Draft:Crossover (company)
Submission declined on 10 October 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 8 October 2024 by Curb Safe Charmer (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Curb Safe Charmer 13 days ago.
|
Submission declined on 2 October 2024 by Timtrent (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Timtrent 19 days ago.
|
Submission declined on 26 September 2024 by Star Mississippi (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Star Mississippi 25 days ago.
|
- Comment: I should clarify: the Forbes and NYT articles don't show notability on their own, but they are the only independent and secondary sources in the draft. bonadea contributions talk 14:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The NYT source is OK and I think the Forbes ones are as well, but the information in those sources was not used at all in the draft. Perhaps because they level scathing criticism against Crossover. I added a very little bit in the sentence supported by the NYT source, but if this is to become an article all the promotional hype and jargon has to go, and the focus should be on what can actually be sourced in independent, secondary, reliable sources. bonadea contributions talk 14:17, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Lack of useful references (LinkedIn is useless as a references) plus tone make this look almost like a corporate brochure 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Needs more sources independent of Crossover itself. Please read WP:SIRS for details on the kind of sourcing Star Mississippi 17:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Crossover (Recruitment Company)
[edit]Company type | Private |
---|---|
Industry | HR, Recruitment & Stuffing, Business Services, Remote Work |
Founded | 2014 |
Founder | Andy Tryba |
Headquarters | Austin, Texas , United States |
Area served | Worldwide |
Owner | ESW Capital Group |
Website | crossover |
Crossover is a private, global recruitment company specializing in full-time remote job placements. The company focuses on hiring highly skilled tech professionals and other roles across various industries.
History
[edit]Crossover was founded by Andy Tryba[1] in 2014 in response to the growth of cloud computing and connectivity, which made remote work more feasible. The company has since recruited contractors for various technical and non-technical roles, emphasizing a remote-first recruitment strategy.
Company is known for hiring software developers, but also recruits customer support, finance, sales, marketing, education, and executive leadership positions.
In 2021, the company registered the ‘Crossover’ trademark in the United States, covering its recruitment services.[2]
Since 2023, the company has adopted a strict AI-first approach.
According to Zippia, Crossover’s revenue was $12.1M in 2023.[3]
Operations
[edit]Crossover operates a recruitment model that focuses on skills assessments over traditional CVs and cover letters, utilizing AI-powered tests to evaluate candidates’ capabilities.
The company promotes a remote-first employment model, aiming to facilitate global hiring by connecting tech professionals with employers worldwide.[4]
Crossover's operations are supported by ESW Capital and it powers the global workforce for their 150+ tech companies, including several Fortune 500 brands.[5] Their largest client is Trilogy.
Crossover has a proprietary tool, WorkSmart, which monitors and tracks employee activities on their computers. The tool has been criticised as intrusive and a source of anxiety for workers, and the tracking software not counting time spent working away from the computer have resulted in employees not being paid for their working time.[6][7]
Community Reach
[edit]The "Out of Office" series is produced by Crossover on YouTube.
Crossover publishes a newsletter on LinkedIn, with 2.4 million subscribers, ranking it among the top 50 on the platform.[8]
External Links
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "How A Mysterious Tech Billionaire Created Two Fortunes—And A Global Software Sweatshop". Forbes.
- ^ "Trademark Status & Document Retrieval". The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
- ^ "Crossover Revenue: Annual, Quarterly, and Historic". Zippia.
- ^ "Remote Work Insights: Empowering Global Talent". Veriff.com.
- ^ "ESW Capital Operating Manual". Colin Keeley.
- ^ "Workplace Productivity: Are You Being Tracked?". The New York Times.
- ^ "The Billionaire Who Pioneered Remote Work Has A New Plan To Turn His Workers Into Algorithms". Forbes.
- ^ "Top 50 - LinkedIn Newsletter Charts". Reletter.