User:Seacucumber7/Greenland shark/Schumannmalloryi Peer Review
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing?
Seacucumber7
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:Seacucumber7/Greenland shark
Evaluate the drafted changes
[edit]When first reading your changes it seems like you added a lot to the description and longevity sections! However, upon reading the entire article it feels like maybe you could add or adjust a couple of the other sections, even if it's simple changes or additions. I love that you were able to add another photo to the article, it provides a better more clear angle than the photo listed on the right side of the article. It looks like you have a lot of references and many external links so that all looks good. Couple small things I would recommend considering. Check the ends of your sections, it feels like some of your closing statements kind of trail off instead of wrapping everything up. Secondly, maybe move around the sections you have. You end the longevity section talking about conservation but then the next available section is reproduction, which honestly feels like it could be part of a larger behavior section if possible. Beyond that awesome work! Your draft is a very strong start and definitely adds to the overall depth of the original article.