User:Sjandreau17/sandbox

This is the user sandbox of Sjandreau17. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here.

Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox

Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

User:Kolby Arnold/sandbox User:TaylorBuck15/sandbox

Tsung-Yen, C., & Ming-Shiou, K. (2016). A Motion-Sensing Game-Based Therapy to Foster the Learning of Children with Sensory Integration Dysfunction. Journal Of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 4-16.

Leong, H., Carter, M., & Stephenson, J. (2015). Meta-analysis of Research on Sensory Integration Therapy for Individuals with Developmental and Learning Disabilities. Journal Of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 27(2), 183-206. doi:10.1007/s10882-014-9408-y

Jaegermann, N., & Klein, P. S. (2010). Enhancing mothers' interactions with toddlers who have sensory-processing disorders. Infant Mental Health Journal, 31(3), 291-311. doi:10.1002/imhj.20257

Baranek, G. T. (2002). Efficacy of Sensory and Motor Interventions for Children with Autism. Journal Of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 397.

Ghanizadeh, A. (2009). Tactile sensory dysfunction in children with ADHD. Behavioural Neurology, 20(3/4), 107-112. doi:10.3233/BEN-2008-0221 I read the article on sensory processing disorder, overall the article was good and succinct I think it had a lot of good information in it and pretty much followed what I knew on the topic already. There were some biasing statements, especially in the first paragraph. At the end of the intro paragraph, the author stated that the condition is ignored by healthcare providers. There was no reference and it kind of biased by my opinion of all the information I was reading. The only thing I would really take out is probably the history section just because I find it unnecessary and did not expand my understanding of the condition.

References: 84 the link does not work for the article. 42 the article cannot be found using the link. Overall the articles looked well researched, there were a few (25, 85, 3,) that are more than 20 years old and probably shouldn't be used anymore. I am sure there are more modern replacements for those articles. Sjandreau17 (talk) 13:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)