User:Sjc/admin reference

FILED:

These are the ones who seem suspicious to me:

I'm not saying they're all sock puppets, but they seem to have the same interests. Rick K 06:43, Oct 20, 2004 (UTC)

since when has having the same interests as a person mattered? I strongly resent being called a sock puppet, I WAS ON HERE BEFORE RADMAN EVEN JOINED! Alkivar 04:07, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I don't know a single person on this list. The only thing that links us is that we appparently all share the view that Wikipedia should a bit more tolerant of quirky, underrepresented subjects. If you're that curious, I've been using the nickname "lifefeed" for over 6 years now, you can google it if you want.- Lifefeed 02:00, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)

This is rich, it looks like we've been rounded up by town sherriff RickK for sharing similar viewpoints. I guess its now criminal to believe that there is hope for Wikipedia's future, rather than standing by as it crumbles at the fingertips of powerhungry admins who only want you to read what they believe to be important and "notable". This in itself is disturbing and could very well lead to the downfall and demise of this great opportunity for learning. Mark my words. GRider 20:35, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

ATTACHED: I thought you should know that you've been reported as "under suspicion" for puppetry because you supported one or more of my articles. [..] I thought you might get a good chuckle out of that. Good ol' RickK. Radman1 04:02, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lifefeed"

hehe interesting stuff, how they all chime in after Radman1 posts (see attached) on their user talk pages. I will be keeping an interested eye out. While they do not seem ostensibly to be sock-puppets, I note RickK's concerns and they seem to dovetail with some of my own about certain members. Sjc 06:13, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)