Review waiting, please be patient.

This may take 7 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,232 pending submissions waiting for review.

If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Reviewer tools

Instructions · What links here · Crossover (company) (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 23 days ago by StefanCosic (talk: D · +) · Last edited 21 days ago by Citation bot

Submission declined on 10 October 2024 by Bonadea (talk).

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Bonadea 42 days ago. Last edited by Citation bot 21 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 8 October 2024 by Curb Safe Charmer (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Curb Safe Charmer 43 days ago.

Submission declined on 2 October 2024 by Timtrent (talk).

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Timtrent 50 days ago.

Submission declined on 26 September 2024 by Star Mississippi (talk).

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Star Mississippi 56 days ago.

Comment: I should clarify: the Forbes and NYT articles don't show notability on their own, but they are the only independent and secondary sources in the draft. bonadea contributions talk 14:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Comment: The NYT source is OK and I think the Forbes ones are as well, but the information in those sources was not used at all in the draft. Perhaps because they level scathing criticism against Crossover. I added a very little bit in the sentence supported by the NYT source, but if this is to become an article all the promotional hype and jargon has to go, and the focus should be on what can actually be sourced in independent, secondary, reliable sources. bonadea contributions talk 14:17, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Comment: Lack of useful references (LinkedIn is useless as a references) plus tone make this look almost like a corporate brochure 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Comment: Needs more sources independent of Crossover itself. Please read WP:SIRS for details on the kind of sourcing Star Mississippi 17:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Crossover (Recruitment Company)

Crossover
Company type	Private
Industry	HR, Recruitment & Stuffing, Business Services, Remote Work
Founded	2014
Founder	Andy Tryba
Headquarters	Austin, Texas, United States
Area served	Worldwide
Owner	ESW Capital Group
Website	crossover.com

Crossover is a private, global recruitment company specializing in full-time remote job placements. The company focuses on hiring highly skilled tech professionals and other roles across various industries worldwide.

History

Crossover was founded in 2014 by Andy Tryba, following his work at Intel and his advisory role to President Obama’s Council^[1]. He launched the company in response to the growth of cloud computing, which made remote work more feasible^[2]. The company has since recruited contractors for various technical and non-technical roles, using a remote-first recruitment strategy.

Crossover is known for hiring software developers, but also recruits AI-engineers^[3], customer support, finance, sales, marketing, education, and executive leadership positions.

In 2021, the company registered the ‘Crossover’ trademark in the United States, covering its recruitment services.^[4]

According to Zippia, Crossover’s revenue was $12.1M in 2023.^[5]

Operations

Crossover operates a recruitment model that focuses on skills assessments over traditional CVs and cover letters, utilizing AI-powered tests to evaluate candidates’ capabilities.

Crossover's operations are supported by ESW Capital, founded by Joe Liemandt^[6], and power the global workforce for their tech companies.^[7]^[8] Their largest client is Trilogy.

Crossover has a proprietary tool, WorkSmart, which monitors and tracks employee activities on their computers. The tool has been criticized as intrusive and a source of anxiety for workers, and the tracking software not counting time spent working away from the computer.^[9]

Community Reach

The "Out of Office" series is produced by Crossover on YouTube.

Crossover publishes a newsletter on LinkedIn, with 2.4 million subscribers, ranking it among the top 50 on the platform.^[10]

External Links

Official Website

References

^ "How A Mysterious Tech Billionaire Created Two Fortunes—And A Global Software Sweatshop". Forbes.
^ "Obama's adviser on the future of work: "Don't even think about it – technical education first, and then you'll decide"". MIND.
^ "How to Find AI Jobs That Pay More Than $300K at Non-Tech Firms". Business Insider.
^ "Trademark Status & Document Retrieval". The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
^ "Crossover Revenue: Annual, Quarterly, and Historic". Zippia. 14 December 2021.
^ "Forbes profile: Joseph Liemandt". Forbes.
^ "The Billionaire Who Pioneered Remote Work Has A New Plan To Turn His Workers Into Algorithms". Forbes.
^ "Small Software Companies Find a Home With ESW Capital". The Wall Street Journal Pro Bankruptcy.
^ Kantor, Jodi; Sundaram, Arya; Aufrichtig, Aliza; Taylor, Rumsey (15 August 2022). "Workplace Productivity: Are You Being Tracked?". The New York Times.
^ "Top 50 - LinkedIn Newsletter Charts". Reletter.

[1] "How A Mysterious Tech Billionaire Created Two Fortunes—And A Global Software Sweatshop". Forbes.

[2] "Obama's adviser on the future of work: "Don't even think about it – technical education first, and then you'll decide"". MIND.

[3] "How to Find AI Jobs That Pay More Than $300K at Non-Tech Firms". Business Insider.

[4] "Trademark Status & Document Retrieval". The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

[5] "Crossover Revenue: Annual, Quarterly, and Historic". Zippia. 14 December 2021.

[6] "Forbes profile: Joseph Liemandt". Forbes.

[7] "The Billionaire Who Pioneered Remote Work Has A New Plan To Turn His Workers Into Algorithms". Forbes.

[8] "Small Software Companies Find a Home With ESW Capital". The Wall Street Journal Pro Bankruptcy.

[9] Kantor, Jodi; Sundaram, Arya; Aufrichtig, Aliza; Taylor, Rumsey (15 August 2022). "Workplace Productivity: Are You Being Tracked?". The New York Times.

[10] "Top 50 - LinkedIn Newsletter Charts". Reletter.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]