User talk:Stevenwikikaplan

This user is a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet of Redlightgreenlight as established by the user's edits, and has been blocked indefinitely.

See contribs — page moves — all logs — block log

Welcome!

Hello, Stevenwikikaplan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 01:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of maintenance tags

Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. Seraphimblade 08:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not revert changes other editors have made without discussion on the article's talk page. This may be seen as disruptive. Seraphimblade 08:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Palatten

Absolutely you have time! Maintenance tags don't call for an article's deletion, they just ask other editors to come help with things the article needs. Glad you came over to put the stuff up. There are a couple reasons I was concerned about the contact information and the like-firstly, we don't allow promotion of businesses here, and generally placing contact information other than a single official website is seen as such, and we also have no permission to post the employees' email addresses and the like. Seraphimblade 20:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question from my talk page

I'm not the one who placed the notability template on your article, User:Seraphimblade did that. The template itself is not something to worry about, as it is designed to attract more experienced editors to help you make the article better. If you have specific concerns about how the article should grow and develop, be sure to discuss them on the article's talk page. That way, interested editors can quickly see your plans and concerns, and do not need to search across several users' talk pages. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 02:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

If you're having trouble with Swedish sources, perhaps you should place a request for help at Wikipedia:Translation? While I'm not sure if they generally handle translating or helping with foreign-language sources, it certainly can't hurt to ask, and that project has people that speak about every language conceivable. (Unfortunately, I don't speak Swedish. If it were Spanish you needed I could help you out myself.) Seraphimblade 13:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am expecting text from Sweden directly. What I have requested are items from the Swedish press, or from Swedish artists/curators etc. that speak about Paletten. I have asked for links (if they are on the web) and for a short English translation (say a sentence or phrase) from the Swedish link that I can attribute to a particular source (person or magazine or catalog). If the material is not on the web I have asked for full attribution (speaker, date, source) so that the notation criterion is satisfied.

Once I think it is satisfied, I imagine I'm still supposed to leave the tag there until you also agree it is satisfied. Then you can remove it. Correct?

Stevenwikikaplan 17:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I have spokn with Paletten, and they would not mind (in fact would prefer) that their contact info -- address, phone, e-mail) be included. Is trhere an interdiction from Wikipedia, or may I add it, as I had originally?

Stevenwikikaplan 17:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References have been added. Feel free to remove any tags that in your judgement are no longer applicable.

Stevenwikikaplan 19:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Paletten constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages. If you wish to make useful contributions, read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 04:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Onorem 04:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 26

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
Seriously...what is it that you're trying to do with the Paletten article? --Onorem 12:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Stevenwikikaplan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

66.108.139.243 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Redlightgreenlight". The reason given for Redlightgreenlight's block is: "vandalism only account; warned".

Blocking administrator: Kuru (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: This account is fairly obviously a sockpuppet for Redlightgreenlight and has been blocked accordingly. -- Yamla 17:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To Kuru: I wish to restore the content defaced by Redlighgreenlight. If you remove the block I will restore the content of the Paletten entry prior to this vandalism. Stevenwikikaplan 14:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This whole thing about sockpuppet or meatpuppet is beyond me. Someone was able to use my IP address, but I understand this has probably been cured by the server. Meanwhile, the only content I have ever entered on Wikipedia was for Paletten, and I retain the text of the edit which was defaced by Redlightgreenlight. I would be happy to replace the text of this entry and this entry alone, and then be blocked again for all eternity, if you feel this is justified. My only concern is to be able to make the entry whole again. Stevenwikikaplan 20:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Logga.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Logga.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 03:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Omslag266.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Omslag266.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:02, 26 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 00:02, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Firstpalettencover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Firstpalettencover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:38, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]