Jump to content

User:Ss13zf/adolescencepagewikiprojectSANDBOX

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here is the Sandbox for our project! This is a copy of the article that the group is editing. Changes are in bold for ease.

Social development

[edit]

Identity development

[edit]

Identity development is a stage in the adolescent life cycle[1]. The search for identity begins in the adolescent years. During these years, adolescents are more open to 'trying on' different behaviours and appearances to discover who they are [2]. But, developing and maintaining identity (in adolescent years) is a difficult task due to multiple factors such as family life, environment, and social status [3]. Empirical studies suggest that this process might be more accurately described as identity development, rather than formation, but confirms a normative process of change in both content and structure of one's thoughts about the self.[4] The two main aspects of identity development are self-clarity and self-esteem [5]. Since choices made during adolescent years can influence later life, high levels of self-awareness and self-control during mid-adolescence will lead to better decisions during the transition to adulthood.[citation needed] Researchers have used three general approaches to understanding identity development: self-concept, sense of identity, and self-esteem. The years of adolescence create a more conscientious group of young adults. Adolescents pay close attention and give more time and effort to their appearance as their body goes through changes. Unlike children, teens put forth an effort to look presentable (1991).[6] The environment in which an adolescent grows up also plays an important role in their identity development. Studies done by the American Psychological Association have shown that adolescents with a less privileged upbringing have a more difficult time developing their identity.[7]

Self-concept

[edit]
See also: Self-concept

The idea of self-concept is known as the the ability of a person to have opinions and beliefs that are defined confidently, consistent, and stable [8].Early in adolescence, cognitive developments result in greater self-awareness, greater awareness of others and their thoughts and judgments, the ability to think about abstract, future possibilities, and the ability to consider multiple possibilities at once. As a result, adolescents experience a significant shift from the simple, concrete, and global self-descriptions typical of young children; as children, they defined themselves with physical traits whereas as adolescents, they define themselves based on their values, thoughts and opinions.[9]

Adolescents can conceptualize multiple "possible selves" that they could become[10] and long-term possibilities and consequences of their choices.[11] Exploring these possibilities may result in abrupt changes in self-presentation as the adolescent chooses or rejects qualities and behaviors, trying to guide the actual self toward the ideal self (who the adolescent wishes to be) and away from the feared self (who the adolescent does not want to be). For many, these distinctions are uncomfortable, but they also appear to motivate achievement through behavior consistent with the ideal and distinct from the feared possible selves.[10][12]

Further distinctions in self-concept, called "differentiation," occur as the adolescent recognizes the contextual influences on their own behavior and the perceptions of others, and begin to qualify their traits when asked to describe themselves.[13] Differentiation appears fully developed by mid-adolescence.[14] Peaking in the 7th-9th grades, the personality traits adolescents use to describe themselves refer to specific contexts, and therefore may contradict one another. The recognition of inconsistent content in the self-concept is a common source of distress in these years (see Cognitive dissonance),[15] but this distress may benefit adolescents by encouraging structural development.

Sense of identity

[edit]

Egocentrism in adolescents forms a self-conscious desire to feel important in their peer groups and enjoy social acceptance.Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page). Adolescents begin by defining themselves based on their crowd membership. "Clothes help teens explore new identities, separate from parents, and bond with peers." Fashion has played a major role when it comes to teenagers "finding their selves"; Fashion is always evolving, which corresponds with the evolution of change in the personality of teenagers.[16] Adolescents attempt to define their identity by consciously styling themselves in different manners to find what best suits them. Trial and error in matching both their perceived image and the image others respond to and see, allows for the adolescent to grasp an understanding of who they are[17] Just as fashion is evolving to influence adolescents so is the media. "Modern life takes place amidst a never-ending barrage of flesh on screens, pages, and billboards."[18] This barrage consciously or subconsciously registers into the mind causing issues with self-image a factor that contributes to an adolescence sense of identity. Researcher James Marcia developed the current method for testing an individual's progress along these stages.[19][20] His questions are divided into three categories: occupation, ideology, and interpersonal relationships. Answers are scored based on extent to which the individual has explored and the degree to which he has made commitments. The result is classification of the individual into a) identity diffusion in which all children begin, b) Identity Foreclosure in which commitments are made without the exploration of alternatives, c) Moratorium, or the process of exploration, or d) Identity Achievement in which Moratorium has occurred and resulted in commitments.[21]

Research since reveals self-examination beginning early in adolescence, but identity achievement rarely occurring before age 18.[22] The freshman year of college influences identity development significantly, but may actually prolong psychosocial moratorium by encouraging reexamination of previous commitments and further exploration of alternate possibilities without encouraging resolution.[23] For the most part, evidence has supported Erikson's stages: each correlates with the personality traits he originally predicted.[21] Studies also confirm the impermanence of the stages; there is no final endpoint in identity development.[24]

Environment and identity

[edit]

An adolescent's environment plays a huge role in their identity development.[7] While most adolescent studies are conducted on white, middle class children, studies show that the more privileged upbringing people have, the more successfully they develop their identity.[7] The forming of an adolescent's identity is a crucial time in their life. It has been recently found that demographic patterns suggest that the transition to adulthood is now occurring over a longer span of years than was the case during the middle of the 20th century. Accordingly, youth, a period that spans late adolescence and early adulthood, has become a more prominent stage of the life course. This therefore has caused various factors to become important during this development.[25] So many factors contribute to the developing social identity of an adolescent from commitment, to coping devices,[26] to social media. All of these factors are affected by the environment an adolescent grows up in. A child from a more privileged upbringing is exposed to more opportunities and better situations in general. An adolescent from an inner city or a crime-driven neighborhood is more likely to be exposed to an environment that can be detrimental to their development. Adolescence is a sensitive period in the development process, and exposure to the wrong things at that time can have a major affect on future decisions. While children that grow up in nice suburban communities are not exposed to bad environments they are more likely to participate in activities that can benefit their identity and contribute to a more successful identity development.[7]

Sexual orientation and identity

[edit]

Sexual orientation has been defined as "an erotic inclination toward people of one or more genders, most often described as sexual or erotic attractions".[27] In recent years, psychologists have sought to understand how sexual orientation develops during adolescence. Some theorists believe that there are many different possible developmental paths one could take, and that the specific path an individual follows may be determined by their sex, orientation, and when they reached the onset of puberty.[27]

In 1989, Troiden proposed a four-stage model for the development of homosexual sexual identity.[28] The first stage, known as sensitization, usually starts in childhood, and is marked by the child's becoming aware of same-sex attractions. The second stage, identity confusion, tends to occur a few years later. In this stage, the youth is overwhelmed by feelings of inner turmoil regarding their sexual orientation, and begins to engage sexual experiences with same-sex partners. In the third stage of identity assumption, which usually takes place a few years after the adolescent has left home, adolescents begin to come out to their family and close friends, and assumes a self-definition as gay, lesbian, or bisexual.[29] In the final stage, known as commitment, the young adult adopts their sexual identity as a lifestyle. Therefore, this model estimates that the process of coming out begins in childhood, and continues through the early to mid 20s. This model has been contested, and alternate ideas have been explored in recent years.

In terms of sexual identity, adolescence is when most gay/lesbian and transgender adolescents begin to recognize and make sense of their feelings. Many adolescents may choose to come out during this period of their life once an identity has been formed; many others may go through a period of questioning or denial, which can include experimentation with both homosexual and heterosexual experiences.[30] A study of 194 lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths under the age of 21 found that having an awareness of one's sexual orientation occurred, on average, around age 10, but the process of coming out to peers and adults occurred around age 16 and 17, respectively.[31] Coming to terms with and creating a positive LGBT identity can be difficult for some youth for a variety of reasons. Peer pressure is a large factor when youth who are questioning their sexuality or gender identity are surrounded by heteronormative peers and can cause great distress due to a feeling of being different from everyone else. While coming out can also foster better psychological adjustment, the risks associated are real. Indeed, coming out in the midst of a heteronormative peer environment often comes with the risk of ostracism, hurtful jokes, and even violence.[30] Because of this, statistically the suicide rate amongst LGBT adolescents is up to four times higher than that of their heterosexual peers due to bullying and rejection from peers or family members.[32]

Self-esteem

[edit]

The final major aspect of identity formation is self-esteem. Most theories on self-esteem state that there is a grand desire, across all genders and ages, to maintain, protect and enhance their self-esteem[33]. Self-esteem is defined as one's thoughts and feelings about one's self-concept and identity[34]. Contrary to popular belief, there is no empirical evidence for a significant drop in self-esteem over the course of adolescence.[35] "Barometric self-esteem" fluctuates rapidly and can cause severe distress and anxiety, but baseline self-esteem remains highly stable across adolescence.[36] The validity of global self-esteem scales has been questioned, and many suggest that more specific scales might reveal more about the adolescent experience.[37] Girls are most likely to enjoy high self-esteem when engaged in supportive relationships with friends, the most important function of friendship to them is having someone who can provide social and moral support. When they fail to win friends' approval or couldn't find someone with whom to share common activities and common interests, in these cases, girls suffer from low self-esteem. In contrast, boys are more concerned with establishing and asserting their independence and defining their relation to authority.[38]As such, they are more likely to derive high self-esteem from their ability to successfully influence their friends; on the other hand, the lack of romantic competence, for example, failure to win or maintain the affection of the opposite or same-sex (depending on sexual orientation), is the major contributor to low self-esteem in adolescent boys. Due to the fact that both men and women happen to have a low self-esteem after ending a romantic relationship, they are prone to other symptoms that is caused by this state. Depression and hopelessness are only two of the various symptoms and it is said that women are twice as likely to experience depression and men are three to four times more likely to commit suicide (Mearns, 1991; Ustun & Sartorius, 1995).[39]

Relationships

[edit]

In general

[edit]

The relationships adolescents have with their peers, family, and members of their social sphere play a vital role in the social development of an adolescent. As an adolescent's social sphere develops rapidly as they distinguish the differences between friends and acquaintances, they often become heavily emotionally invested in friends.[40] This is not harmful; however, if these friends expose an individual to potentially harmful situations, this is an aspect of peer pressure. Adolescence is a critical period in social development because adolescents can be easily influenced by the people they develop close relationships with. This is the first time individuals can truly make their own decisions, which also makes this a sensitive period. Relationships are vital in the social development of an adolescent due to the extreme influence peers can have over an individual. These relationships become significant because they begin to help the adolescent understand the concept of personalities, how they form and why a person has that specific type of personality. "The use of psychological comparisons could serve both as an index of the growth of an implicit personality theory and as a component process accounting for its creation. In other words, by comparing one person's personality characteristics to another's, we would be setting up the framework for creating a general theory of personality (and, ... such a theory would serve as a useful framework for coming to understand specific persons)."[41] This can be likened to the use of social comparison in developing one’s identity and self concept, which includes ones personality, and underscores the importance of communication, and thus relationships, in one’s development. In social comparison we use reference groups, with respect to both psychological and identity development [42]. These reference groups are the peers of adolescents. This means that who the teen chooses/accepts as their friends and who they communicate with on a frequent basis often makes up their reference groups and can therefore have a huge impact on who they become. Research shows that relationships have the largest affect over the social development of an individual.

Family

[edit]
See also: Depression in childhood and adolescence and Sibling relationship
Teenage sisters

Adolescence marks a rapid change in one's role within a family. Young children tend to assert themselves forcefully, but are unable to demonstrate much influence over family decisions until early adolescence,[43] when they are increasingly viewed by parents as equals. The adolescent faces the task of increasing independence while preserving a caring relationship with his or her parents.[17] When children go through puberty, there is often a significant increase in parent-child conflict and a less cohesive familial bond. Arguments often concern minor issues of control, such as curfew, acceptable clothing, and the adolescent's right to privacy,[44][45] which adolescents may have previously viewed as issues over which their parents had complete authority.[46] Parent-adolescent disagreement also increases as friends demonstrate a greater impact on one another, new influences on the adolescent that may be in opposition to parents' values. Social media has also played an increasing role in adolescent and parent disagreements.[47] While parents never had to worry about the threats of social media in the past, it has become a dangerous place for children. While adolescents strive for their freedoms, the unknowns to parents of what their child is doing on social media sites is a challenging subject, due to the increasing amount of predators on social media sites. Many parents have very little knowledge of social networking sites in the first place and this further increases their mistrust. An important challenge for the parent-adolescent relationship is to understand how to enhance the opportunities of online communication while managing its risks[48]. Although conflicts between children and parents increase during adolescence, these are just relatively minor issues. Regarding their important life issues, most adolescents still share the same attitudes and values as their parents.[49]

During childhood, siblings are a source of conflict and frustration as well as a support system.[50] Adolescence may affect this relationship differently, depending on sibling gender. In same-sex sibling pairs, intimacy increases during early adolescence, then remains stable. Mixed-sex siblings pairs act differently; siblings drift apart during early adolescent years, but experience an increase in intimacy starting at middle adolescence.[51] Sibling interactions are children's first relational experiences, the ones that shape their social and self-understanding for life.[52] Sustaining positive sibling relations can assist adolescents in a number of ways. Siblings are able to act as peers, and may increase one another's sociability and feelings of self-worth. Older siblings can give guidance to younger siblings, although the impact of this can be either positive or negative depending on the activity of the older sibling.

A potential important influence on adolescence is change of the family dynamic, specifically divorce. With the divorce rate up to about 50%,[53] divorce is common and adds to the already great amount of change in adolescence. Custody disputes soon after a divorce often reflect a playing out of control battles and ambivalence between parents. Divorce usually results in less contact between the adolescent and their noncustodial parent.[54] In extreme cases of instability and abuse in homes, divorce can have a positive effect on families due to less conflict in the home. However, most research suggests a negative effect on adolescence as well as later development. A recent study found that, compared with peers who grow up in stable post-divorce families, children of divorce who experience additional family transitions during late adolescence, make less progress in their math and social studies performance over time.[55] Another recent study put forth a new theory entitled the adolescent epistemological trauma theory,[56] which posited that traumatic life events such as parental divorce during the formative period of late adolescence portend lifelong effects on adult conflict behavior that can be mitigated by effective behavioral assessment and training.[57] A parental divorce during childhood or adolescence continues to have a negative effect when a person is in his or her twenties and early thirties. These negative effects include romantic relationships and conflict style, meaning as adults, they are more likely to use the styles of avoidance and competing in conflict management.[58]

Despite changing family roles during adolescence, the home environment and parents are still important for the behaviors and choices of adolescents.[59] Adolescents who have a good relationship with their parents are less likely to engage in various risk behaviors, such as smoking, drinking, fighting, and/or unprotected sexual intercourse.[59] In addition, parents influence the education of adolescence. A study conducted by Adalbjarnardottir and Blondal (2009) showed that adolescents at the age of 14 who identify their parents as authoritative figures are more likely to complete secondary education by the age of 22—as support and encouragement from an authoritative parent motivates the adolescence to complete schooling to avoid disappointing that parent.[60]

Peers

[edit]

Peer groups are essential to social and general development. Communication with peers increases significantly during adolescence and peer relationships become more intense than in other stages [61] and more influential to the teen, affecting both the decisions and choices being made.[62] High quality friendships may enhance children's development regardless of the characteristics of those friends. As children begin to gain bonds with various people and create friendships with them, it later helps them when they are adolescent. This sets up the framework for adolescence and peer groups.[63] Peer groups are especially important during adolescence, a period of development characterized by a dramatic increase in time spent with peers[64] and a decrease in adult supervision.[65] Adolescents also associate with friends of the opposite sex much more than in childhood[66] and tend to identify with larger groups of peers based on shared characteristics.[67] It is also common for adolescents to use friends as coping devices in different situations.[68] A three factor structure of dealing with friends including avoidance, mastery, and nonchalance has shown that adolescent's use friends as coping devices with social stresses.

Communication within peer groups allows adolescents to explore their feelings, their identity and develop and evaluate their social skills. Peer groups offer members the opportunity to develop social skills such as empathy, sharing, and leadership. Adolescents choose peer groups based on characteristics similarly found in themselves.[17] By utilizing these relationships, adolescents become more accepting of who they are becoming. Group norms and values are incorporated into an adolescent’s own self-concept.[62] Through developing new communication skills and reflecting upon those of their peers, as well as self-opinions and values, an adolescent can share and express emotions and other concerns without fear of rejection or judgment. Peer groups can have positive influences on an individual, such as on academic motivation and performance. But they can also have negative influences, like encouraging experimentation with drugs, drinking, vandalism, and stealing through peer pressure.[69] Susceptibility to peer pressure increases during early adolescence, peaks around age 14, and declines thereafter.[70]

During early adolescence, adolescents often associate in cliques, exclusive, single-sex groups of peers with whom they are particularly close. Despite the common notion that cliques are an inherently negative influence, they may help adolescents become socially acclimated and form a stronger sense of identity. Within a clique of highly athletic male-peers, for example, the clique may create a stronger sense of fidelity and competition. Cliques also have become somewhat as a "collective parent," i.e. telling the adolescents what to do and not to do.[71] Towards late adolescence, cliques often merge into mixed-sex groups as teenagers begin romantically engaging with one another.[72] These small friend groups break down even further as socialization becomes more couple-oriented.

While peers may facilitate social development for one another, they may also hinder it. In Spanish teenagers, emotional (rather than solution-based) reaction to problems and emotional instability have been linked with physical aggression against peers.[73] Both physical and relational aggression are linked to a vast number of enduring psychological difficulties, especially depression, as is social rejection.[74] Because of this, bullied adolescents often develop problems that lead to further victimization.[75] Bullied adolescents are both more likely to continued to be bullied and more likely to bully others in the future.[76] However, this relationship is less stable in cases of cyberbullying, a relatively new issue among adolescents.

adolescents using newer communication channels

On a larger scale, adolescents often associate with crowds, groups of individuals who share a common interest or activity. Often, crowd identities may be the basis for stereotyping young people, such as jocks or nerds. In large, multi-ethnic high schools, there are often ethnically-determined crowds as well.[77] While crowds are very influential during early and middle adolescence, they lose salience during high school as students identify more individually.[78]

When discussing peer relationships among adolescents it is also important to include information in regards to how they communicate with one another. An important aspect of communication is the channel used. Channel, in this respect, refers to the form of communication, be it face-to-face, email, text message, phone or other. Teens are heavy users of newer forms of communication such as text message and social-networking websites such as Facebook, especially when communicating with peers [79]. Adolescents use online technology to experiment with emerging identities and to broaden their peer groups, such as increasing the amount of friends acquired on Facebook and other social media sites.[62] Some adolescents use these newer channels to enhance relationships with peers however there can be negative uses as well such as cyberbullying, as mentioned previously, and negative impacts on the family [79].

Romance and sexual activity

[edit]
Main article: Adolescent sexuality
See also: Adolescent sexuality in the United States

Romantic relationships tend to increase in prevalence throughout adolescence. By age 15, 53% of adolescents have had a romantic relationship that lasted at least one month over the course of the previous 18 months.[80] In a 2008 study conducted by YouGov for Channel 4, 20% of 14−17-year-olds surveyed revealed that they had their first sexual experience at 13 or under in the United Kingdom.[81] A 2002 American study found that those aged 15–44 reported that the average age of first sexual intercourse was 17.0 for males and 17.3 for females.[82] The typical duration of relationships increases throughout the teenage years as well. This constant increase in the likelihood of a long-term relationship can be explained by sexual maturation and the development of cognitive skills necessary to maintain a romantic bond (e.g. caregiving, appropriate attachment), although these skills are not strongly developed until late adolescence.[83] Long-term relationships allow adolescents to gain the skills necessary for high-quality relationships later in life[84] and develop feelings of self-worth. Overall, positive romantic relationships among adolescents can result in long-term benefits. High-quality romantic relationships are associated with higher commitment in early adulthood[85] and are positively associated with self-esteem, self-confidence, and social competence.[86][87] For example, an adolescent with positive self-confidence is likely to consider themselves a more successful partner, whereas negative experiences may lead to low confidence as a romantic partner.[88] Adolescents often date within their demographic in regards to race, ethnicity, popularity, and physical attractiveness.[89] However, there are traits in which certain individuals, particularly adolescent girls, seek diversity. While most adolescents date people approximately their own age, boys typically date partners the same age or younger; girls typically date partners the same age or older.[80]

Some researchers are now focusing on learning about how adolescents view their own relationships and sexuality; they want to move away from a research point of view that focuses on the problems associated with adolescent sexuality.[why?] College Professor Lucia O'Sullivan and her colleagues found that there weren't any significant gender differences in the relationship events adolescent boys and girls from grades 7-12 reported.[90] Most teens said they had kissed their partners, held hands with them, thought of themselves as being a couple and told people they were in a relationship. This means that private thoughts about the relationship as well as public recognition of the relationship were both important to the adolescents in the sample. Sexual events (such as sexual touching, sexual intercourse) were less common than romantic events (holding hands) and social events (being with one's partner in a group setting). The researchers state that these results are important because the results focus on the more positive aspects of adolescents and their social and romantic interactions rather than focusing on sexual behavior and its consequences.[90]

Adolescence marks a time of sexual maturation, which manifests in social interactions as well. While adolescents may engage in casual sexual encounters (often referred to as hookups), most sexual experience during this period of development takes place within romantic relationships.[91] Adolescents can use technologies and social media to seek out romantic relationships as they feel it is a safe place to try out dating and identity exploration. From these social media encounters, a further relationship may begin.[62] Kissing, hand holding, and hugging signify satisfaction and commitment. Among young adolescents, "heavy" sexual activity, marked by genital stimulation, is often associated with violence, depression, and poor relationship quality.[92][93] This effect does not hold true for sexual activity in late adolescence that takes place within a romantic relationship.[94] Some research suggest that there are genetic causes of early sexual activity that are also risk factors for delinquency, suggesting that there is a group who are at risk for both early sexual activity and emotional distress. For old adolescents, though, sexual activity in the context of romantic relationships was actually correlated with lower levels of deviant behavior after controlling for genetic risks, as opposed to sex outside of a relationship (hook-ups)[95]

Dating violence is fairly prevalent within adolescent relationships. When surveyed, 10-45% of adolescents reported having experienced physical violence in the context of a relationship while a quarter to a third of adolescents reported having experiencing psychological aggression. This reported aggression includes hitting, throwing things, or slaps, although most of this physical aggression does not result in a medical visit. Physical aggression in relationships tends to decline from high school through college and young adulthood. In heterosexual couples, there is no significant difference between the rates of male and female aggressors, unlike in adult relationships.[96][97][98]

In contemporary society, adolescents also face some risks as their sexuality begins to transform. While some of these, such as emotional distress (fear of abuse or exploitation) and sexually transmitted infections/diseases (STIs/STDs), including HIV/AIDS, are not necessarily inherent to adolescence, others such as teenage pregnancy (through non-use or failure of contraceptives) are seen as social problems in most western societies. One in four sexually active teenagers will contract an STI.[99] Adolescents in the United States often chose "anything but intercourse" for sexual activity because they mistakenly believe it reduces the risk of STIs. Across the country, clinicians report rising diagnoses of herpes and human papillomavirus (HPV), which can cause genital warts, and is now thought to affect 15 percent of the teen population. Girls 15 to 19 have higher rates of gonorrhea than any other age group. One-quarter of all new HIV cases occur in those under the age of 21.[99] Multrine also states in her article that according to a March survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation, eighty-one percent of parents want schools to discuss the use of condoms and contraception with their children. They also believe students should be able to be tested for STIs. Furthermore, teachers want to address such topics with their students. But, although 9 in 10 sex education instructors across the country believe that students should be taught about contraceptives in school, over one quarter report receiving explicit instructions from school boards and administrators not to do so. According to anthropologist Margaret Mead, the turmoil found in adolescence in Western society has a cultural rather than a physical cause; they reported that societies where young women engaged in free sexual activity had no such adolescent turmoil.

  1. ^ Kroger, J. (1996) The Balance Between Self and Other. (pp. 40-46). New York, U.S.A. Routledge
  2. ^ Strasburger, V.C., Wilson B.J., Jordan, A.B. (2014) Children and Adolescents: Unique Audiences. Children, Adolescents, and the Media. (pp. 11-19). U.S.A: SAGE Publications
  3. ^ Kroger, J. (1996) The Balance Between Self and Other. (pp. 40-46). New York, U.S.A. Routledge
  4. ^ Steinberg, L. (2008). Adolescence, 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  5. ^ Strasburger, V.C., Wilson B.J., Jordan, A.B. (2014) Children and Adolescents: Unique Audiences. Children, Adolescents, and the Media. (pp. 11-19). U.S.A: SAGE Publications
  6. ^ Cite error: The named reference psychtoday was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  7. ^ a b c d American Psychological Association (APA). United States Department of Health and Human Services.
  8. ^ Journal of Adolescent Health. Volume 48, 2nd ed. February 2011. (pp. 121-127) “Online Communication Among Adolescents: An Integrated Model of Its Attraction, Opportunities, and Risks.” Retrieved from: [[1]].
  9. ^ Carlson, Neil R. (2010). Psychology: the science of behaviour. Toronto, Ontario: Pearson Education Canada.
  10. ^ a b Markus H., Nurius P. (1986). "Possible selves". American Psychologist. 41 (9): 954–969. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954.
  11. ^ Nurmi, J. (2004). Socialization and self-development: Channeling, selection, adjustment, and reflection. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley.
  12. ^ Oyserman D., Markus H. (1990). "Possible selves and deliquency". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59 (1): 112–125. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.112. PMID 2213484.
  13. ^ Harter, S. (1999). The construction of the self. New York: Guilford Press.
  14. ^ Marsh H (1989). "Age and sex differences in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to earl adulthood". Journal of Educational Psychology. 81: 417–430. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.417.
  15. ^ Harter S., Monsour A. (1992). "Developmental analysis of conflict caused by opposing attributes in the adolescent self-portrait". Developmental Psychology. 28 (2): 251–260. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.2.251.
  16. ^ "You're Wearing That?" by Stacey Schultz. US News & World Report Special Issue
  17. ^ a b c Rawlins, W.K. (1992), Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and life course, New York: Aldine de Gruyter
  18. ^ "The Media Assault on Male Body Image" by Brandon Klein. Seed Magazine.
  19. ^ Marcia J (1966). "Development and validation of ego identity status". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 3 (5): 551–558. doi:10.1037/h0023281. PMID 5939604.
  20. ^ Marcia J (1976). "Identity six years after: A follow-up study". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 3 (5): 551–558. doi:10.1037/h0023281. PMID 5939604.
  21. ^ a b Steinberg, L. (2008). Adolescence, 8th ed. 286. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  22. ^ Marcia, J. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology, pp. 159–187. New York: Wiley.
  23. ^ Montemayor, R., Brown, B., & Adams, G. (1985). Changes in identity status and psychological adjustment after leaving home and entering college. Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Toronto.
  24. ^ Steinberg, L. (2008). Adolescence, 8th ed. 288. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  25. ^ Furstenberg, Frank F. (November 2000). "The Sociology of Adolescence and Youth in the 1990s: A Critical Commentary". Journal of Marriage and Family. 62 (4): 896–910. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00896.x.
  26. ^ How do Young Adolescents Cope With Social Problems? An Examination of Social Goals, Coping With Friends, and Social Adjustment. Journal Of Early Adolescence.
  27. ^ a b Saewyc, E.M. (2011). "Research on Adolescent Sexual Orientation: Development, Health Disparities, Stigma, and Resilience". Journal of Research on Adolescence. 21 (1): 256–272. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00727.x. PMC 4835230. PMID 27099454.
  28. ^ Troiden, R. R. (1989). "The formation of homosexual identities". Journal of Homosexuality. 17 (1–2): 43–73. doi:10.1300/J082v17n01_02. PMID 2668403.
  29. ^ Floyd, Frank J.; Stein, Terry S. (2002). "Sexual orientation identity formation among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: Multiple patterns of milestone experiences". Journal of Research on Adolescence. 12 (2): 167–191. doi:10.1111/1532-7795.00030.
  30. ^ a b Morrow, Deana (Jan–March 2004). "Social work practice with gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender adolescents". Families in Society. 85 (1): 91–99. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.246. S2CID 144872473. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  31. ^ D'Augelli, Anthony; Scott Hershberger (1993). "Lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth in community settings: Personal challenges and mental health problems". American Journal of Community Psychology. 21 (4): 421–448. doi:10.1007/BF00942151. PMID 8192119. S2CID 39475366.
  32. ^ "Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender and Questioning Teen Suicide Statistics - Gay Teen Suicide Statistics". Gaylife.about.com. 2012-04-09. Retrieved 2012-09-15.
  33. ^ Journal of Adolescent Health. Volume 48, 2nd ed. February 2011. (pp. 121-127) “Online Communication Among Adolescents: An Integrated Model of Its Attraction, Opportunities, and Risks.” Retrieved from: [[2]].
  34. ^ Marmot, M. (2003) Self-Esteem and Health: Autonomy, Self-Esteem, and Health are Linked Together”. British Medical Journal (327) pp. 574-575
  35. ^ Steinberg, L. (2008). Adolescence, 8th ed. 270. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  36. ^ Rosenberg, M. (1986). Self concept from middle childhood through adolescence. In J. Suls & A. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self, Vol. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  37. ^ Steinberg, L. (2008). Adolescence, 8th ed. 273. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  38. ^ "Psychology: The Science of Behaviour" 3rd Canadian Edition
  39. ^ Osvelia Deeds, Jeannette Delgado, Miguel Diego, Tiffany Field, and Martha Pelaez (2009). "Adolescence".
  40. ^ "Adolescents and Peer Pressure". sitemaker.umich.edu/University of Michigan. Retrieved November 6, 2012.
  41. ^ Barenboim, Carl (1 March 1981). "The Development of Person Perception in Childhood and Adolescence: From Behavioral Comparisons to Psychological Constructs to Psychological Comparisons". Child Development (52): 129–144. doi:10.2307/1129222. JSTOR 1129222. Retrieved 8 November 2012.
  42. ^ Adler, R.B., Rosenfeld, L.B., Proctor, R.F., & Winder, C. (2012). "Interplay: The Process of Interpersonal Communication, Third Canadian Edition" Oxford University Press. pp. 42-45
  43. ^ Grotevant, H. (1997). Adolescent development in family contexts. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed.), Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development, pp. 1097–1149. New York: Wiley.
  44. ^ Steinberg L (2001). "We know some things: Adolescent-parent relationships in retrospect and prospect". Journal of Research on Adolescence. 11: 1–19. doi:10.1111/1532-7795.00001.
  45. ^ "Conflict - Couple Relationships, Family Relationships, Parent-child Relationships - Theory, Development, Children, and Parents - JRank Articles". Family.jrank.org. Retrieved 2012-09-15.
  46. ^ Smetana J. G. (1988). "Adolescents' and parents' conceptions of parental authority". Child Development. 59 (2): 321–335. doi:10.2307/1130313. JSTOR 1130313. PMID 3359858.
  47. ^ "Social Networking". theantidrug.com. Retrieved November 6, 2012.
  48. ^ Journal of Adolescent Health. Volume 48, 2nd ed. February 2011. (pp. 121-127) “Online Communication Among Adolescents: An Integrated Model of Its Attraction, Opportunities, and Risks.” Retrieved from: [[3]].
  49. ^ Neil R. Carlson C.Donald Heth, Psychology the Science of Behaviour, 4th Canadian Edition.
  50. ^ Lempers J, Clark-Lempers D (1992). "Young, middle, and late adolescents; comparisons of the functional importance of five significant relationships". Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 21 (1): 53–96. doi:10.1007/BF01536983. PMID 24263682. S2CID 40262274.
  51. ^ Kim J., McHale S. M., Osgood D. W., Grouter A. C. (2006). "Longitudinal course and family correlates of sibling relationships from childhood through adolescence". Child Development. 77 (6): 1746–1761. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00971.x. PMID 17107458.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  52. ^ Marano, Hara Estroff. "Oh, Brother!." Psychology Today Vol. 43, No. 4. Jul/Aug 2010: 54-61. SIRS Researcher. Web. 25 Oct 2010.
  53. ^ U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, updated and revised from "Families and Work in Transition in 12 Countries,1980–2001," Monthly Labor Review, September 2003
  54. ^ Vangelisti, A.L. (2004), Handbook of family communication, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  55. ^ Sun Y., Li Y. (2009). "Postdivorce family stability and changes in adolescents' academic performance: A growth-curve model". Journal of Family Issues. 30 (11): 1527–1555. doi:10.1177/0192513x09339022.
  56. ^ http://search.proquest.com/docview/1018397533/abstract?accountid=12933
  57. ^ Ziemer, B. S. (2012). Epistemological effects of divorce during adolescence on adult conflict behavior. Nova Southeastern University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, , 262.
  58. ^ Cherlin Andrew J., Chase-Lansdale P. Lindsay, McRaeAmerican Christine (1998). "Effects of Parental Divorce on Mental Health Throughout the Life Course". Sociological Review. 63 (2): 239–249. doi:10.2307/2657325. JSTOR 2657325.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  59. ^ Adalbjarnardottir S., Blondal K.S. (2009). "Parenting practices and school dropout: a longitudinal study". Adolescence. 44: 176. PMID 20432598.
  60. ^ Papalia, D.E., Olds, S.W., Feldman, R.D., & Kruk, R. (2004). A Child's World: Infancy through Adolescence (First Canadian Ed.) McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd. pp. 444-451
  61. ^ a b c d Swanson, D.P.; Edwards, M.C.; Spencer, M.B. (2010), Adolescence: Development during a global era, Boston: Elsevier Academic Press
  62. ^ Berndt, Thomas J. (February 2002). "Friendship Quality and Social Development". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 11 (1): 7–10. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00157. S2CID 14785379.
  63. ^ Larson R., Richards M. (1991). "Daily companionship in late childhood and early adolescence: Changing developmental contexts". Child Development. 62 (2): 284–300. doi:10.2307/1131003. JSTOR 1131003. PMID 2055123.
  64. ^ Brown, B. (1990). Peer groups. In S. Feldman & G. Elliot (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent, pp. 171–196. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  65. ^ Brown, B. (2004). Adolescents' relationships with peers. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley.
  66. ^ Eder D (1985). "The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescence". Sociology of Education. 58 (3): 154–165. doi:10.2307/2112416. JSTOR 2112416.
  67. ^ How do Young Adolescents Cope With Social Problems? An Examination of Social Goals, Coping With Friends, and Social Adjustment. Journal of Early Adolescence.
  68. ^ "Peer groups - children, therapy, adults, drug, people, skills, effect, women". Minddisorders.com. Retrieved 2012-09-15.
  69. ^ Steinberg, L; Monahan, KC (2007). "Age Differences in Resistance to Peer Influence". Developmental Psychology. 43 (6): 1531–43. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531. PMC 2779518. PMID 18020830.
  70. ^ Grier, Peter. "The Heart of a High School: Peers As Collective Parent." Christian Science Monitor. 24 Apr 2000: n.p. SIRS Researcher. Web. 25 Oct 2010.
  71. ^ Connolly J., Craig W., Goldberg A., Pepler D. (2004). "Mixed-gender groups, dating, and romantic relationships in early adolescence". Journal of Research on Adolescence. 14 (2): 185–207. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2004.01402003.x.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  72. ^ Carlo G., Mestre M. V., McGinley M. M., Samper P., Tur A., Sandman D. (2012). "The interplay of emotional instability, empathy, and coping on prosocial and aggressive behaviors". Personality and Individual Differences. 53 (5): 675–680. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.022. hdl:10550/77036.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  73. ^ French D., Conrad J. (2001). "School dropout as predicted by peer rejection and antisocial behavior". Journal of Research on Adolescence. 11 (3): 225–244. doi:10.1111/1532-7795.00011.
  74. ^ Hodges Ed., Perry D. (1999). "Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 76 (4): 677–685. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.677. PMID 10234851.
  75. ^ Jose P. E., Kljakovic M., Scheib E., Notter O. (2012). "The Joint Development of Traditional Bullying and Victimization With Cyber Bullying and Victimization in Adolescence". Journal of Research on Adolescence. 22 (2): 301–309. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00764.x.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  76. ^ Brown, B., & Mounts, N. (1989, April). Peer groups structures in single versus multiethnic high schools. Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Diego.
  77. ^ Larkin, R.W. (1979). Suburban youth in cultural crisis. New York: Oxford.
  78. ^ a b Subrahmanyam, Kaveri; Greenfield, Patricia (Spring 2008). "Online Communication and Adolescent Relationships". The Future of Children. 18 (18): 119–146. doi:10.1353/foc.0.0006. PMID 21338008. S2CID 10958863.
  79. ^ a b Carver K., Joyner K., Udry J.R. (2003). National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In Adolescent Romantic Relationships and Sexual Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practical Implications, 291–329.
  80. ^ "Teen Sex Survey". Channel 4. 2008. Archived from the original on 12 September 2008. Retrieved 2008-09-11.
  81. ^ "Seventeen Is the Average Age at First Sexual Intercourse, American Sexual Behavior, p.4-5" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-09-15.
  82. ^ Allen, J., & Land, D. (1999). Attachment in adolescence. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment theory and research. New York: Guilford Press.
  83. ^ Madsen S., Collins W. A. (2005). Differential predictions of young adult romantic relationships from transitory vs. longer romantic experiences during adolescence. Presented at Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Atlanta, GA.
  84. ^ Seiffge-Krenke I., Lang J. (2002). Forming and maintaining romantic relations from early adolescence to young adulthood: evidence of a developmental sequence. Presented at Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 19th, New Orleans, LA.
  85. ^ Pearce M. J., Boergers J., Prinstein M.J. (2002). "Adolescent obesity, overt and relational peer victimization, and romantic relationships". Obesity Research. 10 (5): 386–93. doi:10.1038/oby.2002.53. PMID 12006638.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  86. ^ Zimmer-Gembeck M.J., Siebenbruner J., Collins W.A. (2004). "A prospective study of intraindividual and peer influences on adolescents' heterosexual romantic and sexual behavior". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 33 (4): 381–394. doi:10.1023/B:ASEB.0000028891.16654.2c. PMID 15162084. S2CID 1054833.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  87. ^ Furman, W. & Shafer, L. (2003) The role of romantic relationships in adolescent development.http://www.du.edu/psychology/relationshipcenter/publications/furman_shaffer_2003.pdf
  88. ^ Simon V. A., Aikins J. W., Prinstein M. J. (2008). Romantic partner selection and socialization during early adolescence. Child Dev. In press.
  89. ^ a b O'Sullivan L. F., Cheng M., Brooks-Gunn J., -1#Mantsun K. Harris (2007). "I wanna hold your hand: The progression of social, romantic and sexual events in adolescent relationships". Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 39 (2): 100–107. doi:10.1363/3910007. PMID 17565623.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  90. ^ Manning W., Longmore M., Giordano P. (2000). "The relationship context of contraceptive use at first intercourse". Family Planning Perspectives. 32 (3): 104–110. doi:10.2307/2648158. JSTOR 2648158. PMID 10894255.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  91. ^ Welsh D. P., Haugen P. T., Widman L., Darling N., Grello C. M. (2005). "Kissing is good: a developmental investigation of sexuality in adolescent romantic couples". Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 2 (4): 32–41. doi:10.1525/srsp.2005.2.4.32. S2CID 144037962.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  92. ^ Williams T., Connolly J., Cribbie R. (2008). "Light and heavy heterosexual activities of young Canadian adolescents: normative patterns and differential predictors". Journal of Research on Adolescence. 18: 145–72. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00554.x. hdl:10315/34629.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  93. ^ Grello C. M., Welsh D. P., Harper MS, Dickson J. (2003). "Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning". Adolescent & Family Health. 3: 103–12.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  94. ^ Harden K., Mendle J. (2011). "Adolescent sexual activity and the development of delinquent behavior: The role of relationship context". Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 40 (7): 825–838. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9601-y. PMID 21069562. S2CID 11855204.
  95. ^ Halpern C., Oslak S., Young M., Martin S., Kupper L. (2001). "Partner violence among adolescents in opposite-sex romantic: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health". American Journal of Public Health. 91 (10): 1679–1685. doi:10.2105/AJPH.91.10.1679. PMC 1446854. PMID 11574335.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  96. ^ Halpern C., Young M., Waller M., Martin S., Kupper L. (2004). "Prevalence of partner violence in same-sex romantic and sexual relationships in a national sample of adolescents". Journal of Adolescent Health. 35 (2): 124–131. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.09.003. PMID 15261641.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  97. ^ Collins W. A., Welsh D. P., Furman W. (2009). "Adolescent romantic relationships". Annual Review of Psychology. 60: 631–652. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163459. PMID 19035830.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  98. ^ a b Mulrine, A."Risky Business." U.S. News & World Report. 27 May 2002: 42-49. SIRS Researcher. Web. 25 Oct 2010.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ss13zf/adolescencepagewikiprojectSANDBOX&oldid=1092679370"