User:SurreyJohn/sandbox

Uses in popular culture (original)

Often articles about works of classical music are sometimes edited along the following lines:

Work X was used in [movie/TV show/electronic game] Y.

Such edits should be discouraged, they are usually of little interest to readers who want to know about the musical work, and would be of greater interest to readers who want to know about the movie, TV show, or electronic game. For instance, viewers of these items often would like to know what music they are hearing. Except in extraordinary circumstances, contributions of this sort should be politely reverted. It may be useful to encourage the contributor to include the item in the article about the movie, TV show, or electronic game, if this has not already been done. See also: Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections.

Uses in popular culture (revised)

Classical music often gets reused in popular culture, thus forming part of its modern history. This can often make a hitherto unfamiliar work more popular. Therefore, where the music being described has had significant prominence in a popular film, long-running TV commercial, pop song, or other subject, then its use should be described. Try to include the part of the music used, where or how it was used, and in which year. Ideally its use should be supported by citation (see WP:PROVEIT).

A long list of indiscriminate uses should be avoided (see WP:INDISCRIMINATE). However, if information is otherwise suitable, then it is better that it be poorly presented than not presented at all (see WP:TRIVIA).

Please refer to the "in popular culture" essay for further guidance.

5 Pillars

1. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia (WP:ISNOT):
   1. It combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers.
   2. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, an advertising platform, a vanity press, or an experiment in anarchy or democracy.
   3. It is not an indiscriminate collection of information, or a web directory.
   4. It is not a dictionary, a newspaper, or a collection of source documents, although some of its fellow Wikimedia projects are.
2. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view (WP:NPOV):
   1. We strive for articles that document and explain the major points of view, giving due weight with respect to their prominence in an impartial tone.
   2. We avoid advocacy and we characterize information and issues rather than debate them. In some areas there may be just one well-recognized point of view; in others, we describe multiple points of view, presenting each accurately and in context rather than as "the truth" or "the best view".
   3. All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable, authoritative sources, especially when the topic is controversial or is on living persons. Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong.
3. Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute (WP:COPYRIGHT):
   1. Since all editors freely license their work to the public, no editor owns an article and any contributions can and will be mercilessly edited and redistributed.
   2. Respect copyright laws, and never plagiarize from sources. Borrowing non-free media is sometimes allowed as fair use, but strive to find free alternatives first.
4. Editors should treat each other with respect and civility (WP:CIVIL):
   1. Respect your fellow Wikipedians, even when you disagree. Apply Wikipedia etiquette, and don't engage in personal attacks.
   2. Seek consensus, avoid edit wars, and never disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point.
   3. Act in good faith, and assume good faith on the part of others.
   4. Be open and welcoming to newcomers.
   5. If a conflict arises, discuss it calmly on the nearest talk pages, follow dispute resolution.
   6. Remember there are 6,909,862 articles on the English Wikipedia to work on and discuss.
5. Wikipedia has no firm rules (WP:IGNORE):
   1. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines, but they are not carved in stone; their content and interpretation can evolve over time.
   2. Their principles and spirit matter more than their literal wording, and sometimes improving Wikipedia requires making an exception.
   3. Be bold but not reckless in updating articles, and do not agonize about making mistakes.
   4. Every past version of a page is saved, so any mistakes can be easily corrected.