User:Sophnette/OLES2129
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_700_Club&action=history
Activity 1 - Talk:Outsourcing
The page of outsourcing has been rated as a C-class, a Level-5 vital article. The Wikipedians who involved in the discussion board mostly found that the concepts of Outsourcing was misleading, and also the arrangements of the article was unclear and confused. To elevate the article's rating to an A-class article, rewriting and reorganisation in terms of its backgrounds, its causes and its global impact needs to be conducted.
Activity 2
Talk:Fairlight (company)#mentioning its impact on Music Industry
Activity 1 28/08/2018
The brief introduction is concise including the precise information that would be break down into the subtitle below. The structure and flow is neat and nicely constructed. The tone of the article is objective, instead of a person reflection.
The information in each section is adequate without waffling.
Activity 1 04/09/2018
added a reference ref.22 by visual editor https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bishop&action=history
added a reference no. 43 by source editor https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sexual_revolution&action=history
11/09/2018
Scholarship
Author’s background
Brian Bailey is graduated from a law school. He is an author and has written more than 20 non-fiction books on subjects as diverse as true crime, history and biography. The source was published in Edinburgh in 2002, which has already been more than 190 years after the murder. Therefore the reliability of the source depends on the degree of well-researched second research. It is the primary source for the whole article.The information of the source is depended on the criminals for the advance of medical knowledge with thoroughly examined evidence.
Activity 09/10/2018
The structure overall is clear and the definition is seem to be well-defined, under stable. The contents is neutral, normative, un-biased, with the adequate provision of knowledge to understand the concepts of Phacolysis, at the same time without any original research which a good wikipedia article should be. The layout can be in listing, point form to make it easier for reader to understand the concepts. For examples, For the signs and symptoms section, it can be split into two parts under this section. The signs and characteristic can be the first part which the structure can be changed into point form or listing, make it more explicit for audience to read it. Explanation of those signs listed in the first part and the relative symptoms can then go under the second sub-section. One the limitation to be improved is the reference of the article. Although the result from the Goggle search is based on the contents the schlars published, 'Google search’ should not be used as a reference, and instead the reference should refer to the writer who wrote the idea, so that the reader can refer to the scholars for further reading and investigations. The sources used are in need of more and deeper consideration about the original source used in the article and its verifiability, such as the author background. The majority of the sources are published in 2018, which is very up-to-dated resource.