User:Street Scholar/archive1
archive page one.
I've removed the db-attack tag you placed on this page. Deletion of other people's pages is not an acceptable means of dispute resolution. Try and talk to the other user, or offer a nice cup of WP:TEA. Thanks, --Bfigura (talk) 23:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Age is not a valid reason under the CSD, especially when you have such a strong WP:COI. Please use dispute resolution, or at the very least, start an AfD, so other people can evaluate the need for deletion. Otherwise, it'll look very much like a bad faith speedy. (Since it appears to be an abortive RfC, which would in theory have a valid existence). Thanks, --Bfigura (talk) 14:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- After looking into the matter, you're right: RfC's can be deleted after 48 hours if no other user has endorsed them. (See WP:RFC#Request_comment_on_users). That was the case here. I'm not sure that a db-attack tag was the right way to do this, but since the policy in question isn't clear, I don't know what the right thing to do would have been. So, to resolve it, I'm going to prod it (since I don't think speedy applies). Best, --Bfigura (talk) 16:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Your RFA
[edit]I'd suggest you pull it per WP:SNOW. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 19:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hey Street Scholar. I hope this doesn't come across as too patronizing coming from one of the opposers. I just wanted to say that I'm sorry your RFA turned into such a bloodbath and I hope that you will continue to contribute constructively to Wikipedia.--Chaser - T 19:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
RfA
[edit]Hi Street Scholar. I'm sorry that your RfA went so negatively. However, I've notice that you've continued to edit it after withdrawing your nomination, and have posted personal attacks there (as shown in this diff). Per WP:NPA, I'm asking you to please refrain from this behavior. --Bfigura (talk) 20:54, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
I reviewed you. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 13:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)