[2] General safety concerns and incidents have drawn criticism to all CEWs in use since they were made. Even though the CEWs are nonlethal, they can still cause people to die because of accidents while targets fall.

Functions and Features

The X2 has numerous amounts of functions and features. It has basic functions and features that help the user operate it like a flashlight, a central information display (CID), extended battery life, battery indications, self-diagnostics, a warning arc, and dual aiming lasers. If you add a camera, the X2 can also be linked to EVIDENCE.com which captures your camera videos as evidence for whenever you use the X2. The CID shows the user everything from which cartridge is activated, to which mode the CEW is in, and to how much battery life is left. The warning arc is a warning display of electricity at the front of the X2 that can be activated by holding the ARC switch. The warning arc is mainly used to convince a suspect to withdraw without actually deploying the cartridge. The X2 is found to be especially useful when the user misses, because the second shot is always the backup that can complete the electrical circuit if a probe did not hit the target.^[3]

Specifications

The X2 Defender has an effective range of 4.6m (15ft). The operating temperature range and storage temperature range is -4 °F (-20 °C) to 122 °F (50 °C). The X2 Defender’s dimensions with the battery pack (length x width x height) are 7.8″ (19.8 cm) x 1.7″ (4.3 cm) x 4.2″ (10.7 cm) and it weighs 454 grams with two full battery cartridges.^[4]

Law Enforcement Uses

The effectiveness and safety in using CEWs as a tool to bring down targets has brought the attention of most police agencies. The X26 and M26 models were the first advanced TASER models commonly used by law enforcement, and the X2 and X3 models came after and are increasingly being used because of their advanced semi-automatic feature. In a large metropolitan police department over a three year study (2002-2004), the estimated success of an effective TASER incapacitation and arrest was 85 percent out of all TASER uses.^[5] Police agencies use CEWs so much because they seem to be overall safer to use while bringing a suspect into custody. The Police Executive Research Forum has found that the use of CEWs has significantly reduced suspect and officer injuries for situations where the use of force was necessary. Not all police agencies are run the same, but most of them use CEWs.^[6]
There have been many incidents that have brought major concern and criticism about police officers misusing CEWs. They were either caused by accidents that occurred while the use of force was necessary, or by police officers using CEWs at an event where it was unnecessary.

References

^ Nystrom, Paul (2012). "The Conducted Electrical Weapon: Historical Overview of the technology". Atlas of Conducted Electrical Weapon Wounds and Forensic Analysis. pp. 1–23. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3543-3_1. ISBN 978-1-4614-3542-6.
^ Panescu, Dorin (3 - 7). "Electrical Safety of Conducted Electrical Weapons Relative to Requirements of Relevant Electrical Standards": 5342–5347. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
^ "TASER X2 User Manual" (PDF). 2011: 1–37. {{cite journal}}: |first= missing |last= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^ "TASER X2 Defender". TASER International Inc.
^ White, Michael (May 2007). "The TASER as a Less Lethal Force Alternative Findings on Use and Effectiveness in a Large Metropolitan Police Agency": 170–191. doi:10.1177/1098611106288915. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)
^ Holder, Eric (May 2011). "Police Use of Force, Tasers and Other Less-Lethal Weapons" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)

External links

example.com

[1] Nystrom, Paul (2012). "The Conducted Electrical Weapon: Historical Overview of the technology". Atlas of Conducted Electrical Weapon Wounds and Forensic Analysis. pp. 1–23. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3543-3_1. ISBN 978-1-4614-3542-6.

[2] Panescu, Dorin (3 - 7). "Electrical Safety of Conducted Electrical Weapons Relative to Requirements of Relevant Electrical Standards": 5342–5347. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

[3] "TASER X2 User Manual" (PDF). 2011: 1–37. {{cite journal}}: |first= missing |last= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[4] "TASER X2 Defender". TASER International Inc.

[5] White, Michael (May 2007). "The TASER as a Less Lethal Force Alternative Findings on Use and Effectiveness in a Large Metropolitan Police Agency": 170–191. doi:10.1177/1098611106288915. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)

[6] Holder, Eric (May 2011). "Police Use of Force, Tasers and Other Less-Lethal Weapons" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]